You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #56: We'll need to memorize those two sentences! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
56. We'll need to memorize those two sentences!
What's already showing up in the new smears being leveled at the Wilsons today is that some obviously don't have a clear understanding of the term "classified". Even people on here are spewing it!

Read that Indictment, people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Plame's CIA status: she was covert EarlG  Oct-28-05 12:13 PM   #0 
  - So there you have it eh. nm  texpatriot2004   Oct-28-05 12:14 PM   #1 
  - Then why no conviction on the Espionage Act?  VolcanoJen   Oct-28-05 12:14 PM   #2 
  - Is he angling for a bigger fish to indict under the the Espionage Act? n/t  Tatiana   Oct-28-05 12:15 PM   #5 
  - fitz is not done yet.  yodermon   Oct-28-05 12:16 PM   #7 
  - Agreed - there's still exposure of CIA agent AND unauthorized disclosure  BR_Parkway   Oct-28-05 12:23 PM   #24 
  - but they haven't found who actually leaked  savemefromdumbya   Oct-28-05 12:17 PM   #9 
  - That would not matter...  rateyes   Oct-28-05 12:28 PM   #27 
  - they obviously knew she was CIA  centristo   Oct-28-05 12:39 PM   #30 
  - I suspect that they are parsing, for now  MADem   Oct-28-05 04:14 PM   #50 
  - Thank you  stop the bleeding   Oct-28-05 12:14 PM   #3 
  - it would be useful to call in to the TV networks such as Fox, CNN if they  savemefromdumbya   Oct-28-05 12:19 PM   #14 
  - k&r  FLDem5   Oct-28-05 12:15 PM   #4 
  - Exactly. To hear them talk you would have thought  crispini   Oct-28-05 12:16 PM   #8 
  - what does k&r mean?  Kadie   Oct-28-05 12:20 PM   #16 
     - kicked and recommended - I can't type anymore!  FLDem5   Oct-28-05 12:21 PM   #19 
        - ahh, Thanks! n/t  Kadie   Oct-28-05 12:23 PM   #20 
  - Yep.  H2O Man   Oct-28-05 12:16 PM   #6 
  - K & R  LincolnMcGrath   Oct-28-05 12:18 PM   #10 
  - Also I think ABC News said that no info on covert staus can be  Crazy Guggenheim   Oct-28-05 12:18 PM   #11 
  - Well that excuse is out the door  indigo32   Oct-28-05 12:18 PM   #12 
  - And I plan on using that to knock a few right-wingers on the head  Lone_Star_Dem   Oct-28-05 12:19 PM   #13 
  - Randi Rhodes was adamant about that  pirhana   Oct-28-05 12:19 PM   #15 
  - Lindsey Graham said last night on Larry King that charges of violation  spunky   Oct-28-05 12:21 PM   #17 
  - And we all know that Little Lindsey never talks out of his ass.  ClassWarrior   Oct-28-05 12:24 PM   #25 
  - Ouch.  Gregorian   Oct-28-05 12:21 PM   #18 
  - Joe Wilson "Politics of Truth"  nomatrix   Oct-28-05 12:23 PM   #21 
  - Freeper response: There's a difference between being classified and covert  Seen the light   Oct-28-05 12:23 PM   #22 
  - She was both... her status was classified because she was covert.  Cults4Bush   Oct-28-05 12:31 PM   #28 
  - Oh for crying out loud. No, she was covert just for the hell of it.  belle   Oct-28-05 04:01 PM   #44 
  - Ohh Victoria! Ohh Joe! You smucks. How many times have you  higher class   Oct-28-05 12:23 PM   #23 
  - Write them! I have. I will again now as well. Though they never respond.  Cults4Bush   Oct-28-05 12:33 PM   #29 
  - well joe would know..since victoria wrote the law of outing  flyarm   Oct-28-05 04:03 PM   #45 
  - Does this mean that she worked overseas in that capacity?  Jara sang   Oct-28-05 12:25 PM   #26 
  - Ummm... not to be a party-pooper, but  wrathofkahn   Oct-28-05 01:03 PM   #31 
  - But Plame was. n/t  H2O Man   Oct-28-05 01:06 PM   #32 
  - The point was...  wrathofkahn   Oct-28-05 01:10 PM   #35 
     - I don't think  H2O Man   Oct-28-05 01:13 PM   #38 
     - Apparently, Covert is a person, and Classified is information:  FLDem5   Oct-28-05 01:18 PM   #40 
     - Well, I'm sure Scooter's lawyer will be thrilled to have your input.  belle   Oct-28-05 04:04 PM   #46 
     - bullshit..you must not have listened to what fitz said!! that outing  flyarm   Oct-28-05 04:10 PM   #49 
  - The key finding is that her status was NOT known outside the CIA.  Zynx   Oct-28-05 01:09 PM   #34 
  - thats okay, the semantics miss the meat of the matter:  FLDem5   Oct-28-05 01:11 PM   #36 
  - one of the reporters asked fitz if valerie was covert and he said he  flyarm   Oct-28-05 04:08 PM   #48 
  - Case closed. Right-wingers have been lying on national TV. It's official.  Zynx   Oct-28-05 01:09 PM   #33 
  - Claiming they didn't know is negligence. They're too smart not to check.  Metta   Oct-28-05 01:12 PM   #37 
  - A Grand Jury has decided so!  Roland99   Oct-28-05 01:13 PM   #39 
  - Odd, I just heard it repeated again by Hatch on CNN.  MelissaB   Oct-28-05 03:03 PM   #41 
  - Fitzgerald said differently in the press conference  DoubleDigitIQ   Oct-28-05 03:52 PM   #42 
  - He just seems very closed-mouthed in general, which is fine.  belle   Oct-28-05 04:07 PM   #47 
  - Well Put  KFC   Oct-28-05 04:46 PM   #54 
  - All he is saying, FOR NOW, is that Classified Material WAS Divulged  MADem   Oct-28-05 04:21 PM   #51 
  - Yes, Prezznit Butch called this matter "serious.' I call it HUGH!  Bush_Eats_Beef   Oct-28-05 03:54 PM   #43 
  - Libby, Cheney knew Wilson worked in Operations...spooksville.  Garbo 2004   Oct-28-05 04:33 PM   #52 
  - Thanks for clarifying that for me. I did not know what her status was...  PatriotGames   Oct-28-05 04:40 PM   #53 
  - And don't forget that Fitzgerald said "Valerie Wilson's cover was blown"  OmmmSweetOmmm   Oct-28-05 04:54 PM   #55 
  - We'll need to memorize those two sentences!  countryjake   Oct-28-05 05:43 PM   #56 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC