You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: Again, I DON'T think so. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. Again, I DON'T think so.
But we need more than that to convince the sheeple that voted for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -If the Dems don't unite against Miers, they will rue the day. cantstandbush  Oct-04-05 03:32 PM   #0 
  - Based upon what?  Vash the Stampede   Oct-04-05 03:34 PM   #1 
  - Bush likes her. Picked for that, and stealth.  Inland   Oct-04-05 03:56 PM   #4 
  - Good enough for you, but probably not the 62 million that voted for Bush.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-04-05 03:58 PM   #8 
  - Then she'll be confirmed. But you asked for a reason.  Inland   Oct-04-05 04:02 PM   #12 
  - That's not going to fly  LittleClarkie   Oct-04-05 04:00 PM   #10 
     - Her comments  ewagner   Oct-04-05 04:08 PM   #13 
     - What are your political reasons?  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 07:49 AM   #19 
        - Sorry for the late reply  ewagner   Oct-05-05 03:44 PM   #47 
     - It flies pretty darn good with me.  Inland   Oct-04-05 04:12 PM   #15 
        - If you're on DU, we don't need to convince YOU.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 07:58 AM   #25 
           - Your faulty assumptions make winning over Bush voters impossible.  Inland   Oct-05-05 10:55 AM   #43 
              - We don't need dirt. We need something substantive.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 11:54 AM   #44 
                 - Well, you've given up, really.  Inland   Oct-05-05 12:07 PM   #45 
                    - Maybe you give the average person too much credit.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 12:18 PM   #46 
  - What about the accusations of money laundering?  Dora   Oct-04-05 03:57 PM   #6 
  - If that amounts to anything, sure that'd be enough.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-04-05 03:59 PM   #9 
  - I've got four things:  Paligal   Oct-04-05 04:21 PM   #17 
  - Three of those four are hearsay.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 07:57 AM   #24 
  - She has no experience and we will not be allowed to review her papers.  leesa   Oct-05-05 07:54 AM   #21 
  - Listen, it's not ME you have to sell it to.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 07:56 AM   #23 
     - Then don't start a flame war.  zanne   Oct-05-05 08:08 AM   #29 
        - Incendiary? Not at all.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 08:10 AM   #32 
  - When did you start trusting George W. Bush?  zanne   Oct-05-05 08:05 AM   #28 
  - 62 million people trusted Bush in 2004. I was not one of them.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 08:11 AM   #33 
  - I would say that she will definitely overturn RvW. If Dems can't protect  tasteblind   Oct-05-05 08:10 AM   #31 
     - That majority didn't show up in November.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 08:12 AM   #34 
        - Depends on who you ask.  tasteblind   Oct-05-05 08:19 AM   #37 
  - Yeah, you;re right! The only problem is  freethought   Oct-04-05 03:38 PM   #2 
  - The only problem is no one can answer my question above.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-04-05 03:46 PM   #3 
     - What are her qualifications?  djohnson   Oct-04-05 03:56 PM   #5 
        - Not good enough. Plenty of others have been confirmed on less.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-04-05 03:58 PM   #7 
           - Because it's been done before doesn't make it right.  djohnson   Oct-04-05 04:02 PM   #11 
           - Again, I DON'T think so.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 08:00 AM   #27 
           - And that's not a reason to you?? You are just arguing to argue.  leesa   Oct-05-05 07:55 AM   #22 
              - No, I'm just not the one who needs convincing.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 07:59 AM   #26 
              - And looking for attention.  zanne   Oct-05-05 08:09 AM   #30 
                 - It's called "thinking".  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 08:12 AM   #35 
                    - I repeat--  zanne   Oct-05-05 08:56 AM   #39 
                       - No, I think I'll just put you on ignore.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 08:57 AM   #40 
  - I agree. Bye, bye, female rights. Guess they don't matter anymore...n/t  converted_democrat   Oct-04-05 04:09 PM   #14 
  - and bye bye 2006  depakid   Oct-04-05 04:24 PM   #18 
  - no they won't  leftchick   Oct-04-05 04:20 PM   #16 
  - They won't. A Fundie Christian lunatic without experience is OK with them  leesa   Oct-05-05 07:52 AM   #20 
  - right, cause it is even a little reasonable to believe dems  seabeyond   Oct-05-05 08:12 AM   #36 
     - That line of thinking seems lost on some.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 08:29 AM   #38 
        - totally into war pigs right now..........  seabeyond   Oct-05-05 09:05 AM   #41 
           - Well said. I'm sick of it too.  Vash the Stampede   Oct-05-05 09:09 AM   #42 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC