169. i really don't understand why we must vote on both
packages of rules together. the first bundle are basic good sense and seem non controversial. the second bundle have political consequenxex that will hit some candidates harder than others making them much more controversial. this is like bundling the money for the troops in iraq with the money to rebuild iraq. bush is doing that to insure the second package passes. maybe that's a bad comparison as i don't mean to compare you with bush but the result is the same. it's that all or nothing choice that bugs me the most.
won't you reconsider and break them up into group 1 and 2?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
