You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #39: "I have no idea how we can continue to let this happen."-James Moore [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
39. "I have no idea how we can continue to let this happen."-James Moore
58% of the American people opposed the Iraq war BEFORE the invasion. I will never forget that stat. Feb. '03. Before all the lies were exposed, before the full costs were known. 58%!

About half of that 58% opposed the war outright. The other half would only approve a UN peacekeeping mission (world consensus)--not pre-emptive, unilateral war by Bush.

63% of the American people oppose torture UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. May '04. Not a fearful people. Not a people that gives up their sense of justice, ethics and lawfulness easily under pressure.

Now, how is it that we had war anyway--a bloody, awful war in which over 100,000 Iraqis were slaughtered in the initial bombing alone (according to the British doctors' report), and that continues to this day in a bloody military occupation--despite the great majority of Americans opposing it?

And how is it that our country is torturing people, people who are being held without charge for indefinite periods--torture of innocents, in other words--and torture with not even the slightest shred of necessity--with the great majority of Americans opposing torture UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES?

Where is "consent of the governed"? Where is majority rule? Where is democracy in this picture?

Meanwhile--while the Bush Cartel plotted a war that the great majority of Americans opposed even before they knew that there were no weapons of mass destruction, and while the Bush Cartel furthermore instituted the torture of prisoners in violation of dozens of laws, as well as the will of the great majority of Americans--buddies of the Bush Cartel, major donors and campaign chairs who owned electronic voting machine companies, forced the states to sign contracts in which the tabulation of the votes in the 2004 presidential election would be controlled with "trade secret," proprietary software--software so secret that not even Secretaries of State and other election officials could review it.

Bush's "pod people" in Congress readily agreed that major Bush donors and supporters should count all the votes in secret--and acted to prevent even the slightest control of this kind of "election"--say, a paper trail that might make such "elections" recountable and auditable. Democrats in Congress whimpered a bit about the lack of a paper trail but raised no ruckus about unauditable elections or even about Bushites counting all the votes in secret.

Hard to figure the Democrats--the word "suicidal" comes to mind--but perhaps the $4 billion in porkbarrel money to the states--to be poured into the pockets of the major Bush donors who own the voting machine companies, through the hands of both Democratic and Republican election officials--goes some way to explain the silence of the Democratic leadership on the important question of who would be counting Americans' votes, and how, in 2004. Also likely influential: the lavish lobbying junkets, and wining, dining and future jobs offers for those who signed over Americans' right to vote to private corporations to hold as a "trade secret."

This transformation of the election system into a non-transparent, unverifiable, and also unreliable and extremely hackable, private boondoggle controlled by Bushites went virtually unremarked and black-holed by the US corporate news monopolies. A few alarmed techies and Ph.D.'s cried foul. They were ignored (except by California Secretary of State Kevin Shelly, who sued one of the Bushite voting machine companies, Diebold, for lying to him about the security of their machines--but he was soon forced out of office by rumors about his dishonesty and lack of money to defend himself with--one of the last honest election officials in the country, abandoned by his own party, whose other California leaders cowered in their closets for fear of similar Bushite black ops against THEM, or were too busy doling out fat state contracts to Diebold and brethren for all sorts of state electronic systems.)

Then they held the 2004 "election." The Democrats had blown the Republicans away in new voter registration in 2004, nearly 60/40. People were flocking to the Democratic Party in hatred of the Bush Cartel and its war, and determined to oust them. Dick Cheney flew off the Hawaii, two days before the election, dropping newsturds along the way about how Hawaii was promising to turn "red," and he was going there to stump for votes (Hawaii!), but, in reality, getting himself into position for a major "terrorist alert" shutdown of the west coast vote, should the electronic voting scam fail on the east coast, and should the other little surprises that they had in store for Democratic voters in the swing states, such as Ohio, prove insufficient. They figured they could handle a mid-size Kerry landslide--but who knows what the American people might do?; they'd given them reason to be good and pissed off. They might have to stop it by other means--and they'd been prepping for that contingency for many weeks, by planting phony "terrorist alerts" in the newstream, even one involving a California grammer school.

Come the "election." People flocking to the polls. Biggest turnout in history. Bad news for Republicans. Every evidence of a big Kerry win. Momentum on his side. Zogby says no way could Bush win--his approval rating much too low. Huge, spontaneous crowds showing up for Kerry everywhere. Thousands of get out the vote volunteers. People standing in 10 hour lines to vote.

And all day long, the news monopoly exit polls showed a decisive Kerry win of both the popular vote (by 3%) and the Electoral vote, in both state and national exit polls (that is, the polls of voters as they left the voting booth)--despite all the purges of black voters in Ohio and Florida, despite the shorting of Democratic precincts and voting machines, despite all the disappeared absentee ballots, despite the RNC-funded shredding of Democratic voter registration cards, despite every dirty trick in the book. Kerry was winning.

The news monopolies then, acting in concert, began to FALSIFY their own exit poll numbers on everybody's TV screens on election night, "ADJUSTING" the exit polls (which Kerry won, definitively) to fit the "official tally" (Bush won) that was being fed to them from Bushite-controlled central vote tabulators, run on secret, proprietary software. Thus, the American people never knew that there were two sets of numbers on election night: one of them saying Kerry won, the other saying Bush won--with the latter being a highly suspect, unverifiable number.

Same situation as they had in the Ukraine--but the Ukrainians got to see the two separate numbers, and knew that something was very wrong. Not so in Amerika, where the public was denied major evidence of election fraud, thus squelching protests and cries for investigation.

The Democrats, who had great numbers going into the election, and who, after the 2000 election debacle, had repeatedly promised that "every vote would be counted," immediately caved in, without a fight--rolled over, played dead, and were never heard from again. Except for John Conyers and Barbara Boxer, and the House Black Caucus, the Democratic leadership didn't even seem to notice the massive, blatant violations of the Voting Rights Act in Ohio--let alone the stunning indications of widespread electronic fraud in the eastern time zone.

To be fair, with faster-than-the-speed-of light electronic vote stealing on a massive scale, and all the news monopolies colluding, and the Congress full of Bush "pod people," and the Supreme Court having already disgraced itself, in 2000, bending over for the Bush Cartel, the Democrats didn't have a prayer of winning an election challenge. There is much truth to that.

But there is also truth in this: the Democratic leadership had sold out their constituents' right to vote way back in 2002-2003, when they let Bushite companies Diebold and ES&S get control of the vote tabulation, without so much as a squeak of protest.

And there is truth in this: A good half of them approve of Bush's war--voted for it, keep funding it--despite the overwhelming disapproval of their constituents, and would just as soon the Republicans take the rap for the deaths and the cost. They can hit 'em with it in '06 and '08, and just be appalled at those incompetent, thieving Bushites.

I started this post with James Moore's quote: "I have no idea how we can continue to let this happen."

We, the American people, are not "letting this happen." We have no control over the situation whatsoever. WE have been against this war from the beginning--58% of us BEFORE the invasion--and now in even bigger numbers, an utterly overwhelming majority. We opposed it. It happened anyway. We voted it down. It still goes on. And now even Republicans are turning against it. And still it goes on and on and on.

Election reform, friends! We've got to throw Diebold and ES&S and Sequoia electronic voting machines into "Boston Harbor," and start over. They have hijacked our election system, and taken away our right to vote. And we must get it back. We must!

We need...

1. Paper ballots, hand counted at the precinct level. (They do it that way in Canada, in one day!) (--and speed should not be a consideration anyway)

or, at the least...

2. Paper ballot (not "paper trail") backup of all electronic voting machines, strict auditing and security, and NO SECRET, PROPRIETARY PROGRAMMING CODE!

We must! People are dying because we have not.

And in that sense--and in that sense only--we have "permitted this to happen." We were not vigilant about protecting our right to vote. And we had better get vigilant now, before it's too late. Forget Congress doing anything (and beware of them making it worse). Get on your state and local election officials. Demand transparent, verifiable elections.

The lives of your children and grandchildren may depend upon it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -"It was so obvious that this poor woman was going to be swift-boated." understandinglife  Aug-08-05 09:27 PM   #0 
  - guess we knew it was coming sooner or later.  rodeodance   Aug-08-05 09:31 PM   #1 
  - Yes, and Ms Sheehan, as was the case with Rosa Parks and others ...  understandinglife   Aug-08-05 09:39 PM   #4 
     - Direct from the drainage ditch, the intrepid protester says ....  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 01:56 PM   #64 
     - From: Cindy - To: George -- November 4, 2005  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 03:15 PM   #69 
        - A legitimate question she raises today.  merh   Aug-09-05 05:26 PM   #74 
           - She is so very smart. They have met their downfall -- and, she warned ...  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 05:37 PM   #76 
              - She is an awesome lady.  merh   Aug-09-05 05:39 PM   #78 
  - "Tonight all of humanity thanks you Ms Sheehan."  zidzi   Aug-08-05 09:32 PM   #2 
  - This always happens to anyone who crosses this group. We've seen  readermostly   Aug-08-05 09:37 PM   #3 
  - How the hell can they smear her?? How could anyone (other  ailsagirl   Aug-08-05 09:43 PM   #5 
  - Today I felt disgusted that some DUers said they would have no empathy  Ladyhawk   Aug-09-05 12:19 AM   #22 
  - Another example how Mr. "Uniter"...............  ClintonTyree   Aug-09-05 04:15 PM   #71 
  - That is low. I feel sad for ANY mother who lost a child in that war  ailsagirl   Aug-09-05 08:57 PM   #84 
  - Especially looking at the polls lately of Bush  FreedomAngel82   Aug-09-05 12:49 AM   #29 
  - Well, the 2004 election did give birth to a new term. How long will  Pirate Smile   Aug-08-05 09:48 PM   #6 
  - Hey at least now  FreedomAngel82   Aug-09-05 12:51 AM   #31 
  - I think you've got it pretty well nailed down...  rateyes   Aug-09-05 12:49 PM   #61 
  - Here's my essay about Patriotism  evilqueen   Aug-09-05 05:37 PM   #77 
     - Excellent! Thank you. eom  rateyes   Aug-09-05 06:27 PM   #82 
  - adding to definition  bobbieinok   Aug-09-05 06:09 PM   #80 
  - instead of customarily butchering words, Bush actually created one..  President Kerry   Aug-09-05 08:48 PM   #83 
  - "A Day in the Bar Ditch of Democracy USA" and why it matters ....  understandinglife   Aug-08-05 09:54 PM   #7 
  - "I have no idea how we can continue to let this happen."-James Moore  Peace Patriot   Aug-09-05 05:54 AM   #39 
  - "Have you no sense of decency"?  btmlndfrmr   Aug-08-05 10:05 PM   #8 
  - In her grief, Cindy tried to convince herself that the loss of her son...  Fridays Child   Aug-08-05 10:52 PM   #9 
  - Cindy has the hearts and minds of the world!  ClayZ   Aug-08-05 11:40 PM   #12 
  - Yes. She has the heart of a nation behind her.  fooj   Aug-09-05 12:29 AM   #24 
  - Sludge has no shame.  ronnykmarshall   Aug-09-05 10:52 AM   #48 
  - America's 21st Century "Rosa Parks" won't budge; and the whole world is ..  understandinglife   Aug-08-05 11:19 PM   #10 
  - what will King George do  il_lilac   Aug-08-05 11:37 PM   #11 
  - Probably keep digging an even deeper hole ... one that leads to ....  understandinglife   Aug-08-05 11:41 PM   #14 
     - Ahh  il_lilac   Aug-09-05 12:01 AM   #20 
  - It's so amazing to me  FreedomAngel82   Aug-09-05 01:18 AM   #34 
     - It has always been ... the power of one person who rivets an issue ....  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 10:23 AM   #41 
  - "We the people" this time can stop it. Period.  anarchy1999   Aug-08-05 11:41 PM   #13 
  - "Sorry, just feeling a little passionate." Never, I repeat, NEVER ...  understandinglife   Aug-08-05 11:46 PM   #16 
  - "We the people"  sandnsea   Aug-09-05 12:33 PM   #59 
  - Cindy's response to this from her DKos diary up just a little while ago:  Hissyspit   Aug-08-05 11:45 PM   #15 
  - Thank you and if you think it helpful to her, please ...  understandinglife   Aug-08-05 11:48 PM   #17 
  - Doing that now, understandinglife. n/t  Hissyspit   Aug-08-05 11:54 PM   # 
  - I imagine this may be the paragraph they will use to  Dr_eldritch   Aug-09-05 01:46 PM   #63 
  - Let them go. Let them spin it any way they want.  Ragazz68   Aug-08-05 11:54 PM   #18 
  - Nope, not going to ignore this one  tavalon   Aug-09-05 03:58 AM   #36 
  - One person refusing to cave CAN make a difference. I think the smears  Nothing Without Hope   Aug-08-05 11:56 PM   #19 
  - NY Times Editorial for August 9, 2005: "One Woman in Crawford"  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 12:10 AM   #21 
  - Thank you for posting this. Very well felt and written. God bless you.  BigBearJohn   Aug-09-05 12:38 AM   #26 
  - Truth is our most powerful weapon! Kick for Cindy! Kick for truth!  fooj   Aug-09-05 12:26 AM   #23 
  - Steve Cobble: It's a war based on lies, and Cindy Sheehan wants the truth  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 12:31 AM   #25 
  - N Solomon: "The war-makers rely on "perception management" techniques ..."  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 12:45 AM   #27 
  - It's really very telling  FreedomAngel82   Aug-09-05 12:48 AM   #28 
  - It's as though Mary, having already given her son, is chased from Herod's  bleever   Aug-09-05 12:51 AM   #30 
  - I DESPISE THESE BASTARDS!  flyarm   Aug-09-05 12:56 AM   #32 
  - Mr President, there's someone waiting, and waiting, to see you  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 01:16 AM   #33 
  - Isn't Rosa still living?  AmBlue   Aug-09-05 05:02 PM   #72 
     - Yes, she is still alive. She is in her 90's and I do not know the ...  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 05:11 PM   #73 
     - She worked for Congressman Conyers for several years and ...  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 05:28 PM   #75 
        - Email and Fax to Congressman Conyers (and a request to DUers)  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 05:57 PM   #79 
  - If they try, they're going to need a really big boat this time.  sfexpat2000   Aug-09-05 01:59 AM   #35 
  - Cindy To Asshat "Bring It on"  Binka   Aug-09-05 04:10 AM   #37 
  - Here is the original  bluedonkey   Aug-09-05 05:51 AM   #38 
  - All best wishes to Cindy Sheehan!  LeftishBrit   Aug-09-05 10:17 AM   #40 
  - A pathetic attempt at a smear  MathGuy   Aug-09-05 10:27 AM   #42 
  - "This woman has no credibility" quoth are local Rush clone in Fargo  markus   Aug-09-05 10:32 AM   #43 
  - Let them smear her - it is incredibly stupid move on their part!  debbierlus   Aug-09-05 10:32 AM   #44 
  - Welcome to DU, debbierlus!  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 10:57 AM   #49 
  - All the money, all the powerful political icons & celebrities, the media  JRob   Aug-09-05 10:32 AM   #45 
  - Is Drudge incapable of reading at a middle school level?  progressivebydesign   Aug-09-05 10:40 AM   #46 
  - and Donald Rumsfeld once gave Saddam a friendly handshake...  MathGuy   Aug-09-05 10:42 AM   #47 
  - "Cindy, Crawford, and the Bush Smear Machine"  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 11:00 AM   #50 
  - So the smears have started  nadinbrzezinski   Aug-09-05 11:06 AM   #51 
  - Anyone read this? What Bush ACTUALLY said to her?  Carolab   Aug-09-05 11:12 AM   #52 
  - I say have the two daughters join NOW  nadinbrzezinski   Aug-09-05 11:40 AM   #54 
  - RW never grieve  riverwalker   Aug-09-05 11:29 AM   #53 
  - Raw Story interview with Cindy Sheehan and new web site posted:  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 11:58 AM   #55 
  - Cindy Sheehan has "soured" on Bush  joytomme   Aug-09-05 11:59 AM   #56 
  - Interesting Hypocrisy...  volitionx   Aug-09-05 12:09 PM   #57 
  - momentum  buddha8   Aug-09-05 12:13 PM   #58 
  - What am I missing? Drudge reported as she was quoted??  ecoalex   Aug-09-05 12:43 PM   #60 
  - Is the President being unconstitutional?  savemefromdumbya   Aug-09-05 01:32 PM   #62 
  - Courage and Wisdom to Change....  puebloknot   Aug-09-05 02:26 PM   #65 
  - 16 Democrats call on Bush to meet mother of fallen soldier  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 02:31 PM   #66 
  - Congressman Conyers: "Support Cindy"  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 02:57 PM   #68 
  - A great start...  fighttheevilempire   Aug-09-05 03:23 PM   #70 
  - Kick!  Independent_Liberal   Aug-09-05 02:54 PM   #67 
  - Kick for Cindy  BamaBecky   Aug-09-05 06:26 PM   #81 
  - FYI: The smear started at FreeRepublic - looks like a WH plant...  Junkdrawer   Aug-09-05 09:12 PM   #85 
  - Maureen Dowd: "W. can't get no satisfaction on Iraq."  understandinglife   Aug-09-05 10:45 PM   #86 
     - There was no smear, Cindy may have had a change of heart, she did change  ecoalex   Aug-10-05 01:10 PM   #87 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC