You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: Yes. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. Yes.
Children over 18 are not named in divorce proceedings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Sheehan Divorce????? jackster  Aug-14-05 05:46 AM   #0 
  - So what?  Pigwidgeon   Aug-14-05 05:49 AM   #1 
  - Is it possible for her to have filed for divorce while in Crawford?  wake.up.america   Aug-14-05 05:52 AM   #5 
  - go to the links....  jackster   Aug-14-05 05:58 AM   #11 
     - no, he is the PETITIONER  thecrow   Aug-14-05 07:44 AM   #38 
        - sorry you are right...  jackster   Aug-14-05 07:52 AM   #41 
  - You are right....  jackster   Aug-14-05 05:57 AM   #10 
  - Exactly. These are the same people....  emdee   Aug-14-05 09:37 AM   #114 
  - Death of a child is a huge stress on a marriage  yvr girl   Aug-14-05 05:50 AM   #2 
  - 100% agreement.  cornermouse   Aug-14-05 05:52 AM   #6 
  - yes, it is their business  jackster   Aug-14-05 06:03 AM   #14 
     - I hope you didn't take that personally  Pigwidgeon   Aug-14-05 06:30 AM   #22 
  - If this is true, and it is THE Cindy Sheehan  KitchenWitch   Aug-14-05 05:51 AM   #3 
  - Oh no, a death of a child often results in divorce  Bluebear   Aug-14-05 05:51 AM   #4 
  - Yes. May they both find peace.  fooj   Aug-14-05 06:04 AM   #15 
  - And I've even heard of divorces among couples who suffered the loss  Montauk6   Aug-14-05 05:53 AM   #7 
  - Let the 2,3,4 time divorced repukes make a deal outta this (if true)  Mika   Aug-14-05 05:54 AM   #8 
  - good point! thanks!  jackster   Aug-14-05 06:04 AM   #17 
  - "Dissolution without kids"???  pnorman   Aug-14-05 05:57 AM   #9 
  - Thank you so much, pnorman  Bluebear   Aug-14-05 05:58 AM   #12 
  - I wonder...  Tandalayo_Scheisskopf   Aug-14-05 06:02 AM   #13 
  - Wasn't there a case a few years ago  China_cat   Aug-14-05 06:23 AM   #21 
     - T'was that woman who gave story to California paper  juajen   Aug-14-05 07:54 AM   #43 
        - Yes, that's exactly it.  China_cat   Aug-14-05 08:39 AM   #78 
  - Here's a little more:  pnorman   Aug-14-05 06:18 AM   #20 
  - I hate to throw a monkeywrench into the works  POAS   Aug-14-05 07:22 AM   #31 
     - Yes.  tanyev   Aug-14-05 07:30 AM   #35 
     - "Without Kids" is not a legal term.  BiggJawn   Aug-14-05 09:10 AM   #104 
        - I just did a search and found out that it seems to be for this county.  OmmmSweetOmmm   Aug-14-05 09:31 AM   #111 
           - nice find.......thanks for the defense......n/t  POAS   Aug-14-05 10:05 AM   #119 
           - Who'd a thunk it?  BiggJawn   Aug-14-05 12:00 PM   #135 
           - Lol! This just lets you know how far the dumbing down of America has gone  OmmmSweetOmmm   Aug-14-05 12:02 PM   #136 
           - Weird.  senseandsensibility   Aug-14-05 12:23 PM   #141 
  - it means no kids under 18  WolverineDG   Aug-14-05 09:37 AM   #116 
  - I believe the ex-husband still supports her and what she is doing  bluestateguy   Aug-14-05 06:04 AM   #16 
  - okay, so maybe I'm the only one  jackster   Aug-14-05 06:11 AM   #18 
  - well, you're probably right  latebloomer   Aug-14-05 08:58 AM   #95 
  - Her husband is not Casey's father..  SoCalDem   Aug-14-05 09:08 AM   #103 
  - Dang...  headin_south   Aug-14-05 10:27 AM   #128 
  - My concern: RW attack dogs will characterize protest as "meltdown"  HamdenRice   Aug-14-05 06:12 AM   #19 
  - Most likely, this is a different person altogether,  pnorman   Aug-14-05 06:46 AM   #25 
  - If this is "our" Cindy  Libby2   Aug-14-05 06:39 AM   #23 
  - afaik  evilqueen   Aug-14-05 06:41 AM   #24 
     - I agree.....n/t  Libby2   Aug-14-05 06:53 AM   #26 
  - Be of good cheer. The fascists and Christofascists who will...  newswolf56   Aug-14-05 06:53 AM   #27 
  - jackster, how did you come across this info?  Junkdrawer   Aug-14-05 06:59 AM   #28 
  - I clicked on a  jackster   Aug-14-05 07:54 AM   #42 
  - When it comes to divorce..  rateyes   Aug-14-05 07:09 AM   #29 
  - How is this relevant?  fujiyama   Aug-14-05 07:18 AM   #30 
  - You Are Exactly Right  ThomWV   Aug-14-05 07:56 AM   #44 
  - Bullshit.  H2O Man   Aug-14-05 07:22 AM   #32 
  - okay so maybe it isn't an issue  jackster   Aug-14-05 07:56 AM   #45 
     - It's none of your business.  H2O Man   Aug-14-05 08:18 AM   #57 
  - Wow, George, your "war" is killing people, breaking up families,  Vickers   Aug-14-05 07:23 AM   #33 
  - The Military's divorce rate has soared. Yep, Family Values..........  OmmmSweetOmmm   Aug-14-05 07:42 AM   #37 
  - It's not that much of a surprise  union_maid   Aug-14-05 07:26 AM   #34 
  - Now comes the smear and watch out shes catholic too.  DanCa   Aug-14-05 07:40 AM   #36 
  - The Great Divider should be proud...  kentuck   Aug-14-05 07:46 AM   #39 
  - maybe they have grown in different directions..or maybe just cindy sheehan  flordehinojos   Aug-14-05 07:52 AM   #40 
  - This thread is in bad taste & something about the filing doesn't look  OmmmSweetOmmm   Aug-14-05 07:59 AM   #46 
  - how is this in bad taste?  jackster   Aug-14-05 08:02 AM   #47 
  - If you like staying informed with a tabloid mindset. Her being separated  OmmmSweetOmmm   Aug-14-05 08:08 AM   #49 
  - Wasn't Reagan divorced?? Gingrinch four or five times??  ClassWarrior   Aug-14-05 08:10 AM   #51 
     - Warner of VA 3 times, Bob Barr....... ....... nt  OmmmSweetOmmm   Aug-14-05 08:19 AM   #58 
  - Yeah, Ken Starr "stayed informed" of other shit that was none of his...  ClassWarrior   Aug-14-05 08:09 AM   #50 
     - Lol! Or J. Edgar Hoover and his "private files"..probably salivating  OmmmSweetOmmm   Aug-14-05 08:20 AM   #60 
  - Amen  wovenpaint   Aug-14-05 08:15 AM   #55 
  - it looks like a spoof site  datasuspect   Aug-14-05 12:39 PM   #146 
  - This actually looks like an "empty nest" divorce to me  eridani   Aug-14-05 08:06 AM   #48 
  - Her private live is nobody's business  Mr.Green93   Aug-14-05 08:12 AM   #52 
  - What the FUCK?  johnnie   Aug-14-05 08:13 AM   #53 
  - Well said. n/t  H2O Man   Aug-14-05 08:20 AM   #59 
  - Thank you johnnie, Exactly! n/t  OmmmSweetOmmm   Aug-14-05 08:22 AM   #62 
  - Wow  ohio_liberal   Aug-14-05 08:13 AM   #54 
  - Not Uncommon  Alamom   Aug-14-05 08:17 AM   #56 
  - Hi Alamom!  johnnie   Aug-14-05 08:21 AM   #61 
  - Thank you...n/t  Alamom   Aug-14-05 08:24 AM   #64 
  - Welcome to DU!  DemonFighterLives   Aug-14-05 10:07 AM   #120 
  - wow....  jackster   Aug-14-05 08:23 AM   #63 
  - The issue isn't  H2O Man   Aug-14-05 08:26 AM   #65 
  - Boundaries?  jackster   Aug-14-05 08:28 AM   #67 
     - "repulsed"  H2O Man   Aug-14-05 08:31 AM   #69 
        - you find this in bad taste  jackster   Aug-14-05 08:33 AM   #71 
           - "in bad taste"  H2O Man   Aug-14-05 08:55 AM   #91 
  - No, you didn't make a mistake in joining  ohio_liberal   Aug-14-05 08:26 AM   #66 
  - Wow.... Meanspirited? Eatting our own? It seems that believe it  OmmmSweetOmmm   Aug-14-05 08:31 AM   #68 
  - Unfortunately, it's a matter of public record  ohio_liberal   Aug-14-05 08:33 AM   #70 
  - Thanks Ohio Liberal  jackster   Aug-14-05 08:36 AM   #72 
  - I think emotions are running very high  ohio_liberal   Aug-14-05 08:37 AM   #73 
  - can you explain  datasuspect   Aug-14-05 12:27 PM   #144 
  - I don't know if you saw my other post. The filing doesn't look right to me  OmmmSweetOmmm   Aug-14-05 08:37 AM   #74 
  - Don't know if it's real or not  ohio_liberal   Aug-14-05 08:38 AM   #76 
  - And if it is real  ohio_liberal   Aug-14-05 08:41 AM   #80 
  - I hope this is the case...  jackster   Aug-14-05 08:41 AM   #79 
  - this smacks of Rove...the terminology is so ..not legalese,  yellowdogintexas   Aug-14-05 09:20 AM   #109 
     - On edit... Dissolution without kids is actually a filing type in  OmmmSweetOmmm   Aug-14-05 09:23 AM   #110 
  - According to the links...  jackster   Aug-14-05 08:44 AM   #83 
     - Yeah, I understand that  ohio_liberal   Aug-14-05 08:46 AM   #85 
  - Private matters are private matters.  jackster   Aug-14-05 08:38 AM   #77 
     - And you are assuming that this is a burden to her. And yes, I agree the  OmmmSweetOmmm   Aug-14-05 08:43 AM   #82 
        - Maybe your divorce was no burden to you,  jackster   Aug-14-05 08:51 AM   #86 
           - I've been on this planet for 53 years, so don't play the age card with me.  OmmmSweetOmmm   Aug-14-05 08:56 AM   #92 
              - Wow...  jackster   Aug-14-05 09:00 AM   #97 
  - Damn you jackster for posting this information!  fishnfla   Aug-14-05 08:52 AM   #87 
     - thanks for the laugh....  jackster   Aug-14-05 08:56 AM   #93 
  - Don't let this become the story...  kentuck   Aug-14-05 08:38 AM   #75 
  - This Post Stinks. I Mean Gross. You Sound Excited...  DistressedAmerican   Aug-14-05 08:43 AM   #81 
  - I'm sorry you feel this way....  jackster   Aug-14-05 08:54 AM   #88 
  - I agree with the other posters. Its the fact that you seem to be  Scout1071   Aug-14-05 10:02 AM   #118 
     - HE IS NOT MY PRESIDENT!  jackster   Aug-14-05 10:18 AM   #123 
        - Of course they had it. Why wouldn't they try to smear a grieving mother?  Scout1071   Aug-14-05 10:23 AM   #125 
           - Scout, this is a discussion board last I checked  DemonFighterLives   Aug-14-05 10:27 AM   #127 
              - A discussion akin to the one on the shape of Clinton's penis...  ClassWarrior   Aug-14-05 11:35 AM   #130 
                 - I don't know where that's coming from and nasty as well  DemonFighterLives   Aug-14-05 12:51 PM   #149 
  - It sounded to me  ohio_liberal   Aug-14-05 08:55 AM   #90 
  - Ooooooh. Divorce. See ya', Cindy. Morality now weighs fatally against you.  Karmadillo   Aug-14-05 08:44 AM   #84 
  - So? Her husband's an asshole.  Iris   Aug-14-05 08:54 AM   #89 
  - Dont forget, Casey was his son too  fishnfla   Aug-14-05 08:59 AM   #96 
     - No shit.  Iris   Aug-14-05 09:06 AM   #101 
        - Who knows Iris?  fishnfla   Aug-14-05 09:12 AM   #106 
           - That's fine.  Iris   Aug-14-05 10:15 AM   #121 
           - NO- he is making a statement and it is one of control.  TheGoldenRule   Aug-14-05 12:13 PM   #138 
  - Posted at michellemalkin.com at 06:22 AM...  Junkdrawer   Aug-14-05 08:56 AM   #94 
  - Her source is exactly the one I posted....  jackster   Aug-14-05 09:04 AM   #99 
  - Some support for you here, jackster. Best wishes to you as your  coffeenap   Aug-14-05 09:33 AM   #112 
  - The letter from the family  ohio_liberal   Aug-14-05 09:11 AM   #105 
  - Dissolution without KIDS?  thecrow   Aug-14-05 12:43 PM   #148 
  - Sorry, jackster, for the attacks!  latebloomer   Aug-14-05 09:01 AM   #98 
  - thank you....  jackster   Aug-14-05 09:05 AM   #100 
     - you're welcome!  latebloomer   Aug-14-05 09:07 AM   #102 
  - Is this an attempt at invading people's lives like with Terry Schiavo?  RSchewe   Aug-14-05 09:12 AM   #107 
  - In the real world, it's nobody's business  ohio_liberal   Aug-14-05 09:15 AM   #108 
  - FOX is on the phone with Mr. Sheehan as we speak....?  kentuck   Aug-14-05 09:35 AM   #113 
  - self-delete  ohio_liberal   Aug-14-05 09:37 AM   #115 
  - If her husband filed the papers while she  LibDemAlways   Aug-14-05 10:01 AM   #117 
  - Yes and also fits with the smearboats playbook.  DemonFighterLives   Aug-14-05 10:22 AM   #124 
  - Another fine mess to lay at Bush's doorstep!  Generic Other   Aug-14-05 10:15 AM   #122 
  - What really gives it an air of fakeness is that in divorce papers  Horse with no Name   Aug-14-05 10:25 AM   #126 
  - And note "Dissolution without KIDS..."  Pigwidgeon   Aug-14-05 11:33 AM   #129 
  - Yes, I noticed the "kids" too  senseandsensibility   Aug-14-05 11:42 AM   #131 
     - See my post #111. There is a filing type for that in the county.  OmmmSweetOmmm   Aug-14-05 11:49 AM   #132 
  - I been divorce before and this doesn't sound like official divorce paper  Rainscents   Aug-14-05 12:23 PM   #142 
  - ...and this has what to do with the war? n/t  RSchewe   Aug-14-05 11:52 AM   #133 
  - Four Questions:  RandomKoolzip   Aug-14-05 11:53 AM   #134 
  - It's a smear attempt.  TheGoldenRule   Aug-14-05 12:08 PM   #137 
  - If it's true, there's probably a little "incentive" coming his way.  pox americana   Aug-14-05 12:17 PM   #139 
     - Another Winner!  Pigwidgeon   Aug-14-05 12:22 PM   #140 
  - how is this relevant to w's hardon for fucking murder?  datasuspect   Aug-14-05 12:24 PM   #143 
  - With all due respect, this is just fodder for the RW opponents  steve2470   Aug-14-05 12:27 PM   #145 
  - "solanocourts.com?"  datasuspect   Aug-14-05 12:41 PM   #147 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC