You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: The docs were retyped [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
kurtyboy Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. The docs were retyped
And the originals returned to the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Are Downing Street memos authentic or elaborate hoax? (Rathergate attempt) sabra  Jun-19-05 11:40 PM   #0 
  - There is a full response at Raw Story and Washington Monthly  rawstory   Jun-19-05 11:42 PM   #1 
  - They are desperate...  sabra   Jun-19-05 11:46 PM   #4 
  - I agree, let them challenge the authenticity all they want.  dissent1977   Jun-20-05 12:16 AM   #24 
     - Evidence?  Jackpine Radical   Jun-20-05 12:38 AM   #28 
  - Blair's response to the memo from the WH transcript.....  True_Blue   Jun-20-05 01:24 AM   #34 
  - it's the standard M.O.  radfringe   Jun-20-05 05:01 AM   #47 
  - WorldNetDaily. Say no more. n/t  rooboy   Jun-19-05 11:42 PM   #2 
  - but after the success of Rathergate--people are ready to believe they  rodeodance   Jun-20-05 04:30 AM   #45 
     - IMO Rathergate was not a hoax  goclark   Jun-20-05 08:44 AM   #61 
  - Oh, how they wish.  aquart   Jun-19-05 11:46 PM   #3 
  - here's a good reason...  bejammin075   Jun-19-05 11:48 PM   #5 
  - Obvioulsy Blair would know whether he  bejammin075   Jun-19-05 11:48 PM   #7 
  - I'm guessing his appointment  xxqqqzme   Jun-19-05 11:58 PM   #10 
     - Perhaps we can make this backfire on freepers  bejammin075   Jun-20-05 12:06 AM   #18 
        - Cried "fraud" er "wolf" one too many times.  bejammin075   Jun-20-05 12:12 AM   # 
  - Quite right. Excellent point. (n/t)  evermind   Jun-20-05 03:11 AM   #42 
  - WTF????  jojo54   Jun-19-05 11:48 PM   #6 
  - So lets counter  Brundle_Fly   Jun-19-05 11:51 PM   #8 
  - rotflmao!!!!! Poor rightwingnuts; one-trick morans!  LynnTheDem   Jun-19-05 11:58 PM   #9 
  - Oh yeah, by the way, MIKE SMITH had them retyped. To protect his sources.  LynnTheDem   Jun-20-05 12:00 AM   #12 
     - "legal desk secretary typed the text up on an old fashioned typewriter."  rodeodance   Jun-20-05 08:13 AM   #59 
  - Many of the same blogs that successfully challenged Dan Rather's documents  Bravo411   Jun-19-05 11:59 PM   #11 
  - These leaked documents are in fact 100% authentic. NONE of them  LynnTheDem   Jun-20-05 12:02 AM   #15 
  - I was talking about the Rather documents.  Bravo411   Jun-21-05 07:19 PM   #74 
  - Dude, Not a single doc from that CBS story was discredited  kurtyboy   Jun-20-05 12:14 AM   #22 
  - I was under the impression  Bravo411   Jun-21-05 07:13 PM   #73 
  - Third time I've seen this, yet my response hasn't changed:  chalky   Jun-20-05 12:00 AM   #13 
  - With one caveat. With an independent investigator, under oath.  Old and In the Way   Jun-20-05 02:07 AM   #39 
  - self delete  indie_voter   Jun-20-05 10:14 AM   #64 
  - "At what point in time"....still atrociously redundant...  aquart   Jun-20-05 02:33 AM   #40 
  - This attempt to derail DSM is definitely out there.  assclown_bush   Jun-20-05 12:01 AM   #14 
  - No it's not "working to some extent". Only total fools would think UK gov  LynnTheDem   Jun-20-05 12:13 AM   #21 
     - It's "working to some extent" because it is being discussed here. n/t  assclown_bush   Jun-20-05 12:49 AM   #31 
        - Being discussed does not equate with "working" to discredit. nt  LynnTheDem   Jun-20-05 01:40 AM   #35 
           - LynnTheDem, "working to some extent" is not the same as....  assclown_bush   Jun-20-05 10:05 AM   #63 
              - What is "working" then?  LynnTheDem   Jun-20-05 10:18 AM   #65 
                 - Depends on whether or not the definition of "working" is working. LOL  assclown_bush   Jun-20-05 03:54 PM   #72 
  - Originals destroyed?  Whoa_Nelly   Jun-20-05 12:05 AM   #16 
  - The docs were retyped  kurtyboy   Jun-20-05 12:15 AM   #23 
  - No they're not destroyed.  LynnTheDem   Jun-20-05 12:16 AM   #25 
  - "Originals destroyed" - Don't remember that fact either but...  ngGale   Jun-20-05 12:35 AM   #26 
  - He did not destroy any originals. He returned the set of originals given  LynnTheDem   Jun-20-05 01:42 AM   #36 
     - It was these photocopies that I worked on, destroying them.."  rodeodance   Jun-20-05 08:10 AM   #58 
  - It's just a reference to the fact that Michael Smith has said he made  evermind   Jun-20-05 03:01 AM   #41 
  - BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!  Julius Civitatus   Jun-20-05 12:05 AM   #17 
  - I do not recall the info on the AWOL being challenged only..  Disturbed   Jun-20-05 12:12 AM   #20 
  - Reshaping the story  stanwyck   Jun-20-05 05:57 AM   #50 
  - Hard to teach an old dingbat new tricks.  Prag   Jun-20-05 11:39 AM   #71 
  - Damn conspiracy buffs.  HR_Pufnstuf   Jun-20-05 12:09 AM   #19 
  - debunked  HR_Pufnstuf   Jun-20-05 12:42 AM   #30 
  - Sweating  warrens   Jun-20-05 12:37 AM   #27 
  - They'll convince themselves that they're forged...And say they are  JohnnyRingo   Jun-20-05 12:41 AM   #29 
  - I agree that the core of the bushBots will say this is smoke n mirrors,  assclown_bush   Jun-20-05 12:55 AM   #32 
  - Just so long as they talk about them....  SleeplessinSoCal   Jun-20-05 01:01 AM   #33 
  - As stupid as a rightwingnut. That's how stupid one has to be to trick  LynnTheDem   Jun-20-05 01:45 AM   #37 
  - There was only one alleged fake memo  magellan   Jun-20-05 02:05 AM   #38 
  - Yeah... well...  Puzzler   Jun-20-05 04:01 AM   #43 
  - nominated--this is serious (expected yes but serious).  rodeodance   Jun-20-05 04:12 AM   #44 
  - On top of that, many don't realize these leaks began last September  magellan   Jun-20-05 05:46 AM   #49 
  - Tony the bLiar already confirmed the authenticity  LynnTheDem   Jun-20-05 10:21 AM   #66 
  - i wonder when this will hit the msm?--or has it already?  rodeodance   Jun-20-05 04:38 AM   #46 
  - Saw This Coming Days Ago  Crisco   Jun-20-05 05:21 AM   #48 
  - it was just a matter of time...  sabra   Jun-20-05 06:32 AM   #52 
  - Hardball  Ellen Rose   Jun-20-05 06:26 AM   #51 
  - If this is the same Chris Matthews that was feeding lines to Rice last  evermind   Jun-20-05 07:28 AM   #53 
     - One British MP could kill this debate at a stroke, if he/she were to ask  evermind   Jun-20-05 07:31 AM   #54 
     - Chris  Ellen Rose   Jun-20-05 07:41 AM   #55 
     - "Old News" is actually a confirmation  liam97   Jun-20-05 07:44 AM   #56 
     - yes--i am skeptical if it will help the cause with tweety bird talking.  rodeodance   Jun-20-05 07:45 AM   #57 
  - If the memos aren't real, why hasn't Blair or someone on his end said so?  rocknation   Jun-20-05 08:34 AM   #60 
  - it doesn't matter  Snivi Yllom   Jun-20-05 08:47 AM   #62 
  - It is my understanding that there are now eight ...  dchill   Jun-20-05 10:21 AM   #67 
  - Desperate, aren't they?  redqueen   Jun-20-05 10:24 AM   #68 
  - MHO, the money quote  indie_voter   Jun-20-05 10:47 AM   #69 
  - This is SOP.  drm604   Jun-20-05 11:38 AM   #70 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC