Reply #129: LOL....

[rinsd]

First off, my first post wasn't even addressed to you unless you are posting under two names. Though I also made that mistake in my intial reponse, so we can actually drop that one.

Here was my response to the intial poster who stated they usually don't make such suppositions.

Your stuff was even loonier with suppositions about looking beaten. Have you ever seen a young child introduced to a large group of adults? They tend to hold on to Mom or Dad for dear life for a little while until they are comfortable even when they know the pople (ie: family). That a child reacted that way during a press conferences with cameras is not surprising.

"
What was a casual observation to me was an opportunity for you to demonstrate your ethical and intellectual "superiority" on a public forum"

Nicely played. Assuming victimhood is the usual go to move after you've been caught being petty.

Lounge comments are abound in this thead dealing with the Easter gets ups, 50's look, comparisons to Gulliani etc. Many of them are funny and semi-good natured(well its not like we actually like the guy). You decided to join in on the pop psych fun which was ridiculous.