You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: No need to resort to patronizing behavior bec. I don't agree with you [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. No need to resort to patronizing behavior bec. I don't agree with you
I have seen your comments on threads earlier this week, I disagree, end of story. Plus it's past 1 AM and I'm off to bed. Good night! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -A Stunning Concession on Roberts From the Radical Bloggers at Powerline nashuaadvocate  Jul-23-05 11:56 PM   #0 
  - I don't know what's going on  Frances   Jul-23-05 11:58 PM   #1 
  - I say, get it over with, give him the robe and then let's Chimpeach.  iconoclastic cat   Jul-23-05 11:59 PM   #2 
  - What're the Dems doing?  jurassicpork   Jul-24-05 12:07 AM   #10 
  - Chimpeach!  RevolutionStartsNow   Jul-24-05 12:50 AM   #26 
  - His wife is one of the leaders of Feminists for Life, a radical  Kathy in Cambridge   Jul-24-05 12:01 AM   #3 
  - That is interesting.  iconoclastic cat   Jul-24-05 12:02 AM   #4 
  - And it's also relevant.  Kathy in Cambridge   Jul-24-05 12:04 AM   #6 
  - And Bush's wife is pro-choice.  merwin   Jul-24-05 12:04 AM   #5 
  - Your point is well-taken, but  stanwyck   Jul-24-05 09:45 PM   #50 
  - Yes his wife is clearly anti-choice, but that doesn't mean he is. All of  woodleydem   Jul-24-05 12:04 AM   #7 
  - I guess I can only say this...  nashuaadvocate   Jul-24-05 12:07 AM   #11 
  - O'Connor was conservative on most things.  JDPriestly   Jul-24-05 01:47 AM   #31 
  - I think the Roberts nomination was a sign that bush  alfredo   Jul-24-05 10:28 PM   #53 
  - I agree.  Taylor Mason Powell   Jul-24-05 10:49 PM   #56 
     - Someone explain to me.................  springhill   Jul-24-05 11:01 PM   #58 
        - Well...  Taylor Mason Powell   Jul-24-05 11:15 PM   #59 
           - --Jonathan Turley, on John "women are stupid" Roberts  springhill   Jul-25-05 01:12 AM   #64 
              - I don't doubt it.  Taylor Mason Powell   Jul-25-05 02:17 AM   #66 
  - The trouble is that he is NOT the worst we could of gotten...  Gronk Groks   Jul-24-05 12:10 AM   #14 
  - I've been wondering if her involvement in the "pro-life" movement  lawladyprof   Jul-24-05 12:41 PM   #46 
  - "Ann Coulter says Roberts is not a true-blue conservative"  bloom   Jul-24-05 12:04 AM   #8 
  - Actually...  nashuaadvocate   Jul-24-05 12:09 AM   #13 
     - I think she's a tool.  bloom   Jul-24-05 12:12 AM   #18 
        - agreed - Coulter, Malkin, FR, etc help the RW move debate further right  NewJeffCT   Jul-24-05 09:16 AM   #36 
  - It's all part of a carefully orchestrated campaign  kevsand   Jul-24-05 12:04 AM   #9 
  - I agree. This is precisely the sort of nasty stealth politics...  newswolf56   Jul-24-05 12:08 AM   #12 
  - That a pretty big conspiracy...  nashuaadvocate   Jul-24-05 12:11 AM   #15 
  - I didn't say conspiracy,  kevsand   Jul-24-05 12:20 AM   #21 
  - They all fear another Souter  Solo_in_MD   Jul-24-05 09:00 AM   #35 
  - Exactly. The naïveté on this thread is truly astounding.  Kathy in Cambridge   Jul-24-05 12:12 AM   #17 
  - Yep. You have me pegged.  nashuaadvocate   Jul-24-05 12:14 AM   #19 
     - No need to resort to patronizing behavior bec. I don't agree with you  Kathy in Cambridge   Jul-24-05 12:22 AM   #22 
        - Fair enough--  nashuaadvocate   Jul-24-05 12:38 AM   #23 
  - Any indications he is a stealth dominionist???  kestrel91316   Jul-24-05 01:30 AM   #30 
  - I think maybe what they are saying  Nite Owl   Jul-24-05 12:12 AM   #16 
  - Well, I know next to nothing but I feel like you are right.  niallmac   Jul-24-05 12:14 AM   #20 
  - The Religious Reich is NOT Screaming...that is all you need to know  NAO   Jul-24-05 12:42 AM   #24 
  - Bingo  Generator   Jul-24-05 12:23 PM   #44 
  - A HA! Now THAT'S a good point.  crispini   Jul-24-05 12:32 PM   #45 
  - Maybe his purpose on the court is not to overturn Roe v. Wade but to  bunny planet   Jul-24-05 12:48 AM   #25 
  - Folks think they're just having a stunning sip of ice water  A-Schwarzenegger   Jul-24-05 12:59 AM   #27 
  - What's going on here is a media blitz to...  punpirate   Jul-24-05 01:04 AM   #28 
  - Oh please............  springhill   Jul-24-05 01:18 AM   #29 
  - No, he hasn't. Ever. Said that.  nashuaadvocate   Jul-24-05 08:53 AM   #32 
     - That's not just in the NARAL newsletter, but all over the internet  Kathy in Cambridge   Jul-24-05 08:55 AM   #33 
     - Kathy, you read the other thread...  nashuaadvocate   Jul-24-05 10:02 AM   #38 
     - Oh yes, knower of all.........  springhill   Jul-24-05 12:06 PM   #41 
        - (Sigh).  nashuaadvocate   Jul-24-05 08:50 PM   #47 
           - Boy, evidence doesn't seem too compelling to you.....  springhill   Jul-24-05 09:05 PM   #48 
           - I didn't say he would be a "swing vote"...  nashuaadvocate   Jul-24-05 09:20 PM   #49 
              - Okay........  springhill   Jul-24-05 10:23 PM   #52 
                 - Hedgepath and Rancho Viejo are two.  nashuaadvocate   Jul-24-05 10:29 PM   #54 
                    - Can you at least give me some background on these?  springhill   Jul-24-05 10:48 PM   #55 
                       - You can find them easily online:  nashuaadvocate   Jul-24-05 10:57 PM   #57 
                          - Post #56........  springhill   Jul-24-05 11:21 PM   #60 
           - wasn't that your thread too?  noiretblu   Jul-24-05 11:53 PM   #61 
  - could it be the B'rer Rabbit defense?? ->  msongs   Jul-24-05 08:59 AM   #34 
  - Do you wish to die by slow acting poison or shot in the head  Toots   Jul-24-05 09:17 AM   #37 
  - Give me a viable third option...  nashuaadvocate   Jul-24-05 10:03 AM   #39 
  - ya know...  Lexingtonian   Jul-24-05 10:26 AM   #40 
  - Is he or is he not a member of Federalist Society?  Pepperbelly   Jul-24-05 12:08 PM   #42 
  - Listed in '97-98 Directory  Panda1   Jul-24-05 09:53 PM   #51 
  - I think you are deluding yourself/trying to convince yourself?  Generator   Jul-24-05 12:19 PM   #43 
  - he's a BFEE company man  noiretblu   Jul-24-05 11:55 PM   #62 
  - Won't matter in the end. The repubes have the votes  SoCalDem   Jul-24-05 11:57 PM   #63 
  - The night of Roberts' nomination,  deadparrot   Jul-25-05 01:16 AM   #65 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC