You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: you're naming charges, not crimes [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. you're naming charges, not crimes
Espionage, IIPA, an conspiracy could all go to the crime of outting Plame.

Conspiracy, perjury, and Obstruction would all go to the crime of the coverup.

Two indictments, three charges in each indictment with multiple defendents in each.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -One federal indictment; five counts; three defendents Walt Starr  Oct-25-05 04:18 PM   #0 
  - Thanks Walt for this info/perspective. n.t  texpatriot2004   Oct-25-05 04:21 PM   #1 
  - "A single indictment could ahve a dozen charges & a half dozen defendents"  Lex   Oct-25-05 04:21 PM   #2 
  - This is why I think having five indictments would be a cataclysmic  Walt Starr   Oct-25-05 04:25 PM   #4 
     - Here's five off the top of my head.  robertpaulsen   Oct-25-05 04:27 PM   #5 
        - you're naming charges, not crimes  Walt Starr   Oct-25-05 04:30 PM   #7 
        - OK Walt, now my jaw is on the floor.  robertpaulsen   Oct-25-05 04:51 PM   #8 
           - You're getting it.  Walt Starr   Oct-25-05 07:12 PM   #13 
        - Would conspiracy fall under RICO?  LiberalEsto   Oct-25-05 04:55 PM   #9 
           - RICO Could be there for ay of the crimes, potentially n/t  Walt Starr   Oct-25-05 07:16 PM   #14 
  - Thanks for the info--I was just reviewing this list  Emit   Oct-25-05 04:23 PM   #3 
  - No mention of Bolton or Condoleeza Rice  Catrina   Oct-25-05 04:58 PM   #10 
  - Thanks, this is good to know!  Pepper32   Oct-25-05 04:30 PM   #6 
  - Fitz' is sealing them, any chance it's to protect the AIPAC/Franklin  HereSince1628   Oct-25-05 05:01 PM   #11 
  - I think it could be separate transactions that get separate indictments.  Redbear   Oct-25-05 05:11 PM   #12 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC