You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #36: I also read the article and it does NOT get any better. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
neweurope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #27
36. I also read the article and it does NOT get any better.
Read again: "Since employers are not obligated to inform employees of their legally-protected right to associate with their co-workers, how can we expect any employee to assume that a rule banning fraternization doesn't interfere with these rights? And why would someone risk violating a no-fraternization rule, given that most employees work 'at will'meaning they can be fired for no reason?"

Even if you were right - and you aren't - this should be fought! If nobody protests this then what will be the NEXT thing they come up with??


Remember Fallujah

Bush to The Hague!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Employers can ban off-duty workers from all fraternization Rose Siding  Jul-30-05 12:41 PM   #0 
  - The more Bush acts like God the more his Minions folow suit...  sam sarrha   Jul-30-05 12:44 PM   #1 
  - Best way to kill this kind of thing....  Liberal Veteran   Jul-30-05 12:44 PM   #2 
  - I like the way you think!!!!! n/t  converted_democrat   Jul-30-05 01:38 PM   #9 
  - I like it, too!!  Gay Green   Jul-30-05 02:16 PM   # 
  - We use to have Union meetings in the basement of a church...  B Calm   Jul-31-05 06:54 AM   #32 
  - What an excellent idea!  theHandpuppet   Jul-31-05 07:48 AM   #39 
  - What?? I can't believe this!  smirkymonkey   Jul-30-05 01:21 PM   #3 
  - Very alarming. Means an employer gets to screen the pals you choose  havocmom   Jul-30-05 01:32 PM   #6 
  - Paving the way for the revolution....  smirkymonkey   Jul-30-05 01:37 PM   #8 
     - Let's just say powder is dry  havocmom   Jul-30-05 02:29 PM   #18 
  - If the corporations own the media outlets  AuntieM1957   Jul-30-05 08:23 PM   #24 
  - How can something like this possibly be enforced?  No Surrender   Jul-30-05 01:27 PM   #4 
  - I hope the ACLU is all over this crap  annabanana   Jul-30-05 01:32 PM   #5 
  - More and more legislating litigation; soon there won't be courts for ACLU  havocmom   Jul-30-05 01:35 PM   #7 
  - there already aren't, that's what the Federalist Society is for  wli   Jul-30-05 02:58 PM   #20 
  - yeah, how does this work in a company town?  fortyfeetunder   Jul-30-05 03:06 PM   #22 
  - Things like this are why groups like the ACLU  Pushed To The Left   Jul-31-05 06:58 AM   #33 
  - I'm extremely lucky  Simply Fugue   Jul-30-05 01:43 PM   #10 
  - Me too - what would we do without our occasional happy hours together?  meganmonkey   Jul-30-05 02:32 PM   #19 
  - The Corporations wants us to be like Prison Inmates  dogday   Jul-30-05 01:45 PM   #11 
  - return of the 'company store' nt  Viva_La_Revolution   Jul-30-05 01:57 PM   #14 
  - the shackles and stun belts will come out soon enough  wli   Jul-30-05 03:04 PM   #21 
  - Many businesses forbid dating, even the Military forbids  napi21   Jul-30-05 01:46 PM   #12 
  - Guardsmark doesn't pay enough to demand jack shit from ...  Pepperbelly   Jul-31-05 08:11 AM   #40 
  - This is unconstitutional.  screembloodymurder   Jul-30-05 01:49 PM   #13 
  - Does this mean I can't carpool?  Nobody   Jul-30-05 02:01 PM   #15 
  - Carpooling would hurt oil company profits.  troubleinwinter   Jul-30-05 04:48 PM   #23 
  - Silly Americans  Mich Otter   Jul-30-05 02:16 PM   #16 
  - It's great to live in a free country.  brokensymmetry   Jul-30-05 02:18 PM   #17 
  - How would that work in a small town  gollygee   Jul-30-05 08:39 PM   #25 
  - Wtf?  DanCa   Jul-30-05 08:42 PM   #26 
  - I am glad I read the whole article  dsc   Jul-30-05 08:49 PM   #27 
  - Do you have a link to where you read the whole thing? Thanks.n/t  niallmac   Jul-31-05 12:04 AM   #28 
  - In the OP  dsc   Jul-31-05 06:39 AM   #31 
  - I also read the article and it does NOT get any better.  neweurope   Jul-31-05 07:37 AM   #36 
     - self delete  neweurope   Jul-31-05 07:42 AM   #37 
     - what is to stop us from informing them of their rights?  dsc   Aug-01-05 09:30 AM   #44 
  - puts a crimp in unionization, eh?  leftofthedial   Jul-31-05 12:08 AM   #29 
  - This is All Still Only the Beginning...  Hidden Stillness   Jul-31-05 12:47 AM   #30 
  - This should be a campaign issue  Pushed To The Left   Jul-31-05 07:02 AM   #34 
  - Thats why I'm against drug tests at work! Employers have a right  B Calm   Jul-31-05 07:07 AM   #35 
  - Several DUers argue logically here - for instance  neweurope   Jul-31-05 07:43 AM   #38 
  - Been there...  BedRock   Jul-31-05 08:11 AM   #41 
  - I'm more fortunate than many it appears  sonoradesertdem   Jul-31-05 08:17 AM   #42 
  - The National Labor Relations Board under Bush is very pro-employer  wishlist   Jul-31-05 09:10 AM   #43 
  - Micro managing control freaks in these corporations are out of control!  AgadorSparticus   Aug-01-05 09:42 AM   #45 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC