You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #35: Thanks. So there was nothing legally wrong with [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Thanks. So there was nothing legally wrong with
Getting head in the Oval?

I know it would be an irresistable thing to me were I to ever find myself President.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Why Roberts Could be Great!!! smartvoter  Sep-18-05 09:35 PM   #0 
  - Rightwing Jezus Land!  stepnw1f   Sep-18-05 09:38 PM   #1 
  - ROFL -- and talk about "irony"!!!  understandinglife   Sep-18-05 09:39 PM   #2 
  - They would need a new word for irony -- something stronger!!! nt  smartvoter   Sep-18-05 09:52 PM   #11 
  - Not untouchable  maine_raptor   Sep-18-05 09:40 PM   #3 
  - Maybe but then he could go really hard right to overcompensate  Ksec   Sep-18-05 09:40 PM   #4 
  - Don't be too sure!  mazzarro   Sep-18-05 09:43 PM   #5 
  - right, and look at what Phyllis Schlafly has done for women, not to mentio  electron_blue   Sep-18-05 09:46 PM   #9 
  - I see it the opposite way  jim3775   Sep-18-05 09:44 PM   #6 
  - Perhaps. But this does add a certain unknown to the equation. nt  smartvoter   Sep-18-05 09:47 PM   #10 
  - If he feels that negatively about his sexuality then he would...  LiberalFighter   Sep-18-05 09:53 PM   #12 
  - But with a lifetime appointment...........  maine_raptor   Sep-18-05 09:56 PM   #13 
     - Or at the very least, rule far more liberally than anyone is expecting?  smartvoter   Sep-18-05 10:01 PM   #17 
        - My thoughts too, smartvoter.  maine_raptor   Sep-18-05 10:10 PM   #19 
           - Stuck with him anyway, so let's cross our fingers and hope for the best.nt  smartvoter   Sep-18-05 10:22 PM   #20 
  - Plus, this photo isn't the in-denial type of look. He could be  smartvoter   Sep-18-05 10:43 PM   #23 
  - Nope, he's part of the "ruling" class that doesn't have the same rules  Lars39   Sep-18-05 09:44 PM   #7 
  - That would be awesome!  Pushed To The Left   Sep-18-05 09:45 PM   #8 
  - self delete  smartvoter   Sep-18-05 10:09 PM   #18 
  - HEY! You can't drop in with a "Roberts gay photo" and NOT provide a link!  fob   Sep-18-05 09:59 PM   #14 
  - Sorry. Just added to the original... nt  smartvoter   Sep-18-05 10:01 PM   #15 
  - Thanks and if this gets airtime, bush* will pull this nom faster than  fob   Sep-18-05 10:32 PM   #21 
     - The only thing faster than the speed of light is the awarding of a  smartvoter   Sep-18-05 10:35 PM   #22 
  - Go here  maine_raptor   Sep-18-05 10:01 PM   #16 
  - You asked us to  hootinholler   Sep-18-05 10:58 PM   #24 
  - He can be removed, see post #3  maine_raptor   Sep-18-05 11:00 PM   #25 
     - Wouldn't they have to find serious grounds for that? nt  smartvoter   Sep-18-05 11:02 PM   #28 
        - "Impeachment is what the House says it is" - Gerald Ford  maine_raptor   Sep-18-05 11:07 PM   #29 
           - Perjury, wasn't it?  hootinholler   Sep-18-05 11:18 PM   #32 
              - Perjury requires that the lie be about a "material fact" in a case  maine_raptor   Sep-18-05 11:22 PM   #33 
                 - Thanks. So there was nothing legally wrong with  hootinholler   Sep-18-05 11:29 PM   #35 
                    - LOL!! nt  smartvoter   Sep-18-05 11:31 PM   #36 
                    - As long as you don't have to testify under oath about it  maine_raptor   Sep-18-05 11:32 PM   #37 
                    - Dupe, please delete  maine_raptor   Sep-18-05 11:32 PM   #38 
  - He could dress his robes up like Liberace and it wouldn't change things.  Straight Shooter   Sep-18-05 11:02 PM   #26 
  - J Edgar Hoover was gay. And he was a fascist mastermind.  Octafish   Sep-18-05 11:02 PM   #27 
  - Perhaps someone could find him an irresistable stud with a  alittlelark   Sep-18-05 11:13 PM   #30 
  - So...he would just be ANOTHER homosexual fascist  mitchum   Sep-18-05 11:17 PM   #31 
  - For those thinking a "Gay" Roberts would make no difference on the Court  maine_raptor   Sep-18-05 11:26 PM   #34 
  - Great? He will be FABULOUS in his satin pink robe.  Neshanic   Sep-18-05 11:33 PM   #39 
  - Nah,  Ms. Toad   Sep-19-05 12:59 AM   #40 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC