Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Under what cirumstance is abortion moral? I've always thought about this [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
yellowjacket7 (84 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep-29-05 10:58 PM
Original message
Under what cirumstance is abortion moral? I've always thought about this
Advertisements [?]
I still can't come up with something plausible. Seems to me abortions are undertaken not from a moral point of view but maybe more from a financial point of view. With the exception of incest or rape, what moral standpoints are there for abortion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  Under what cirumstance is abortion moral? I've always thought about this yellowjacket7  Sep-29-05 10:58 PM   #0 
   Under any circumstance.  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:00 PM   #1 
   Well said!  LynnTheDem   Sep-29-05 11:03 PM   #10 
   Thanks!  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:11 PM   #27 
   Exactly  FreedomAngel82   Sep-29-05 11:55 PM   #129 
      Stupid MFers seem to think there were no abortions until it was legal  LynnTheDem   Sep-30-05 12:09 AM   #162 
         They know that...  benburch   Sep-30-05 12:34 AM   #190 
   Amen  RPM   Sep-29-05 11:19 PM   #46 
   So you say a fetus is not a person  yellowjacket7   Sep-29-05 11:24 PM   #58 
   When it draws breath.  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:26 PM   #62 
   That's between the WOMAN and her DOCTOR.  LynnTheDem   Sep-29-05 11:27 PM   #64 
   Exactly!  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:30 PM   #68 
   So what is the moral argument here?  yellowjacket7   Sep-29-05 11:30 PM   #69 
   Why should we have to?  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:32 PM   #77 
   At 8 or 8 months, it is still a fetus?  yellowjacket7   Sep-29-05 11:35 PM   #80 
      It ought to be lawful up to time of live birth.  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:37 PM   #88 
      pregnancy termination at 9 mons is called "delivery"  wellstone_democrat   Sep-29-05 11:42 PM   #103 
      or eight minutes?  salin   Sep-29-05 11:44 PM   #105 
      LOL! Pregnancy IS terminated at nine months!  CoolOnion   Sep-29-05 11:45 PM   #107 
      Most pregnancies are naturally terminated  yellowjacket7   Sep-29-05 11:49 PM   #116 
         Well what about a ceasarian section then?  Crunchy Frog   Sep-29-05 11:57 PM   #140 
            And what about in-vitro fertilization?  CoolOnion   Sep-30-05 12:02 AM   #151 
            Yes, that's physically induced  yellowjacket7   Sep-30-05 12:04 AM   #156 
               As A Matter Of Curiousity, Sir  The Magistrate   Sep-30-05 12:12 AM   #164 
               Oohhh, that's why you are a moderator  Raster   Sep-30-05 12:33 AM   #187 
               You said physical termination rather than natural termination.  Crunchy Frog   Sep-30-05 12:31 AM   #185 
      Pregnancies are automatically terminated when a baby is born.  TankLV   Sep-29-05 11:50 PM   #120 
      Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-30-05 12:14 AM   #166 
      Some silly, stupid people here can't seem to figure out that  kestrel91316   Sep-30-05 12:58 AM   #208 
   WHOSE "morality"? Yours? Mine?  LynnTheDem   Sep-29-05 11:34 PM   #79 
   thank you  boilerbabe   Sep-30-05 12:28 AM   #182 
   NO!  TankLV   Sep-29-05 11:49 PM   #117 
   It's none of your business. THAT'S the morality.  Lindacooks   Sep-30-05 12:17 AM   #168 
   well then , you should not expose yourself on theDU hunny!  boilerbabe   Sep-30-05 12:40 AM   #196 
   there isn't one. n/t  Scout   Sep-30-05 12:23 AM   #175 
   We don't have to give you anything Who the f--- are YOU?  kestrel91316   Sep-30-05 12:55 AM   #207 
   I agree with you !!  boilerbabe   Sep-29-05 11:57 PM   #139 
   We can assume you're a man, then?  TankLV   Sep-29-05 11:48 PM   #113 
   Well, in fairness it wasn't asked, til now.  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:50 PM   #119 
   No.I am a woman . oh well  boilerbabe   Sep-30-05 12:38 AM   #195 
   you need to be posting on some other board , I think  boilerbabe   Sep-29-05 11:51 PM   #122 
   Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-29-05 11:53 PM   #125 
   do not give up n/t  boilerbabe   Sep-30-05 12:27 AM   #180 
   I don't know if you are religious but  FreedomAngel82   Sep-29-05 11:56 PM   #134 
   What would Bill " Book Of Virtues" Bennett say?  LiviaOlivia   Sep-30-05 12:03 AM   #154 
   a fetus cannot sustain it's own life outside the woman's body  tocqueville   Sep-30-05 12:09 AM   #161 
   we do, under certain circumstances.  Scout   Sep-30-05 12:22 AM   #174 
   Obviously you have never been pregnant  boilerbabe   Sep-30-05 12:33 AM   #186 
   If you can't figure it out to your own satisfaction, DON'T HAVE ONE  kestrel91316   Sep-30-05 12:54 AM   #204 
   That's the point...  SaveElmer   Sep-30-05 12:03 AM   # 
   i so agree  boilerbabe   Sep-30-05 12:36 AM   #193 
   That's the point...  SaveElmer   Sep-30-05 12:03 AM   #153 
   Thank you. That's all that needs to be said.  Synnical   Sep-30-05 12:07 AM   #160 
   .  alphafemale   Sep-29-05 11:00 PM   #2 
   LOL!  Lex   Sep-29-05 11:02 PM   #3 
   Got mine popping...  longship   Sep-29-05 11:02 PM   #4 
   Munching away...  nonconformist   Sep-29-05 11:35 PM   #83 
   Me too.  Cleita   Sep-29-05 11:03 PM   # 
   Yeah, this one will need popcorn.  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:03 PM   #6 
   Just one?  Rabrrrrrr   Sep-29-05 11:03 PM   #7 
   Damn you people!  StellaBlue   Sep-29-05 11:38 PM   #91 
   how about the life of the mother?  still_one   Sep-29-05 11:03 PM   #5 
   Exactly  GRLMGC   Sep-29-05 11:04 PM   #13 
   If both parents are known to carry the recessive  smoogatz   Sep-29-05 11:03 PM   #8 
   Good one!  peace frog   Sep-29-05 11:04 PM   #15 
   Under what circumstances is it moral to deny a  shraby   Sep-29-05 11:03 PM   #9 
   Under NO circumstance is that moral, ethical, or constitutional.  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:05 PM   #17 
   Ahh - another MAN telling a WOMAN what she can or can't do with HER OWN  TankLV   Sep-29-05 11:53 PM   #124 
      Read that again.  benburch   Sep-30-05 12:05 AM   #159 
      I am interested  boilerbabe   Sep-30-05 12:37 AM   #194 
   depends of the definition of medical procedure  tocqueville   Sep-29-05 11:24 PM   #56 
   Hmmm  jim3775   Sep-29-05 11:03 PM   #11 
   .  really annoyed   Sep-29-05 11:04 PM   #12 
   Under what circumstances is it immoral?  marbuc   Sep-29-05 11:04 PM   #14 
   I argue that until live birth, a fetus is not a human being.  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:08 PM   #21 
      Gosh...I can't agree with that at all...and I'm pro choice, big time!  TwoSparkles   Sep-29-05 11:15 PM   #38 
      I believe it is OK right up until the woman is in labor...  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:19 PM   #48 
      ...but it IS a human being...  TwoSparkles   Sep-29-05 11:42 PM   #101 
         Nope - the WOMAN - the person who came FIRST - is the "human being"  TankLV   Sep-29-05 11:55 PM   #130 
            No, actually--a fetus is a human being...  TwoSparkles   Sep-30-05 12:01 AM   #147 
      How about....  readmoreoften   Sep-29-05 11:25 PM   #59 
      That is almost the only circumstance under which...  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:29 PM   #66 
      What if live birth is induced?  SemiCharmedQuark   Sep-29-05 11:32 PM   #75 
         If you have a child born alive, whether induced or not...  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:36 PM   #84 
         No, my question is, can they FORCE a woman to induce rather than  SemiCharmedQuark   Sep-29-05 11:38 PM   #94 
            Late term abortions are very rare and most doctors will not do them...  cynatnite   Sep-29-05 11:43 PM   #104 
            That's not what I'm saying...  SemiCharmedQuark   Sep-29-05 11:46 PM   #109 
               They want to force the woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term...  cynatnite   Sep-29-05 11:50 PM   #118 
               Yes, but these are hypocrites, remember...  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:53 PM   #126 
                  I don't think they would...they abhor science...  cynatnite   Sep-29-05 11:57 PM   #136 
               Not once they hear the medical bills involved in such a situation....  colinmom71   Sep-30-05 12:27 AM   #181 
            Clearly NO!  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:47 PM   #110 
         Well, medical consent laws demand that the pregnant woman....  colinmom71   Sep-30-05 12:17 AM   #170 
      In those circumstances they usually know fairly early on...  cynatnite   Sep-29-05 11:38 PM   #90 
      again, who are these 8 and 9 month elective terminations?  wellstone_democrat   Sep-29-05 11:49 PM   #115 
      before I was educated about late term abortion...  cynatnite   Sep-29-05 11:55 PM   #131 
      if someone just decided--a week before her due date--that she wants an abo  Scout   Sep-30-05 12:34 AM   #189 
      Exactly right, it's a straw man injected into the discussion to promote  WildClarySage   Sep-30-05 12:54 AM   #203 
      Gee, I didn't know women could just get an abortion ANY TIME  kestrel91316   Sep-30-05 01:08 AM   #211 
      That changes for me in the latter part of the pregnancy...  cynatnite   Sep-29-05 11:20 PM   #50 
      It is because that is a slippery slope, that I would not restrict!  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:24 PM   #57 
         The earliest a baby can survive is 23 weeks.  SemiCharmedQuark   Sep-29-05 11:30 PM   #70 
         I've heard of a few surviving at 20 weeks...but it's so rare n/t  cynatnite   Sep-29-05 11:32 PM   #73 
            I've heard 23-24 weeks..  SemiCharmedQuark   Sep-29-05 11:37 PM   #86 
               In france they are working on fully artificial wombs for cattle breeding.  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:39 PM   #95 
               Yeah, sounds nice in premise...  colinmom71   Sep-30-05 12:40 AM   #197 
               It does boil down to lung development...  cynatnite   Sep-29-05 11:40 PM   #96 
               But as soon as they can hook up an atificial placenta to the umbilicus...  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:41 PM   #100 
                  Lungs do move in the uterus...  cynatnite   Sep-29-05 11:45 PM   #106 
                     They have all that under development right now.  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:49 PM   #114 
                        Do you have a source for this? I'm curious about it. n/t  cynatnite   Sep-29-05 11:50 PM   #121 
                           I read science news blurb about this some time back.  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:56 PM   #133 
                              Google shows other efforts.  benburch   Sep-30-05 12:00 AM   #144 
                              Fascinating article!  cynatnite   Sep-30-05 12:01 AM   #149 
                                 The Japanese technique was in a plastic tank...  benburch   Sep-30-05 12:04 AM   #157 
                                    Here is the story on the japanese effort...  benburch   Sep-30-05 12:11 AM   #163 
               Dont' worry so much about "weeks:  boilerbabe   Sep-30-05 12:23 AM   #176 
         I agree...law has no place in the decision...  cynatnite   Sep-29-05 11:31 PM   # 
            Just so.  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:40 PM   #97 
               Yes n/t  cynatnite   Sep-29-05 11:45 PM   #108 
      I use slightly different semantics ...............  kestrel91316   Sep-30-05 01:05 AM   #210 
   The morality of a sentient being to determine their own destiny  intheflowDU Moderator   Sep-29-05 11:04 PM   #16 
   "Under what circumstances is another persons decision  niallmac   Sep-29-05 11:07 PM   #18 
   Sorry, but until there is a functional brain present its optional surgery  Az   Sep-29-05 11:07 PM   #19 
   will that answers the question I had about bush  still_one   Sep-29-05 11:09 PM   #22 
      Heh  Az   Sep-29-05 11:10 PM   #24 
      yup, but your answer was actually quite poetic  still_one   Sep-29-05 11:11 PM   #29 
      rotflmao!!!  LynnTheDem   Sep-29-05 11:37 PM   #87 
   Isn't this question tied directly to the (personal) belief of when life  salin   Sep-29-05 11:08 PM   #20 
   I guess it depends on whose morals we are talking about  Horse with no Name   Sep-29-05 11:10 PM   #23 
   Under any circumstances and it's none of your damn business  NYC Liberal   Sep-29-05 11:10 PM   #25 
   well, any abortion that would have saved the planet from the bush family  Raster   Sep-29-05 11:10 PM   #26 
   I love jiffypop  Raster   Sep-29-05 11:11 PM   #28 
   That's up to the pregnant woman (and who she freely consults) to decide  LSdemocrat   Sep-29-05 11:13 PM   #30 
   Are You  CHIMO   Sep-29-05 11:13 PM   #31 
   You can't think of ANY?  smoogatz   Sep-29-05 11:13 PM   #32 
   Well, besides the product of rape or incest  Inland   Sep-29-05 11:19 PM   #47 
      Bingo.  smoogatz   Sep-29-05 11:21 PM   #52 
         This hits it on the nail.  readmoreoften   Sep-29-05 11:32 PM   #76 
   What is your definition of moral?  Cleita   Sep-29-05 11:13 PM   #33 
   Having the government decide reproductive freedom is immoral  zulchzulu   Sep-29-05 11:13 PM   #34 
   Nothing plausible......except rape and incest, See how easy that was?  Inland   Sep-29-05 11:14 PM   #35 
   while I share the belief that abortion is a very personal  Bluerthanblue   Sep-30-05 12:05 AM   #158 
   And the HIT and RUN award goes to:  Raster   Sep-29-05 11:15 PM   # 
   "Our waspy friend" also wins the fishing tounament n/t  jim3775   Sep-29-05 11:16 PM   #41 
   75 posts and two prestigious awards. My oh my...  Raster   Sep-29-05 11:20 PM   #49 
   I'm still here  yellowjacket7   Sep-29-05 11:21 PM   #51 
      The "morality" of abortion is subjective anyway  NYC Liberal   Sep-29-05 11:31 PM   #71 
      What's the "moral argument" against abortion?  smoogatz   Sep-29-05 11:36 PM   #85 
      How about obligatory blood marrow donations then?  alphafemale   Sep-29-05 11:40 PM   #98 
      define morality  tocqueville   Sep-29-05 11:41 PM   #99 
      Yeah - we noticed, unfortunately.  TankLV   Sep-30-05 12:02 AM   #150 
      it's been answered plenty  Scout   Sep-30-05 12:47 AM   #200 
   When the fetus is so compromised  elfin   Sep-29-05 11:15 PM   #36 
   Dupe - delte  elfin   Sep-29-05 11:15 PM   #37 
   Defending the survival of existing children  LisaLL   Sep-29-05 11:15 PM   #39 
   For You Or Her?  stepnw1f   Sep-29-05 11:16 PM   #40 
   The Question Is Meaningless, Sir  The Magistrate   Sep-29-05 11:16 PM   #42 
   THIS IS FLAMEBAIT  omega minimo   Sep-29-05 11:23 PM   #55 
   Amen.  benburch   Sep-29-05 11:31 PM   #72 
   That is not for me to decide for you. Nor is it for you to decide for me.  havocmom   Sep-29-05 11:17 PM   #43 
   Only the woman can decide the morality for herself...  cynatnite   Sep-29-05 11:17 PM   #44 
   THE MORALITY IS: IT'S NOT YOUR DECISION UNTIL IT IS  omega minimo   Sep-29-05 11:17 PM   #45 
   The following is only a personal belief:  distantearlywarning   Sep-29-05 11:22 PM   #53 
   Isn't personal freedom a moral standpoint?  amBushed   Sep-29-05 11:22 PM   #54 
   Freedom = Moral in any case?  distantearlywarning   Sep-29-05 11:32 PM   #78 
      Of course not. Don't be absurd.  amBushed   Sep-30-05 12:04 AM   #155 
         Sorry, but I disagree.  distantearlywarning   Sep-30-05 12:17 AM   #169 
   Here is a thought for you  tamtam   Sep-29-05 11:25 PM   #60 
   It's a medical procedure  CoolOnion   Sep-29-05 11:26 PM   #61 
   It is none of your damned business -- this is a matter of PRIVACY  DELUSIONAL   Sep-29-05 11:27 PM   #63 
   must say I never understood the argument of privacy in that case  tocqueville   Sep-29-05 11:53 PM   #127 
      To the contrary: that law permits it does not diminsh the privacy.  mondo joe   Sep-30-05 12:00 AM   #146 
         "if a woman can find a doctor willing to perform the procedure"  tocqueville   Sep-30-05 12:24 AM   #178 
   The moral standpoint is autonomy over one's own body. That is more  mondo joe   Sep-29-05 11:28 PM   #65 
   LOL So who exactly is consenting to your idea of what is moral?  Solly Mack   Sep-29-05 11:30 PM   #67 
   Okay, abortion is wrong. Let's go to the next question.  readmoreoften   Sep-29-05 11:56 PM   #132 
      What do you mean by this comment?  Solly Mack   Sep-30-05 12:16 AM   #167 
         The comment is meant for the OP, sorry.  readmoreoften   Sep-30-05 12:33 AM   #188 
            Okies! Got it! Thank you!  Solly Mack   Sep-30-05 12:36 AM   #192 
   How is someone else's abortion your problem?  devilgrrl   Sep-29-05 11:32 PM   #74 
   Oh boy  pro_blue_guy   Sep-29-05 11:35 PM   #81 
   Well, your last paragraph  FlaGranny   Sep-30-05 12:42 AM   #198 
   When it's a dog fetus!  StellaBlue   Sep-29-05 11:35 PM   #82 
   You should ask George W. Bush.  cat_girl25   Sep-29-05 11:37 PM   #89 
   in what way is it immoral?  lionesspriyanka   Sep-29-05 11:38 PM   #92 
   Under what circumstance is it not moral?  CornField   Sep-29-05 11:38 PM   #93 
   Abortion has a long history  Coyote_Bandit   Sep-29-05 11:42 PM   #102 
   Who cares - it's NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS what a woman does  TankLV   Sep-29-05 11:47 PM   #111 
   Okay, it's a moral decision to have an abortion when  blonndee   Sep-29-05 11:47 PM   #112 
   What about physical abuse?  FreedomAngel82   Sep-29-05 11:52 PM   #123 
   Could someone please get me the bunny/pancake picture?  missb   Sep-29-05 11:54 PM   #128 
   What are your morals? You cite incest and rape.  nonconformist   Sep-29-05 11:56 PM   #135 
   Whenever a woman decides she wants to get one for any reason.  bearfan454   Sep-29-05 11:57 PM   #137 
   Just because women are capable of conception  redwitch   Sep-29-05 11:57 PM   #138 
   Perfect response IMO....WE WON'T GO BACK!  erinlough   Sep-30-05 12:01 AM   #148 
   If Roe is reversed, I predict riots. . .  brensgrrl   Sep-30-05 12:55 AM   #205 
   Just out of curiosity, do you think WAR is moral?  CoolOnion   Sep-29-05 11:58 PM   #141 
   I think a popular conservative view...  4nic8em   Sep-29-05 11:58 PM   #142 
   If you view abortion from a "moral" point of view  ccbombs   Sep-29-05 11:58 PM   #143 
   Try having one n/t  boilerbabe   Sep-30-05 12:00 AM   #145 
   No, no, no  electron_blue   Sep-30-05 12:02 AM   #152 
   What moral standpoint exists for interfering with the right to bodily  WildClarySage   Sep-30-05 12:12 AM   #165 
   Okay heres for me  DanCa   Sep-30-05 12:17 AM   #171 
   I can't believe this thread is still up!  Cleita   Sep-30-05 12:20 AM   #172 
   I hope my answer wasn't offensive. (nt)  DanCa   Sep-30-05 12:26 AM   #179 
      Not at all.  missb   Sep-30-05 12:53 AM   #202 
      No you weren't offensive .  Cleita   Sep-30-05 12:55 AM   #206 
         Agreed i am just so tired of the moral one upmanship.  DanCa   Sep-30-05 01:03 AM   #209 
   i don't see how it's IMmoral!  genevat   Sep-30-05 12:21 AM   #173 
   is it moral to force a woman to bear an unwanted pregnancy?  thedailyshow   Sep-30-05 12:24 AM   #177 
   Until we reduce or eliminate the non-choice killing of non-fetuses...  Dr Fate   Sep-30-05 12:28 AM   #183 
   if you consider abortion to be immoral-  MarsThe Cat   Sep-30-05 12:30 AM   #184 
   Since America is 50-50 on this issue...  SnoopDog   Sep-30-05 12:35 AM   #191 
   I don't have a uterus  impeachdubya   Sep-30-05 12:44 AM   #199 
   If you can't figure it out, then you'd better be sure to never have one  kestrel91316   Sep-30-05 12:52 AM   #201 
   Locking  The Magistrate   Sep-30-05 01:08 AM   #212 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2010 Democratic Underground, LLC