Reply #87: The main plank of the article seems to be the 100 year ban

[muriel_volestrangler]

on the Hughes report on Hamilton in 1991. Although the article was obviously written recently, it fails to mention that the 100-year ban was lifted in March 2003, with just the names of the children involved blanked out (the original reason given for the 10-year ban was protecting the anonymity of the children). So it's not exactly an unbiased look at the facts. In fact, it's back in the realm of crank conspiracy without evidence.