You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #82: Ok, last one for the night. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #74
82. Ok, last one for the night.
Why do recounts take longer than the initial count, I don't really have to tell you do I? And didn't a machine create those hanging chads in Florida? And wasn't the confusing ballot resulting in Buchanan getting Al Gores votes displayed on a machine?

Who pays for the security of the central tabulator? I don't mind a central tabulator, but I want no modems hooked to it, just a numerical keyboard will do. The phone line can be hooked to the phone next to the tabulator.

Ballots are not just a printed page with names, they are now pages and pages of names and initiatives. Most elections would only be about five or six pages, off years would probably be less. Ok, I start with piles of ballots, and end with piles of ballots. You start with a machine and blank paper,and end up with piles of ballots. We both need booths, mine have a table, your have a machine. I can afford many booths and tables, you can afford a few booths and machines. I eliminated the problem of voters having to wait too long. We both need the same amount of space for paper, unless your printout doesn't look like your screen, but that wouldn't be a good idea.

I live in the largest county in my state, it is also, the last I knew, the largest county east of the Mississippi river. Alas it is also one of the least populous in the state. They might not agree with you. We can't afford expensive machines, or the maintenance and security that goes with them. Most of our local elections are in the off years, our ballots are rarely very long or complicated. We presently use lever machines, have for as long as I can remember(early 70s).

By the way, I,m not anti-technology. I worked in IT for 5 years. Never met a computer or server that couldn't be screwed up, and usually by a well meaning user.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Why don't "we" build an 'open source' voting machine company?? Rosco T.  Aug-03-05 05:15 PM   #0 
  - Because paper ballots hand counted would be cheaper and more secure  libertypirate   Aug-03-05 05:15 PM   #1 
  - No arguement.. but people have 'machines in their mind'...  Rosco T.   Aug-03-05 05:17 PM   #2 
  - In the 2004 presidential primary, I voted on a plain piece of paper.  Eric J in MN   Aug-03-05 05:20 PM   #8 
  - You just don't get it...  Rosco T.   Aug-03-05 05:22 PM   #12 
     - OK, if people need automation, then how about  Eric J in MN   Aug-03-05 05:27 PM   #20 
     - what I propose would have that as an OPTION..  Rosco T.   Aug-03-05 05:30 PM   #23 
        - What is the point of electronic voting machines  Eric J in MN   Aug-03-05 05:36 PM   #28 
           - If you have a MACHINE print the ballot...  Rosco T.   Aug-03-05 05:46 PM   #33 
              - People can make a lot more mistakes with electronic voting  Eric J in MN   Aug-03-05 06:01 PM   #39 
                 - "Open" source would be a big step forward, but still has invisibility  Land Shark   Aug-04-05 07:28 PM   #104 
                    - Voting machines that aren't connected to the internet cannot get viruses.  Massacure   Aug-05-05 07:56 AM   #109 
     - Exactly!  merh   Aug-03-05 09:53 PM   #66 
  - Still depends on who is counting.  Tigress DEM   Aug-03-05 10:59 PM   #75 
  - Disagree  dhinojosa   Aug-03-05 05:19 PM   #5 
  - Wind? not if countd AT precincts. ballots never move  oscar111   Aug-03-05 05:29 PM   #22 
  - A couple of cans of gas, and a gun, and there goes those ballots.  dhinojosa   Aug-03-05 05:33 PM   #25 
  - ? a gun, and all databases go out the window  oscar111   Aug-03-05 05:37 PM   #29 
     - If after each vote it gets automatically wired out of the precinct?  dhinojosa   Aug-03-05 05:39 PM   #30 
        - elec. wire-out each vote:tricks abound there  oscar111   Aug-03-05 05:43 PM   #32 
  - How do you prevent ballot stuffing?  merh   Aug-03-05 09:54 PM   #67 
     - Each precinct watcher can have a stamp.  Festivito   Aug-04-05 05:46 AM   #94 
        - "a tedious review could begin"  merh   Aug-04-05 09:49 AM   #96 
           - Volunteers and paid volunteers.  Festivito   Aug-05-05 06:17 AM   #105 
              - Who funds the paid volunteers?  merh   Aug-05-05 09:14 AM   #110 
                 - I understand the concern when there is pay.  Festivito   Aug-05-05 04:48 PM   #112 
                    - Since you have been involved in overseeing elections, how easy  merh   Aug-05-05 04:58 PM   #113 
                       - My friend oversaw.  Festivito   Aug-05-05 07:23 PM   #117 
                          - And it was the "contenders" watchers that caused such a problem  merh   Aug-05-05 07:51 PM   #118 
                             - Not so much the watchers. Republican judges were the problem.  Festivito   Aug-05-05 11:38 PM   #119 
  - I am a software engineer who started out as an  libertypirate   Aug-03-05 06:56 PM   #41 
  - Do the freaken math.  yowzayowzayowza   Aug-03-05 07:32 PM   #42 
  - What is dangerous is the folks who haven't a clue what it takes  merh   Aug-03-05 08:59 PM   #53 
     - Exactly...  libertypirate   Aug-03-05 10:37 PM   #73 
        - Well, let's put it this way.  merh   Aug-03-05 11:25 PM   #79 
           - So how do we weed through who is going to do it right  libertypirate   Aug-04-05 06:31 PM   #102 
              - You don't necessarily.  yowzayowzayowza   Aug-05-05 07:56 AM   #108 
  - Now see, that is where you guys miss the practicalities of  merh   Aug-03-05 08:50 PM   #49 
  - What's the hurry?  A Simple Game   Aug-03-05 09:06 PM   #54 
     - How are you going to fund the recount?  merh   Aug-03-05 09:08 PM   #55 
        - There doesn't seem to be a problem  A Simple Game   Aug-03-05 09:29 PM   #60 
           - Canada's population compared to ours?  merh   Aug-03-05 09:47 PM   #65 
              - So California uses the same number of counters that  A Simple Game   Aug-03-05 10:03 PM   #70 
                 - Go back and what the footage from the Florida recounts.  merh   Aug-03-05 10:12 PM   #71 
                    - My saying give me a week was hyperbole.  A Simple Game   Aug-03-05 10:28 PM   #72 
                       - You must be living in another realm of reality.  merh   Aug-03-05 10:54 PM   #74 
                          - Ok, last one for the night.  A Simple Game   Aug-03-05 11:45 PM   #82 
                             - Excuse me - hand counts take longer than recounts.  merh   Aug-03-05 11:53 PM   #83 
                                - Take 10 deep breaths.  A Simple Game   Aug-04-05 12:22 AM   #84 
                                   - Again, your ignorance of election laws is showing.  merh   Aug-04-05 12:31 AM   #85 
                                      - Actually, In Washington state, a recount is a full recount of all ballots.  claudiajean   Aug-04-05 03:18 AM   #90 
                                         - Like you said, you live in a county with a small population.  merh   Aug-04-05 09:46 AM   #95 
  - Hand counts are not accurate. If you gave one person 1,000 ballots  Egalitariat   Aug-04-05 06:47 PM   #103 
  - I thought a bunch of geeks were already on it.  aquart   Aug-03-05 05:18 PM   #3 
  - Maybe we should hit Soros for a grant :)  Rosco T.   Aug-03-05 05:19 PM   #6 
  - I think we should get all the grants we could. Maybe we could be ..  Tiggeroshii   Aug-03-05 05:22 PM   #13 
  - Still, PAPER BALLOTS HAND COUNTED  oscar111   Aug-03-05 05:21 PM   #10 
     - If the CODE is open, and the voter has to approve the printed ballot...  Rosco T.   Aug-03-05 05:23 PM   #15 
     - Genius exists to surprise you with new tricks  oscar111   Aug-03-05 05:40 PM   #31 
     - it's a shell game  foo_bar   Aug-03-05 09:16 PM   #58 
     - The voter has to approve the printed ballot.  Pobeka   Aug-03-05 05:56 PM   #38 
     - I agree. With publicly-witnessed counting.  aquart   Aug-03-05 09:42 PM   #64 
        - That's how it's done in Spain.  July   Aug-05-05 07:43 AM   #107 
  - That's a great idea  carnie_sf   Aug-03-05 05:18 PM   #4 
  - You like java too eh...  dhinojosa   Aug-03-05 05:19 PM   #7 
  - Java & SQL.... no 'binary' code to hide in...  Rosco T.   Aug-03-05 05:20 PM   #9 
     - You are soooo correct....  dhinojosa   Aug-03-05 05:34 PM   #27 
        - that's what the third copy (machine audit) is for..  Rosco T.   Aug-03-05 05:47 PM   #34 
  - I think a nomination of this post is good. kickin'  Tiggeroshii   Aug-03-05 05:21 PM   #11 
  - It's the exisitng companies who have the contracts and lobbyists.  Eric J in MN   Aug-03-05 05:23 PM   #14 
  - Not gonna happen if they won't sell (and you think they would), a new..  Rosco T.   Aug-03-05 05:25 PM   #18 
     - Sequioa was for sale several months ago, and  Eric J in MN   Aug-03-05 05:31 PM   #24 
  - There's a project in the works.  skids   Aug-03-05 05:24 PM   #16 
  - I would provide my services as well  jsamuel   Aug-03-05 05:24 PM   #17 
  - Maybe it would be safer if, instead of printing, it would output  ArkDem   Aug-03-05 05:27 PM   #19 
  - Geeze.. why didn't someone tell me I misspelled source in the 1st message  Rosco T.   Aug-03-05 05:28 PM   #21 
  - Rosco, idea is good #2 choice if we cant get PAPR..CNTED PBHC  oscar111   Aug-03-05 05:34 PM   #26 
  - Logjam's can be broken with $$$  Rosco T.   Aug-03-05 05:48 PM   #35 
  - #1 Choice to GENERATE THE PAPER BALLOTS...  Rosco T.   Aug-03-05 05:50 PM   #37 
     - It's even better: Printer and Scanner MUST match... Automatic recount!  WhoWantsToBeOccupied   Aug-03-05 11:14 PM   #77 
  - Release early and often...  alcibiades_mystery   Aug-03-05 08:25 PM   #47 
  - There are Some open Source voting Projects in the works  mackdaddy   Aug-03-05 05:48 PM   #36 
  - Both of these companies are doing good work.  phiddle   Aug-03-05 09:32 PM   #61 
  - Drive hardware cost to $0 with KNOPPIX-style bootable CD  WhoWantsToBeOccupied   Aug-03-05 11:38 PM   #81 
  - Another possibility, using automated counting equipment.  Pobeka   Aug-03-05 06:02 PM   #40 
  - Already done in Australia  interupt   Aug-03-05 07:41 PM   #43 
  - I'm told by an Australian correspondent of mine that paper ballots--  eridani   Aug-03-05 08:15 PM   #45 
  - True  interupt   Aug-03-05 08:32 PM   #48 
  - Not in America  kster   Aug-04-05 01:57 AM   #87 
  - Give them companies one option  kster   Aug-03-05 08:15 PM   #44 
  - I like the idea.  impeachdubya   Aug-03-05 08:20 PM   #46 
  - there already is one:  garybeck   Aug-03-05 08:53 PM   #50 
  - Roscoe T, I like your thinking! Let's sell it to the country,  babylonsister   Aug-03-05 08:54 PM   #51 
  - absolutely  foo_bar   Aug-03-05 08:57 PM   #52 
  - YES! (Beats my donut eating contest idea I had)  O.M.B.inOhio   Aug-03-05 09:09 PM   #56 
  - The automated teller machine at my bank is made by Liebold...and I bet  grannylib   Aug-03-05 09:16 PM   #57 
  - another open source idea - voter registration analysis software  boddhi   Aug-03-05 09:21 PM   #59 
  - Good work, Roscoe! Nominated  Husb2Sparkly   Aug-03-05 09:33 PM   #62 
  - can it be battery operated????  MissWaverly   Aug-03-05 09:39 PM   #63 
  - Just stick them on a 60 minute UPS and 'power blackouts' no loger matter.  Rosco T.   Aug-03-05 11:25 PM   #78 
     - It has to be inside the machine  MissWaverly   Aug-04-05 05:08 PM   #101 
  - You need a buttload of money to  kenny blankenship   Aug-03-05 09:56 PM   #68 
  - you just have to underbid the competition (by a lot)  foo_bar   Aug-03-05 11:09 PM   #76 
     - if we had to, make it a $100 machine, lose money.. save democracy. n/m  Rosco T.   Aug-03-05 11:27 PM   #80 
  - Why not pursue something like the TRUVOTE SYSTEM OF ATHAN GIBBS?  Nothing Without Hope   Aug-03-05 10:03 PM   #69 
  - I don't like the under plexiglass idea.  Festivito   Aug-04-05 05:34 AM   #93 
  - How do you prove that the published source code is what actually runs on  satya   Aug-04-05 01:32 AM   #86 
  - Simply put.. MD5  Rosco T.   Aug-04-05 02:25 AM   #88 
     - Thanks for the explanation;brings back memories of writing code to compute  satya   Aug-04-05 03:05 AM   #89 
        - Real simple way to sum the machines... you don't...  Rosco T.   Aug-04-05 03:20 AM   #91 
  - Why is there no simple paper backup when machines fail, or  Festivito   Aug-04-05 05:22 AM   #92 
  - David Chaum's solution - "Votegrity" a possible solution.....  indigonation   Aug-04-05 12:31 PM   #97 
  - We also need to have our own cnn or better yet - take over an existing one  kerry-is-my-prez   Aug-04-05 01:54 PM   #98 
  - Sorry, Roscoe. We don't discuss solutions here at the DU  rucky   Aug-04-05 02:32 PM   #99 
  - we have  helderheid   Aug-04-05 02:36 PM   #100 
  - You managed to build a system, including monitor, for $300?  Mairead   Aug-05-05 06:55 AM   #106 
  - Not counting monitor... but I did just buy a Samsung 977 for $99. n/m  Rosco T.   Aug-05-05 05:05 PM   #114 
  - Some good ideas  wtmusic   Aug-05-05 09:43 AM   #111 
  - Bankrolls and MD5's...  Rosco T.   Aug-05-05 05:09 PM   #115 
  - Havent read all the posts..  Lannes   Aug-05-05 05:13 PM   #116 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC