In my opinion a person's rights are infringed only when such an infringement actually occurs, not when the potential is there. Restricting or limiting a person's rights should be an absolute worst-case scenario. I'd rather deal with culprits who decide to infringe the rights of others than desperately try to keep each and every person 100% safe with preventative measures.
Of course, I also don't believe in helmet laws and I'm for complete drug legalization. So I guess I do have a nasty libertarian streak. :evilgrin:
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
