You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: What exactly set you off? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
20. What exactly set you off?
I've assumed that we've been screwed six ways from Sunday since 12/13/2000. Why would some changes in military legal language be critical? Various Emergency Acts written as Public Laws and USA-PATRIOT give them all the power they need.

All they're doing is making their book of excuses look better for when they need a justification for some tyrannical act or another. This particular one applies to military personnel. "Martial Law" doesn't mean that the populace would have to follow the UCMJ and face courts-martial for civil infractions. The term "Martial Law" is commonly used as a synonym for "Emergency Law" especially if the Military is being used to help keep order.

As for the military personnel themselves, the same Abu Ghraib scandal you mention is instructive, which is why we pay attention to it. Three people took the heat for an entire chan of command, two enlisted women and one non-commissioned officer. Oh, okay, Gen. Janice Karpinsky took some heat, but only because she ruffled some of her Supreme Commander In Chief's feathers. And a lieutenant had to forfeit some pay. But all of this was decided before the Courts-Martial decided on the chapter and verse the punishment would be administered under.

You didn't even link to MCM-2000 (Rev. 2002). You could have at least posted the document as changed by the EO. You did incorporate the changes as stipulated by our Beloved Maximum Leader, didn't you?

I look at everything Bush does as a potential cancer on the body politic of the USA, and I do not take these changes lightly. But none of them are, by themselves, linchpins of the regime. To a dictator, law really is bass-ackwards: they do what they will, then their lawyers cobble together justifications. Instruments like USA-PATRIOT and Executive Orders are not strictly necessary, but they make things easier for the lawyers.

But here's the part of the picture I do not get: why every day, half a dozen people scream that everybody is stupid and sheep-like (except themselves). They seem to forget that education works better than punishment. It's easy to get frustrated in times like these. And that's exactly why we all need to redouble our educational efforts.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC