You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #50: When you have truth on your side, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. When you have truth on your side,
why introduce partisan politics into matters? Let the facts speak for themselves.

If certain Democratic politicians had behaved in a criminal or harmfully stupid manner, it would not be partisan politics if the Republicans took them to task about it, since they would be doing no more than affording the American people the opportunity to the learn the truths concerned, truths detrimentally affecting both the government and the life of the nation.

Only in possession of such knowledge can the American people be expected to take appropriate action through the channels available to them.

That is all that Democratic spokespersons need to say, ideally, more succinctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -My treason-gate/Plame predictions..... tableturner  Oct-01-05 09:28 AM   #0 
  - I have followed Plame very closely for a long time  Phoebe Loosinhouse   Oct-01-05 09:32 AM   #1 
  - I agree... Bolton should be up there too.  Blue Belle   Oct-01-05 08:10 PM   #55 
  - Nice synopsis - i like it - sending it off into the ethers with my  JoMama49   Oct-01-05 09:32 AM   #2 
  - Bush and Cheney will never resign  jim3775   Oct-01-05 09:38 AM   #3 
  - not just partisan activist judges - an out of control prosecutor  NewJeffCT   Oct-01-05 10:09 AM   #12 
  - Don't you find that when people protest so much...  HughMoran   Oct-01-05 10:13 AM   #15 
     - they control most of the media  NewJeffCT   Oct-01-05 10:21 AM   #20 
     - But how much more so,  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Oct-01-05 06:08 PM   #49 
     - Delays indicter was the Grand Jury not a Prosecutor  Toots   Oct-01-05 10:33 AM   #23 
        - however, as they say  NewJeffCT   Oct-01-05 10:39 AM   #27 
           - I call BALONEY on your ham sandwich line--  elehhhhna   Oct-01-05 11:12 AM   #35 
           - my point was...  NewJeffCT   Oct-01-05 01:15 PM   #40 
              - How about Reagan's famous line  Catrina   Oct-01-05 01:44 PM   #41 
              - Enjoyed your post  liberalla   Oct-01-05 11:46 PM   #58 
              - You say "Mister Tweety, I have eaten a ham sandwich and I can tell you  elehhhhna   Oct-01-05 03:11 PM   #46 
              - When you have truth on your side,  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Oct-01-05 06:25 PM   #50 
           - Well, Ken Mehlman uses the ham sandwich line  FrankBooth   Oct-01-05 03:22 PM   #47 
  - what's the point about this antiquated "pardoning" anyway....  marions ghost   Oct-01-05 10:42 AM   #30 
     - It would be regarded as some kind of joke,  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Oct-01-05 06:52 PM   #52 
        - Is there any limit on how many can be pardoned?  marions ghost   Oct-01-05 10:18 PM   #56 
  - GOP Pigs lose Congress  Sarah Ibarruri   Oct-01-05 09:53 AM   #4 
  - Maybe I am mis-reading your post  Glenda   Oct-01-05 09:57 AM   #7 
  - That's interesting...  Glenda   Oct-01-05 09:53 AM   #5 
  - Wasn't Clinton indicted as  Nite Owl   Oct-01-05 09:54 AM   #6 
  - No, Clinton was impeached by Congress  rox63   Oct-01-05 09:59 AM   #8 
  - I think Owl was referring to a civil suit.  hootinholler   Oct-01-05 10:16 AM   #18 
     - Yes that suit.  Nite Owl   Oct-01-05 10:41 AM   #29 
     - Yep,  hootinholler   Oct-01-05 12:47 PM   #38 
     - Wasn't there some loophole there about the alleged event taking place  Lone_Star_Dem   Oct-01-05 01:55 PM   #43 
  - No he was sued by that person but never indicted of any crime.  Toots   Oct-01-05 10:35 AM   #24 
  - Oh my, I can only hope that you're correct on all predictions!  Turn CO Blue   Oct-01-05 10:00 AM   #9 
  - "Triple Chocolate MELTDOWN "  HughMoran   Oct-01-05 10:09 AM   #13 
     - LOL, I love the handle! HughMoran, are you series???? n/t  Turn CO Blue   Oct-01-05 10:18 AM   #19 
        - "Series" is my middle name  HughMoran   Oct-01-05 10:29 AM   #21 
           - I'd say "welcome to DU" but I suspect you've been here awhile  Turn CO Blue   Oct-01-05 10:35 AM   #25 
              - Oh, you're a sharp one, Turn CO Blue!  HughMoran   Oct-01-05 10:40 AM   #28 
  - Most of the people on this trip will be indicted  DoYouEverWonder   Oct-01-05 10:02 AM   #10 
  - That's interesting...  Glenda   Oct-01-05 10:07 AM   #11 
  - Watergate dates.  longship   Oct-01-05 02:09 PM   #44 
  - From your fingers to the Universe's eyes! eom  OmmmSweetOmmm   Oct-01-05 10:11 AM   #14 
  - (cannot indict a sitting president or VP)  hootinholler   Oct-01-05 10:13 AM   #16 
  - ah yes.. nolo contendre  annabanana   Oct-01-05 07:23 PM   #53 
  - It's all Clinton's fault!!!!!!!  sellitman   Oct-01-05 10:15 AM   #17 
  - I love your optimism, however, I am afraid it's a bit  EST   Oct-01-05 10:32 AM   #22 
  - I would add the charge Conspiracy to Commit Treason  berni_mccoy   Oct-01-05 10:35 AM   #26 
  - Here are my predictions . . .  unrepuke   Oct-01-05 10:42 AM   #31 
  - lol  ananda   Oct-01-05 11:18 AM   #36 
  - Great thread, good calls..  symbolman   Oct-01-05 10:55 AM   #32 
  - Wishful thinking.  nvliberal   Oct-01-05 10:58 AM   #33 
  - Uhhmmmm...  troubleinwinter   Oct-01-05 01:15 PM   #39 
  - That seems like a best case scenario for the country.  bearfan454   Oct-01-05 11:03 AM   #34 
  - Dream on  indepat   Oct-01-05 11:20 AM   #37 
  - Good, but some corrections.  longship   Oct-01-05 01:53 PM   #42 
  - The "pigs lose Congress" part will only happen if we can get rid of  Peace Patriot   Oct-01-05 02:37 PM   #45 
  - That is beautiful  tavalon   Oct-01-05 03:24 PM   #48 
  - We can only hope.  Independent_Liberal   Oct-01-05 06:52 PM   #51 
  - Ok, Here's A VERY BOLD PREDICTION  Beetwasher   Oct-01-05 07:34 PM   #54 
  - As the original poster of this thread, here are some more thoughts....  tableturner   Oct-01-05 11:23 PM   #57 
  - I think you were right on about Gonzales  hang a left   Oct-02-05 12:07 AM   #59 
     - He gave up SCOTUS for *  serryjw   Oct-02-05 12:36 AM   #60 
     - Actually, you were right about Gonzalez...  tableturner   Oct-02-05 08:44 AM   #61 
  - Source to Stephanopoulos: President Bush Directly Involved In Leak Scandal  tableturner   Oct-02-05 10:19 AM   #62 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC