Reply #10: Thanks for the video

[ProfessorPlum]

One thing, though.

Clinton didn't commit perjury. Perjury is lying under oath about something that is material to the case being adjudicated. Lying under oath is something else - also potentially a crime, certainly not really a good moral or ethical thing to do, but Clinton was not ever guilty of perjury.

It's also not clear that he "lied under oath", given the definitions of "sexual relations" that the layers were operating under. Clinton was rebuked by the bar association for his actions, but he never perjured himself, and it is debatable whether he really lied under oath. He was certainly misleading.

But it is sad to see that even progressives give up these important distinctions to the history that the regressives keep trying to write, despite the actual facts.