You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: Scared shitless huh? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Scared shitless huh?
Explain to me why they're absolutely gushin over him.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Reagan was also more... benign than Bush and I would prefer suffering an unasthethized root canal than to vote for him.

That bucket carries no water.

The American people are so sick of Bush that this is our best chance to vote in the most progressive candidate we have. Progressives aren't going to waste this chance just because the DLC wants to remain in charge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Clark *is* the Military Industrial Complex (Wall Street Journal) WhoCountsTheVotes  Sep-18-03 02:03 PM   #0 
  - Interesting.  madfloridian   Sep-18-03 02:09 PM   #1 
  - With all the hubbub surrounding Clark, I'm glad to hear a dissenting  RandomKoolzip   Sep-18-03 02:10 PM   #2 
  - Clark can go to hell. n/t  Enraged American   Sep-18-03 02:11 PM   #3 
  - What about Dean can go to hell because he is not...  PROGRESSIVE1   Sep-18-03 02:24 PM   #9 
     - Dean never said he was.  peabody71   Sep-18-03 02:30 PM   #12 
     - how did dean come into this???  seekthetruth   Sep-18-03 02:31 PM   #13 
     - I don;t support Dean either. I support Kucinich n/t  Enraged American   Sep-18-03 02:54 PM   #23 
        - I'm SICK and tired of all of this Clark Bashing!  PROGRESSIVE1   Sep-18-03 02:58 PM   #25 
           - the flipside is also true  Forkboy   Sep-18-03 08:16 PM   #45 
  - But it comes from  ArkDem   Sep-18-03 02:13 PM   #4 
  - Not the editorial page, the WSJ reporters - the best in the world  WhoCountsTheVotes   Sep-18-03 02:16 PM   #6 
     - I was being sarcastic.  ArkDem   Sep-18-03 02:18 PM   #7 
  - If you Google for Lippo Worthen Stephens BCCI Clinton  barbaraann   Sep-18-03 02:13 PM   #5 
  - Googling Clinton=VRWC hits  rsammel   Sep-19-03 01:01 AM   #70 
  - This creeps me out. Don't we already have a war profiteer for president?  Demobrat   Sep-18-03 02:23 PM   #8 
  - I'm shaking my head in disbelief!!!  cally   Sep-18-03 02:26 PM   #10 
  - Reasonable People: Read This Post  DoveTurnedHawk   Sep-18-03 04:30 PM   #33 
  - If he really wants to be president and a Democrat, he could have  AP   Sep-18-03 04:35 PM   #34 
  - I agree mostly  WhoCountsTheVotes   Sep-18-03 11:41 PM   #68 
  - It's called misdirection  gratuitous   Sep-18-03 02:29 PM   #11 
  - Good observation gratuitous...eom  oasis   Sep-18-03 02:38 PM   #15 
  - Clark didn't make "investments" - he was hired as a lobbyist  WhoCountsTheVotes   Sep-18-03 02:42 PM   #17 
  - Did you quote precisely?  Waistdeep   Sep-18-03 02:34 PM   #14 
  - I quoted from the article, the headlines are mine  WhoCountsTheVotes   Sep-18-03 02:39 PM   #16 
  - Ahh - the sweet smell of redemption.  DisgustedTX   Sep-18-03 02:43 PM   #18 
  - The Wall Street Journal  Skwmom   Sep-18-03 02:44 PM   #19 
  - Their reporters are very good  Forkboy   Sep-18-03 02:51 PM   #21 
  - Do you have a link?  Brian Sweat   Sep-18-03 02:49 PM   #20 
  - Excellent post -- one of the few really constructive ones on Clark.  RichM   Sep-18-03 02:53 PM   #22 
  - DON'T TRUST what you read on WSJ.  maha   Sep-18-03 02:55 PM   #24 
  - ha ha yeah nice try maha  WhoCountsTheVotes   Sep-18-03 02:59 PM   #26 
     - I might have time, I might not.  maha   Sep-18-03 03:01 PM   #27 
     - Are you claiming Clark isn't on these defense contractor's boards?  WhoCountsTheVotes   Sep-18-03 03:07 PM   #28 
     - "I might have time, I might not."  Forkboy   Sep-18-03 03:09 PM   #29 
     - My first crack at a 'candidate-bashing' thread...  Q   Sep-18-03 03:23 PM   #31 
  - THE WSJ - F***ING WHORES  Skittles   Sep-18-03 03:15 PM   #30 
  - Yep, quite an, uh, "oversight" on their part, isn't it?  Eloriel   Sep-18-03 04:50 PM   #35 
     - Nope, they talk about Cheney and Halliburton all the time  WhoCountsTheVotes   Sep-18-03 08:34 PM   #48 
        - F*** OFF  Skittles   Sep-18-03 09:23 PM   #62 
           - lol  Forkboy   Sep-18-03 09:34 PM   #64 
           - thanks for bringing that up  WhoCountsTheVotes   Sep-18-03 10:05 PM   #67 
  - A little more on Acxiom  madfloridian   Sep-18-03 04:30 PM   #32 
  - Holy shit!  Eloriel   Sep-18-03 04:55 PM   #37 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-18-03 04:54 PM   #36 
  - i've been saying this for months here that....  ElsewheresDaughter   Sep-18-03 05:07 PM   #38 
  - Great stuff. Please post the link to save us time.  Tinoire   Sep-18-03 05:21 PM   #39 
  - Bottom line  Nashyra   Sep-18-03 08:03 PM   #40 
     - Scared shitless huh?  Tinoire   Sep-18-03 08:12 PM   #44 
  - Wow the clark haters are going as far as quoting the WSJ.  IranianDemocrat   Sep-18-03 08:05 PM   #41 
  - are these facts untrue?  Aidoneus   Sep-18-03 08:08 PM   #42 
  - Notice not a single Clark supporter has refuted anything yet  Forkboy   Sep-18-03 08:11 PM   #43 
     - noticed that too  Aidoneus   Sep-18-03 08:17 PM   #46 
        - no link?  grasswire   Sep-18-03 08:32 PM   #47 
        - unless condescending & dismissive arrogance now counts for "refutation".  Sterling   Sep-18-03 08:58 PM   #55 
  - WSJ: First to report about the Binladens and Carlyle Group  WhoCountsTheVotes   Sep-18-03 08:39 PM   #50 
  - One Clark supporter has a pic of Clark in front of a tank  Sterling   Sep-18-03 08:39 PM   #49 
  - This from the Whore Street Journal  Unknown Known   Sep-18-03 08:47 PM   #51 
  - Yes  Forkboy   Sep-18-03 08:48 PM   #52 
     - Funny but this rag never printed articles like this about Carlyle!  Unknown Known   Sep-18-03 08:55 PM   #53 
     - Ehhmm  Sterling   Sep-18-03 09:01 PM   #56 
     - Sorry, but I don't just take people's word - show me the links please  Unknown Known   Sep-18-03 09:20 PM   #61 
     - Again..that's all well and good  Forkboy   Sep-18-03 09:12 PM   #58 
        - From what I see in this so-called "article" is basically nothing  Unknown Known   Sep-18-03 09:30 PM   #63 
           - I agree  Forkboy   Sep-18-03 09:36 PM   #65 
     - These Pubs are scared shitless of Clark, he being one of the best the Dems  opihimoimoi   Sep-18-03 08:56 PM   #54 
        - Yeah but compared to Bush I'M fit to be president  Forkboy   Sep-18-03 09:14 PM   #59 
  - This IS the Wall Street Journal, you know.  neuvocat   Sep-18-03 09:06 PM   #57 
  - consider the source considered  Forkboy   Sep-18-03 09:15 PM   #60 
     - In his defense, you did say he hadn't made much money?  Generic Other   Sep-19-03 01:29 AM   #72 
  - Re: This Article  Bertrand   Sep-18-03 09:41 PM   #66 
  - Has anyone Googled?  MrPrax   Sep-19-03 12:26 AM   #69 
  - ah ha  sujan   Sep-19-03 01:03 AM   #71 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC