You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: and people who did own their older homes free and clear [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. and people who did own their older homes free and clear
have technically "abandoned" them by 'leaving them'..so eminent domain will kick in to "salvage" property ..and put it to a "better use". :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Can Somebody Explain The "Lottery" Thing? K8-EEE  Sep-16-05 11:28 AM   #0 
  - SOMEONE owns the houses & land  maxsolomon   Sep-16-05 11:29 AM   #1 
  - and people who did own their older homes free and clear  SoCalDem   Sep-16-05 11:32 AM   #4 
     - Completely untrue.  MercutioATC   Sep-16-05 11:36 AM   #9 
        - Legally, yes...but eminent domain will rear its ugly head here  SoCalDem   Sep-16-05 11:39 AM   #12 
           - Except for parcels near the levees needed to expand them, you're on.  MercutioATC   Sep-16-05 11:41 AM   #15 
              - Pretty soon, we will all have careened into the "next" disaster  SoCalDem   Sep-16-05 11:48 AM   #16 
                 - Agreed, but this is something that people will keep with them a long time.  MercutioATC   Sep-16-05 11:51 AM   #19 
  - Republicans do not want poor people returning  SoCalDem   Sep-16-05 11:31 AM   #2 
  - Did you not listen to the speech?  MercutioATC   Sep-16-05 11:33 AM   #6 
     - If you have no money and no job, how will you "rebuild"?  SoCalDem   Sep-16-05 11:35 AM   #8 
        - Most of us use mortages...  MercutioATC   Sep-16-05 11:38 AM   #10 
  - He was speaking of federally-owned land.  MercutioATC   Sep-16-05 11:31 AM   #3 
  - Does anyone know what federally owned land he was talking about?  Inland   Sep-16-05 11:33 AM   #5 
  - No idea.  MercutioATC   Sep-16-05 11:35 AM   #7 
     - Well, it depends on the land, and the need.  Inland   Sep-16-05 11:38 AM   #11 
        - Well, he can't give away privately-owned land...  MercutioATC   Sep-16-05 11:40 AM   #14 
           - Of course he can give away privately owned land.  Inland   Sep-16-05 11:49 AM   #17 
           - and i suspect they'll buy it for almost nothing  uncle ray   Sep-16-05 12:44 PM   #22 
              - Someone is going to buy it for almost nothing.  Inland   Sep-16-05 01:04 PM   #23 
           - dupe  Inland   Sep-16-05 11:49 AM   #18 
  - Exactly. This is not a new practice in the US -  comsymp   Sep-16-05 11:39 AM   #13 
  - I took it to mean a lottery on gov lands  Deb   Sep-16-05 12:01 PM   #20 
  - My guess  creeksneakers2   Sep-16-05 12:12 PM   #21 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC