Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-22-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
| 33. Is it reactionary to actually want to see some stands taken? |
|
Roberts looks like a nice guy, but he represdents an element that is out to turn the USD back to the early 20th Century.
And Democrats are supposed to say "Sure, go ahead" just because people like you are so worried about appearances?
Hell's bells. If that kind of political squishiness is your definition of rational, I'll proudly accept the label of "Hot headed reactionary."
|
| -So are Feingold and Leahy DINO's? |
WI_DEM |
Sep-22-05 12:03 PM |
#0 |
 -
Yeah, but Kucinich wouldn't have voted for Roberts!!!!!!!! |
Vash the Stampede |
Sep-22-05 12:06 PM |
#1 |
  -
Perhaps he would have when he was pro-life |
Freddie Stubbs |
Sep-22-05 12:17 PM |
#7 |
| -
Remember.. |
samplebytes |
Sep-22-05 12:07 PM |
#2 |
| -
don't get me wrong |
WI_DEM |
Sep-22-05 12:11 PM |
#3 |
| -
I think you should change your name to... |
tx_dem41 |
Sep-22-05 12:22 PM |
#9 |
| -
I wish people would be less reactionary and more pragmatic |
Mr_Spock |
Sep-22-05 12:13 PM |
#5 |
| -
My son has |
mmonk |
Sep-22-05 12:30 PM |
#10 |
| -
They couldn't possibly have stopped him no matter what. |
Mr_Spock |
Sep-22-05 12:41 PM |
#17 |
| -
So I'm still listening |
mmonk |
Sep-22-05 12:45 PM |
#21 |
| -
Because it's a bargaining point for the next nominee |
Zen |
Sep-22-05 12:55 PM |
#28 |
| -
As it noted above, it is a bargaining point. |
Mr_Spock |
Sep-22-05 01:03 PM |
#32 |
| -
Bargaining point. Like those pukes are going to bargain with dems? |
greekspeak |
Sep-22-05 07:57 PM |
#53 |
| -
Whatever happened to |
Tomee450 |
Sep-22-05 01:31 PM |
#41 |
| -
There is much to be accomplished by opposing |
Armstead |
Sep-22-05 12:41 PM |
#18 |
| -
I have to say |
never_get_over_it |
Sep-22-05 12:35 PM |
#11 |
| -
Well said!! |
titoresque |
Sep-22-05 12:43 PM |
#20 |
| -
I'm so glad our politicians can see farther ahead than just this nominee |
Zen |
Sep-22-05 12:52 PM |
#27 |
| -
Thank you! I may be naive, but I don't understand why every |
Rainbowreflect |
Sep-22-05 01:00 PM |
#29 |
| -
I don't think you're a bit naive |
never_get_over_it |
Sep-22-05 01:21 PM |
#40 |
| -
Bush will put up a conservative regardless of what Dems do |
Armstead |
Sep-22-05 12:39 PM |
#14 |
| -
Thanks for posting this....I'm interested too...Seems some people |
Rowdyboy |
Sep-22-05 12:13 PM |
#4 |
| -
I say blah blah blah to what you just said |
greekspeak |
Sep-22-05 07:43 PM |
#50 |
| -
The very good reason for this whole thing is to pick their battles. |
kick-ass-bob |
Sep-22-05 12:15 PM |
#6 |
| -
Thank you! Good to see when people get it.....No way to win on Roberts |
Rowdyboy |
Sep-22-05 11:14 PM |
#56 |
| -
Since the courts are the battle of our generation, |
mmonk |
Sep-22-05 12:19 PM |
#8 |
| -
No, they're fools |
Walt Starr |
Sep-22-05 12:36 PM |
#12 |
| -
I don't know |
Armstead |
Sep-22-05 12:36 PM |
#13 |
| -
Leahy wasn't on Cheney's shitlist, he was on Cheney's anthrax list. |
blm |
Sep-22-05 12:39 PM |
#15 |
| -
Ha Ha |
Snotcicles |
Sep-22-05 12:46 PM |
#23 |
| -
Roberts is no worse than his predecessor |
warrens |
Sep-22-05 12:41 PM |
#16 |
| -
Yet n/t |
Snotcicles |
Sep-22-05 12:47 PM |
#24 |
| -
You can vote your conscience. |
mmonk |
Sep-22-05 12:51 PM |
#26 |
| -
Vote Conscience....BINGO! |
Armstead |
Sep-22-05 01:09 PM |
#35 |
| -
What is your alternative WRT the Roberts nominaion? |
Mr_Spock |
Sep-22-05 01:18 PM |
#39 |
| -
It would not have stopped him. |
Armstead |
Sep-22-05 05:18 PM |
#48 |
| -
The true test will be |
WilliamPitt |
Sep-22-05 12:42 PM |
#19 |
| -
Try to convince the flying off the handle hot-head reactionaries that |
Zen |
Sep-22-05 12:46 PM |
#22 |
| -
Is it reactionary to actually want to see some stands taken? |
Armstead |
Sep-22-05 01:06 PM |
#33 |
| -
It's meaningless to take a stand now when the next nominee is so crucial!! |
Mr_Spock |
Sep-22-05 01:12 PM |
#36 |
| -
A trade? Hahahaha.....It takes two to trade |
Armstead |
Sep-22-05 05:23 PM |
#49 |
| -
Please tell me you are not that naive. Please. |
greekspeak |
Sep-22-05 07:51 PM |
#51 |
| -
And there is no reason |
mmonk |
Sep-22-05 01:07 PM |
#34 |
| -
Which ADA rulings do you object to most vocally? |
wuushew |
Sep-22-05 01:15 PM |
#37 |
| -
Uncontrolled emotion will not make people want to vote for Dems |
Mr_Spock |
Sep-22-05 01:15 PM |
#38 |
| -
But continued display of lack |
Tomee450 |
Sep-22-05 01:45 PM |
#44 |
| -
Thank you. Some DUers clearly have more to lose with a Roberts court |
greekspeak |
Sep-22-05 07:53 PM |
#52 |
| -
Why is fighting nominees over ideology legitimate? |
wuushew |
Sep-22-05 12:49 PM |
#25 |
| -
Anyone who disagrees with me is a DINO. |
Arkana |
Sep-22-05 01:01 PM |
#30 |
| -
My guess is that Feingold is on a mission |
sadiesworld |
Sep-22-05 01:01 PM |
#31 |
| -
I wonder about DiFi but Leahy is no DINO... |
frictionlessO |
Sep-22-05 01:39 PM |
#42 |
| -
DiFi voted against Roberts. |
Crunchy Frog |
Sep-22-05 08:38 PM |
#54 |
| -
Ok totally confused now... n/t |
frictionlessO |
Sep-22-05 09:38 PM |
#55 |
| -
on this, yes, in general, no |
MisterP |
Sep-22-05 01:44 PM |
#43 |
| -
Maybe they're just Lazy! |
zidzi |
Sep-22-05 01:46 PM |
#45 |
| -
No for Feingold - wait and see with Leahy |
mvd |
Sep-22-05 02:15 PM |
#46 |
| -
They're bewildering, is what they are. |
Zhade |
Sep-22-05 02:28 PM |
#47 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread