gully
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 01:22 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-27-03 01:23 PM by gully
woops!
|
| -a different take on factionalism for Democrats |
Iverson |
Sep-27-03 12:06 PM |
#0 |
 -
I stay in the party because it is closest to my liberal views |
Classical_Liberal |
Sep-27-03 12:12 PM |
#1 |
| -
I grew up in a Republican household always believing Democrats... |
Terwilliger |
Sep-27-03 12:12 PM |
#2 |
  -
didn't you leave in 2000? |
gully |
Sep-27-03 12:21 PM |
#6 |
| -
no, but I will be now |
Terwilliger |
Sep-27-03 12:22 PM |
#8 |
| -
let's keep it constructive |
Iverson |
Sep-27-03 12:23 PM |
#9 |
| -
Theoretically I’m pretty conservative… |
LeviathanCrumbling |
Sep-27-03 12:13 PM |
#3 |
| -
I tend to agree with you |
Armstead |
Sep-28-03 04:44 PM |
#85 |
| -
I'm barely in the party anymore. I'm tired of the constant scare tactics |
JVS |
Sep-27-03 12:14 PM |
#4 |
| -
understood, but my question is different |
Iverson |
Sep-27-03 12:20 PM |
#5 |
| -
I'm not sure this is where I should be working |
JVS |
Sep-27-03 12:23 PM |
#10 |
| -
I agree entirely. I'm also annoyed that your thread was locked. It's like |
RichM |
Sep-27-03 12:22 PM |
#7 |
| -
in a specific way ... |
Iverson |
Sep-27-03 12:24 PM |
#11 |
| -
specifically reasoning why we were here in the first place? |
Terwilliger |
Sep-27-03 12:26 PM |
#13 |
| -
that's one of many possibilities |
Iverson |
Sep-27-03 12:27 PM |
#15 |
| -
my candid response was in my first post |
Terwilliger |
Sep-27-03 12:35 PM |
#18 |
| -
It is as though a Berlin wall has decended around our "big tent" |
JVS |
Sep-27-03 12:24 PM |
#12 |
| -
Iverson, you are very kind to try to get us to express our thoughts in a.. |
JVS |
Sep-27-03 12:27 PM |
#14 |
| -
JVS, we live in an age that has abandoned reason. |
Iverson |
Sep-27-03 12:32 PM |
#17 |
| -
I stay in the Democratic party because there is no other option |
WhoCountsTheVotes |
Sep-27-03 12:30 PM |
#16 |
| -
Where's the line? |
dralston |
Sep-27-03 01:00 PM |
#19 |
| -
Life is always better |
10digits |
Sep-27-03 01:09 PM |
#20 |
| -
A sidenote |
jiacinto |
Sep-27-03 01:11 PM |
#21 |
| -
If we are leaving the party, what makes you think we care? |
JVS |
Sep-27-03 01:48 PM |
#28 |
| -
What can I do |
jiacinto |
Sep-27-03 02:05 PM |
#33 |
| -
HA! I wish you could see this, Carlos. But here goes: You say "So what |
RichM |
Sep-27-03 02:15 PM |
#37 |
| -
have you seen Armstead's thread? |
noiretblu |
Sep-28-03 05:25 PM |
#86 |
| -
Dupe* |
gully |
Sep-27-03 01:22 PM |
# |
| -
I stay with in the party because....when a Democrat has been president ... |
gully |
Sep-27-03 01:22 PM |
#22 |
| -
I'm no longer in the Party -- I'm *here* because I'm hoping the Party |
Mairead |
Sep-27-03 01:23 PM |
#23 |
| -
Nice knowing you! |
dralston |
Sep-27-03 01:31 PM |
#24 |
| -
Yeah he shapes discussion like running over a cat alters a crosstown trip |
JVS |
Sep-27-03 01:40 PM |
#25 |
| -
"Can't you be satisfied that Dennis helps shape the discussion?" |
Mairead |
Sep-27-03 01:41 PM |
#27 |
| -
Sad fact |
dralston |
Sep-27-03 02:02 PM |
#30 |
| -
I'll answer that for them |
jiacinto |
Sep-27-03 02:15 PM |
#36 |
| -
you know ... |
Iverson |
Sep-27-03 02:19 PM |
#38 |
| -
this poster is a prime example of why I'm not hanging around |
Terwilliger |
Sep-27-03 02:20 PM |
#39 |
| -
hold on |
Iverson |
Sep-27-03 02:24 PM |
#42 |
| -
I have Iverson |
Terwilliger |
Sep-27-03 03:43 PM |
#65 |
| -
Yeah, they'll sacrifice our votes but piss and moan forever |
JVS |
Sep-27-03 02:25 PM |
#43 |
| -
she's supporting a democrat: kucinich |
noiretblu |
Sep-28-03 03:40 PM |
#82 |
| -
"what will you do when your other party candidate fails to win?" |
Mairead |
Sep-27-03 03:01 PM |
#52 |
| -
What I will do if Kucinich doesn't win |
JellyBean1 |
Sep-27-03 04:25 PM |
#71 |
| -
See you on the other side comrade. |
JVS |
Sep-27-03 01:41 PM |
#26 |
| -
You call it 'factionalism'...but I call it an orchestrated effort... |
Q |
Sep-27-03 01:59 PM |
#29 |
| -
good to see you posting Q |
JVS |
Sep-27-03 02:03 PM |
#32 |
| -
So far so good... |
Q |
Sep-27-03 02:13 PM |
#35 |
| -
thank you |
Iverson |
Sep-27-03 02:22 PM |
#40 |
| -
I think, if it comes to that, that we'll have plenty company |
Mairead |
Sep-27-03 03:03 PM |
#53 |
| -
Do you honestly think America would elect DK president? |
jiacinto |
Sep-27-03 02:08 PM |
#34 |
| -
Yeah. |
JVS |
Sep-27-03 02:22 PM |
#41 |
| -
Only at DU would people say I am conservative |
jiacinto |
Sep-27-03 02:26 PM |
#44 |
| -
You are conservative on the spectrum of Democrats |
JVS |
Sep-27-03 02:28 PM |
#45 |
| -
I disagree |
jiacinto |
Sep-27-03 02:31 PM |
#48 |
| -
excuse me ... |
Iverson |
Sep-27-03 02:29 PM |
#46 |
| -
That was a fair post on Carlos' part and I clarified my statement |
JVS |
Sep-27-03 02:31 PM |
#49 |
| -
Honestly, Carlos? Yes, I do. |
Mairead |
Sep-27-03 02:39 PM |
#50 |
| -
Enjoy your fantasy |
jiacinto |
Sep-27-03 03:04 PM |
#54 |
| -
It's not a fantasy, Carlos, it's the statement you asked for. |
Mairead |
Sep-27-03 03:17 PM |
#59 |
| -
Fair enough |
jiacinto |
Sep-27-03 04:34 PM |
#73 |
| -
You never answered my questions |
Mairead |
Sep-27-03 04:44 PM |
#74 |
| -
Now how did I know that you'd duck these questions, Carlos? |
Mairead |
Sep-29-03 02:23 AM |
#90 |
| -
I think the Democratic Party is hopeless, though there are some good |
RichM |
Sep-27-03 02:03 PM |
#31 |
| -
I've come back to the party |
quaker bill |
Sep-27-03 02:30 PM |
#47 |
| -
Thank you! |
dralston |
Sep-27-03 02:44 PM |
#51 |
| -
Why only one? |
Mairead |
Sep-27-03 03:05 PM |
#55 |
| -
Tell you what |
quaker bill |
Sep-27-03 03:07 PM |
#57 |
| -
Deal |
dralston |
Sep-27-03 03:26 PM |
#62 |
| -
Good point |
RandomUser |
Sep-28-03 06:05 PM |
#87 |
| -
Okay, at least one! |
dralston |
Sep-27-03 03:16 PM |
#58 |
| -
Personally |
quaker bill |
Sep-27-03 03:05 PM |
#56 |
| -
best post i've seen today |
eileen_d |
Sep-27-03 03:48 PM |
#67 |
| -
funny, I started in the center |
Terwilliger |
Sep-27-03 03:59 PM |
#68 |
| -
i STILL havent seen any definition!!! |
Kamika |
Sep-27-03 03:17 PM |
#60 |
| -
Okay, try these -- I think they'd be fairly widely supported |
Mairead |
Sep-27-03 03:25 PM |
#61 |
| -
that cant be right |
Kamika |
Sep-27-03 03:28 PM |
#63 |
| -
Lieberman? |
dralston |
Sep-27-03 03:34 PM |
#64 |
| -
wto supports the poor too |
Kamika |
Sep-27-03 03:46 PM |
#66 |
| -
Exploitation is not support |
dralston |
Sep-27-03 04:30 PM |
#72 |
| -
If you look more closely, I'm sure you can find several who |
Mairead |
Sep-27-03 04:08 PM |
#70 |
| -
It is a view of government responsibility |
JellyBean1 |
Sep-27-03 04:57 PM |
#75 |
| -
part inertia, |
ulysses |
Sep-27-03 04:08 PM |
#69 |
| -
Kick... |
Q |
Sep-27-03 05:33 PM |
#76 |
| -
In answer |
RandomUser |
Sep-27-03 06:19 PM |
#77 |
| -
thank you |
Iverson |
Sep-27-03 09:12 PM |
#78 |
| -
Are people through with these concerns? |
Iverson |
Sep-28-03 03:07 PM |
#79 |
| -
Dunno |
RandomUser |
Sep-28-03 03:33 PM |
#80 |
| -
Adversity makes strange bedfellows |
knight_of_the_star |
Sep-28-03 03:39 PM |
#81 |
| -
this is pretty much where i stand as well nt |
noiretblu |
Sep-28-03 03:47 PM |
#83 |
| -
noiretblu and knightofthestar |
Iverson |
Sep-28-03 04:24 PM |
#84 |
| -
a kick |
noiretblu |
Sep-28-03 06:53 PM |
#88 |
| -
flames, flames, flames, flames |
noiretblu |
Sep-28-03 07:07 PM |
#89 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread