You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #39: Exactly... Some are banned for holding clearly non-progressive views [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Exactly... Some are banned for holding clearly non-progressive views
as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Is my definition of 'progressive' right or wrong? WilliamPitt  Apr-29-05 04:28 PM   #0 
  - Seems like a perfectly utilitarian definition, to me.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 04:31 PM   #1 
  - Hear! Hear!  Tandalayo_Scheisskopf   Apr-29-05 04:31 PM   #2 
  - Lemme see...  derby378   Apr-29-05 04:35 PM   #3 
  - bs  ananda   Apr-29-05 04:36 PM   #4 
  - Too simple  Squeech   Apr-29-05 04:37 PM   #5 
  - Trying to find your way  MuseRider   Apr-29-05 04:38 PM   #6 
  - We actually WERE a diverse party in the past, weren't we?  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 04:40 PM   #8 
     - Yes but I would add  MuseRider   Apr-29-05 04:49 PM   #9 
     - I want to add more here.  MuseRider   Apr-29-05 04:54 PM   #10 
        - Oh, I agree with you.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 04:58 PM   #12 
           - Good. I get nervous  MuseRider   Apr-29-05 05:05 PM   #21 
              - Disagreement is fine.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:14 PM   #30 
  - As long as those basic tenets are met... I can take the wiggle room.  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 04:40 PM   #7 
  - I second that  Solly Mack   Apr-29-05 04:56 PM   #11 
  - Except for Zell Miller, I can't think of anyone like that.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 04:59 PM   #13 
     - Unfortunately they aren't so few and far between...  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:00 PM   #14 
        - I second that too  Solly Mack   Apr-29-05 05:02 PM   #15 
        - Offhand, I can't think of many others.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:02 PM   #16 
           - Offhand I can think of dozens...  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:04 PM   #18 
              - Hmm...  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:04 PM   #19 
                 - Interesting...  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:05 PM   #20 
                 - I've seen freepers...  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:06 PM   #22 
                    - And I've seen Duers...  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:07 PM   #23 
                       - If they violate the rules, you should do just that.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:09 PM   #25 
                          - Oh really?  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:15 PM   #31 
                             - Most are banned for other reasons.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:17 PM   #34 
                             - Exactly... Some are banned for holding clearly non-progressive views  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:24 PM   #39 
                                - Can't think of a time it's ever happened.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:25 PM   #40 
                                   - And because you can't think of a time, it couldn't possible happen.  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:28 PM   #44 
                                      - That's not what I said.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:30 PM   #48 
                                         - Mmm hmm... Well, fortunately...  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:35 PM   #52 
                                            - There always has been.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:37 PM   #54 
                             - not every progressive is perfectly progressive  hfojvt   Apr-29-05 06:09 PM   #68 
                                - Well, of course not... where did I say that?  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 06:35 PM   #74 
                 - Not even the posters who advocate sacrificing the rights of others?  Solly Mack   Apr-29-05 05:07 PM   #24 
                    - Now there's a litmus test that makes sense...  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:10 PM   #26 
                    - I've never seen any DUer advocate that...  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:11 PM   #27 
                    - Do a search and you will  Solly Mack   Apr-29-05 05:16 PM   #33 
                    - That's a rather difficult search to perform.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:18 PM   #35 
                       - try a boolean, it works on DU search  Solly Mack   Apr-29-05 05:20 PM   #36 
                          - But for *what*?  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:21 PM   #38 
                             - You're kidding right? You can't think of a single term that would  Solly Mack   Apr-29-05 05:27 PM   #42 
                                - You've actually seen posts *advocating* those?  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:29 PM   #45 
                                   - Yep. Sure have...  Solly Mack   Apr-29-05 05:30 PM   #47 
                                   - Interesting.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:32 PM   #50 
                                      - LOL  Solly Mack   Apr-29-05 05:41 PM   #56 
                                         - Have a nice day.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:43 PM   #58 
                                         - LOL... I don't feel special anymore...  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:45 PM   #60 
                                         - But you are special!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Solly Mack   Apr-29-05 05:46 PM   #62 
                                         - YAY  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:50 PM   #64 
                                   - You didn't happen to catch the recent poll then, about what DUers  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:32 PM   #51 
                                      - Have a nice day.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:36 PM   #53 
                                         - I don't understand...does that mean that you did not see those anti-rights  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:43 PM   #57 
                                            - It means I won't reply to a post containing a personal attack. n/t  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:44 PM   #59 
                                            - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-29-05 05:46 PM   #61 
                                            - It's easy:  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:47 PM   #63 
                                            - You lost me.  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:51 PM   #65 
                                            - That's as plainly stated as I can make it.n/t  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 05:52 PM   #66 
                                            - Jesus  WilliamPitt   Apr-29-05 06:12 PM   #69 
                                            - Yep.  Cuban_Liberal   Apr-29-05 06:15 PM   #70 
                                            - Gee.. Thanks. Glad I could help.  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 06:31 PM   #73 
                    - Wow... You've been missing a lot... gay rights, women's rights, abortion  Misunderestimator   Apr-29-05 05:26 PM   #41 
                    - It's my scratch and sniff test  Solly Mack   Apr-29-05 05:15 PM   #32 
                    - Republican Lite doesn't qualify as Democratic, IMO  ultraist   Apr-29-05 05:30 PM   #46 
                       - I agree  Solly Mack   Apr-29-05 05:31 PM   #49 
                          - LOL!  ultraist   Apr-29-05 05:38 PM   #55 
                             - Oh yeah..I'm from Georgia...I understand completely  Solly Mack   Apr-29-05 05:54 PM   #67 
  - When Blue Dog Democrats have joined hands with the GOP  Robbien   Apr-29-05 05:03 PM   #17 
  - Doesn't work for me  housewolf   Apr-29-05 05:12 PM   #28 
  - Yep. That reflects my understanding of "progressive:.  Just Me   Apr-29-05 05:12 PM   #29 
  - There are varying degrees of "progressive"  ultraist   Apr-29-05 05:21 PM   #37 
  - I am going to splinter here  hfojvt   Apr-29-05 05:28 PM   #43 
  - 'That which makes progress.'  bloom   Apr-29-05 06:24 PM   #71 
  - you're right  DupontCons24   Apr-29-05 06:26 PM   #72 
  - Buh-Bye!  Kathy in Cambridge   Apr-29-05 06:40 PM   #75 
  - Locking.  Moderator   Apr-29-05 06:42 PM   #76 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC