Reply #6: Also, about what XM values....

[drbtg1]

This statement struck me as odd.

XM saw the value of grabbing the exclusivity WHILE THEY COULD and they would both get stronger because of it

Now, in this day and age, if XM truly valued AAR exclusivity, shouldn't they feature that HERE:

http://www.xmradio.com/learn/programming.jsp

I mean, if you're going to tout exclusivity with MSNBC and Starbucks music along with about a dozen other exclusives, wouldn't a word about AAR exclusivity, after all this time, be appropriate?

Or, perhaps you'd at least want say something HERE:

http://www.xmradio.com/programming/channel_page.jsp?ch=167

Instead, we get a demeaning comment about "Get your daily marching orders".

Sorry, but if a company can't, or won't, feature this alledged selling point on one of their most prominent and detailed advertisement vehicles, then that doesn't show they value the property in question. Why isn't Danny Goldberg up in arms about this?