Reply #38: Hi Katinmn

[evermind]

You're right to be "hesitant", and if you mean me, there's no need to apologise at all. In fact, if anyone should, it would be me, for my slightly steamed-up reply.

As you can see, not least from the links in post #36 there's plenty of other supporting evidence for the fact the docs were leaked. It's very likely, but not absolutely certain, I suppose, that the docs at cryptome are the exact leaked documents. At the time, the Daily Telegraph provided the docs as a link, but for me it was broken, so I can't absolutely verify it contained the exact files that cryptome had.

Anyone wanting further verification might consider contacting

Michael Lewis
Christ's College
St Andrew's Street
Cambridge CB2 3BU

Email: mhl24 at cam.ac.uk

(from the email at http://lists.stir.ac.uk/pipermail/media-watch/2004-October/001523.html )

Or perhaps Glen Rangwala (via http://www.middleeastreference.org.uk ) who I think is involved with the apparently quiescent campaign to impeach Blair