You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: Later this week...Later this week [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Later this week...Later this week
ARRRGH!!! I can't take it anymore!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  - Fitzgerald has decided to seek indictments,---Story is up hang a left  Oct-25-05 12:02 PM   #0 
  - Only two - darn it - I guessed three.  FLDem5   Oct-25-05 12:03 PM   #1 
  - "will not seek indictments that assert officials leaked Plame's name ille"  jsamuel   Oct-25-05 12:03 PM   #2 
  - if true it is a crock, and means that nothing will happen  still_one   Oct-25-05 12:05 PM   #15 
  - They're not saying only two  demobabe   Oct-25-05 12:16 PM   #34 
     - I am just lowering my expectations, and hope it is much better  still_one   Oct-25-05 12:20 PM   #39 
  - How reliable is rawstory anyway?  Roon   Oct-25-05 12:07 PM   #18 
     - rawstory is reliable, but doesn't mean their source isn't giving a little  jsamuel   Oct-25-05 12:10 PM   #20 
  - Later this week...Later this week  Roon   Oct-25-05 12:04 PM   #3 
  - Raw Story's "developing" story on indictments now online:  highplainsdem   Oct-25-05 12:04 PM   #4 
  - Two?  Just Me   Oct-25-05 12:04 PM   #5 
  - Well, it says at least two  Lone_Star_Dem   Oct-25-05 12:04 PM   #12 
  - "at least 2"  Teaser   Oct-25-05 12:04 PM   #6 
  - 2 indictments does not mean 2 people  Jersey Devil   Oct-25-05 12:07 PM   #19 
     - Hmmmm! You're getting hopes up again.  Verve   Oct-25-05 12:12 PM   #27 
     - conspiracy to obstruct justice, to commit perjury  Jersey Devil   Oct-25-05 12:14 PM   #30 
        - You should post this seperately Jersy Devil.  Verve   Oct-25-05 12:19 PM   #38 
           - I agree, I think people (incl me) will be disheartened if there is  jasmeel   Oct-25-05 12:22 PM   #43 
     - Didn't know that--thanks!  jasmeel   Oct-25-05 12:20 PM   #41 
     - Um,...no,...one indictment for each crime.  Just Me   Oct-25-05 12:30 PM   #50 
  - oh gawd, I really hope it's more than that after all this  mattomjoe   Oct-25-05 12:04 PM   #7 
  - Let down,  stop the bleeding   Oct-25-05 12:04 PM   #8 
  - "at least two"...Mmmmmmmmmm.  Quakerfriend   Oct-25-05 12:04 PM   #9 
  - Geez, all the hype and it's a rerun.  HereSince1628   Oct-25-05 12:04 PM   #10 
  - I know. I've read that same thing before.  Walt Starr   Oct-25-05 12:56 PM   #59 
  - Remember, it's not the sex, it's the lying  Midnight Rambler   Oct-25-05 12:04 PM   #11 
  - LOL! Yeh, Right!  Verve   Oct-25-05 12:06 PM   #16 
  - But if they only charge them with perjury  Marie26   Oct-25-05 12:11 PM   #24 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-25-05 12:11 PM   #25 
  - this is all the same from "laywers familiar with the investigation"  annabanana   Oct-25-05 12:07 PM   #17 
  - Hmm. Makes me think Kay Baily knew something ?? Like she  Laura PackYourBags   Oct-25-05 12:05 PM   #13 
  - Exactly! The repubs know the MSM won't throw their words from  jasmeel   Oct-25-05 12:24 PM   #47 
  - THIS STORY SUCKS!!!!!!11111!!!  hang a left   Oct-25-05 12:05 PM   #14 
  - Patience, At least two...could be more.  DearAbby   Oct-25-05 12:11 PM   #23 
  - this is why I have low expectations  still_one   Oct-25-05 12:10 PM   #21 
  - First of all - no one actually knows ANYTHING yet  meganmonkey   Oct-25-05 12:11 PM   #22 
  - Perjury probably won't get  mmonk   Oct-25-05 12:13 PM   #28 
  - IMPEACH BUSH  Veronicrat   Oct-25-05 12:13 PM   #29 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-25-05 12:16 PM   #32 
  - Clinton "misleading the Court" was not perjury 'cuz it was not material  papau   Oct-25-05 12:20 PM   #40 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-25-05 12:32 PM   #51 
     - I disagree - "memory" problems put many in jail. Human nature is  papau   Oct-25-05 12:38 PM   #54 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-25-05 12:42 PM   #57 
           - Giving Permission to go to war over National Security" is not the same as  papau   Oct-25-05 12:54 PM   #58 
  - That's the whole point! FITZ ISN'T TELLING ANYONE ANYTHING YET!  meganmonkey   Oct-25-05 12:22 PM   #42 
  - Thank you.  deadparrot   Oct-25-05 12:18 PM   #36 
  - thank you meganmoney....  flyarm   Oct-25-05 03:49 PM   #60 
  - Typical crap from Rawstory  DemNoir   Oct-25-05 12:11 PM   #26 
  - Ding! Ding! Ding! We Have a Winner!  sleipnir   Oct-25-05 12:16 PM   #33 
  - Let's don't freak out.. this is a glorifed rumor..  KyndCulture   Oct-25-05 12:14 PM   #31 
  - Until Fitzgerald announces it  Bluzmann57   Oct-25-05 12:17 PM   #35 
  - thank you..a reasonable mind!!  flyarm   Oct-25-05 03:51 PM   #61 
     - Well...very few people think I am a reasonable mind  Bluzmann57   Oct-25-05 03:54 PM   #62 
  - this story is hardly newsworthy  Halliburton   Oct-25-05 12:18 PM   #37 
  - I don't know, but it's getting to be almost funny watching everyone react  meganmonkey   Oct-25-05 12:22 PM   #44 
  - To Get Clicks  Crisco   Oct-25-05 12:29 PM   #49 
  - The story seems incomplete, at best  Tummler   Oct-25-05 12:24 PM   #45 
  - See Jersey Devil's Post #19. 2 indictments DOES NOT = 2 people!  Verve   Oct-25-05 12:27 PM   #48 
     - Thanks -- but I still have concerns about this article's accuracy  Tummler   Oct-25-05 12:39 PM   #55 
  - I think I'll just wait for Fitzgerald to say something.  Connie_Corleone   Oct-25-05 12:24 PM   #46 
  - yeah I agree  Halliburton   Oct-25-05 12:32 PM   #52 
  - Me, too, Connie.  Maddy McCall   Oct-25-05 12:40 PM   #56 
  - Bullshit.  Maddy McCall   Oct-25-05 12:32 PM   #53 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC