You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: Christan Churches should oppose [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Christan Churches should oppose
this faulty foray into combining science and religion. After all, it uses old deist and french philosophe wedges once intended to DIMINISH the influence of religion in science, the absent clockmaker God, the making of God in the image of the human mind as conceived by rationalists, a very non-emotive, restrictive and dampening intellectualization of faith.

If the WCC had any guts it would declare this BS anathema or whatever. Although in the pre-Renaissance days the world knowledge was left with a "theory" the world could be round, to insist on a retrograde retreat into darkness is the mark of a heresy- and a weird one at that. At least the Gnostics and Marcionites were not flying in the face of common knowledge. Their fantasies were reserved for the unseen.

Just because the mainstream Church power has lost all secular pull and its excommunications and anathemas don't lead to real life stakes and imprisonment doesn't mean that genuine Christians don't have a duty to speak out at really really abusive doctrines inflicted on society as political persecution. Is it reticence, embarrassment? A mutual club thing? A heretic is simply a self proclaimed Christian who is not one, but one glomming onto the name with idolatry of self and offensive alternatives. In less institutionalized and educated times, early in the Church's history there were cults galore, a soapbox for every new idiot prophet. Then there was the one Church world that never got its ideals wrapped around the World. Now there is the compartmentalized bland coexistence that refuses to deal with evil at all when it hits too close to its whitened walls.

Some Christians should enjoin the suit on religious grounds that ID is not a viable Christian theory at all. Our theologians would make mincemeat out of theirs. Fundamentally wrong, scientifically invalid, religiously in error. That leaves it as a frivolous argument for nutjobs to bully our schoolchildren and lie to them about both religion and science in such a way as to warp them into insane, impractical world views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC