You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: OK, so if the federal district judge [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
ohio_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. OK, so if the federal district judge
throws it out as unconstitutional, what's next on the Republican agenda? Anyone care guess?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Judge picked for Shiavo case Walt Starr  Mar-21-05 08:25 AM   #0 
  - I hope that Judge...  Tandalayo_Scheisskopf   Mar-21-05 08:30 AM   #1 
  - I hope they're gonna give him bodyguards  Danmel   Mar-21-05 08:34 AM   #2 
  - The Today show said he was "appointed by Clinton"  underpants   Mar-21-05 08:36 AM   #3 
  - That's OK 'cause "Bush" is often not considered a president anyway  Mr_Spock   Mar-21-05 09:00 AM   #10 
  - Ah! there's the rub...When this man does his job, and tosses this  AzDar   Mar-21-05 08:37 AM   #4 
  - the CLENIS made 'em remove the tube!  bunkerbuster1   Mar-21-05 08:39 AM   #5 
  - Yep! You got it!  Carni   Mar-21-05 09:55 AM   #20 
     - As I have said before I don't think the fundies will settle for that  underpants   Mar-21-05 09:59 AM   #22 
        - You may be right!  Carni   Mar-21-05 10:03 AM   #25 
           - Oh I forgot about "Holy Week"  underpants   Mar-21-05 10:06 AM   #26 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-21-05 10:12 AM   #33 
              - "Terri survived her passion weekend."  ultraist   Mar-21-05 10:42 AM   #40 
                 - Well, we knew after "Christmas Under Siege," these evil ratf*ckers  bunkerbuster1   Mar-21-05 11:22 AM   #55 
                    - Our gov has become a full blown Theocracy  ultraist   Mar-21-05 11:26 AM   #56 
  - Yep  underpants   Mar-21-05 08:45 AM   #7 
  - Yet the judge was confirmed by a Republican Senate  Freddie Stubbs   Mar-21-05 10:31 AM   #37 
  - Can I ask a question? Why was this judge in the federal courthouse  mohinoaklawnillinois   Mar-21-05 08:40 AM   #6 
  - They're Open 24 by 7... Like a 7-11  GiovanniC   Mar-21-05 09:24 AM   #15 
  - The Freakers are already primed to blame the Magical Wonder Clenis  Walt Starr   Mar-21-05 09:25 AM   #16 
     - "Did the Congressional Bill order the Judge to have it re-inserted?"  GiovanniC   Mar-21-05 09:41 AM   #17 
     - Ohh new catchphrase "Deathocrat" -2 references in first 50 posts  underpants   Mar-21-05 09:49 AM   #19 
  - This was "by design"  in_cog_ni_to   Mar-21-05 08:57 AM   #8 
  - A Republican Senate confirmed him  Walt Starr   Mar-21-05 08:57 AM   #9 
  - Looks like it's going to..  ohio_liberal   Mar-21-05 09:13 AM   #11 
  - How is a judge selected, isn't it random?  Toots   Mar-21-05 09:20 AM   #12 
  - It's random  Walt Starr   Mar-21-05 09:22 AM   #13 
  - I can only pray.  deadparrot   Mar-21-05 10:44 AM   #43 
  - Yes. Lottery. (nt)  w4rma   Mar-21-05 09:24 AM   #14 
  - Hearing set for 3PM  Walt Starr   Mar-21-05 09:43 AM   #18 
  - I would expect an injunction  underpants   Mar-21-05 10:01 AM   #23 
     - First thing he has to consider is the constitutionality of the legislation  Walt Starr   Mar-21-05 10:03 AM   #24 
        - OK, so if the federal district judge  ohio_liberal   Mar-21-05 10:07 AM   #27 
        - The case will be appealed to the Atlanta 11th Circuit Court of Appeals  Walt Starr   Mar-21-05 10:09 AM   #29 
        - If they do that would be a huge precident to set, no?  underpants   Mar-21-05 10:11 AM   #31 
        - Yep, if the courts allow this to stand it becomes precedent for every  Walt Starr   Mar-21-05 10:13 AM   #34 
        - ...  ohio_liberal   Mar-21-05 10:15 AM   #36 
        - Court of appeals? The US SC already said No-right?  underpants   Mar-21-05 10:10 AM   #30 
           - That was last week before this legislation passed  Walt Starr   Mar-21-05 10:11 AM   #32 
        - Okay-not a lawyer here but.....  underpants   Mar-21-05 10:09 AM   #28 
  - Clinton nominated a lot of former public defenders to the bench.  AP   Mar-21-05 09:57 AM   #21 
  - This sounds like a good sign to me:  Heidi   Mar-21-05 10:14 AM   #35 
  - Could this judge  Mz Pip   Mar-21-05 10:32 AM   #38 
  - Yes, but such a ruling on merit that quickly would be unlikely  Walt Starr   Mar-21-05 10:33 AM   #39 
     - This worries me on many levels  Mz Pip   Mar-21-05 10:43 AM   #42 
        - But that's the whole point of this!  Walt Starr   Mar-21-05 10:45 AM   #45 
           - So who is going to  Mz Pip   Mar-21-05 10:49 AM   #47 
           - That's where Bush's Texas law becomes the model  Walt Starr   Mar-21-05 10:52 AM   #48 
              - Terri has no money  Mz Pip   Mar-21-05 10:58 AM   #52 
                 - What she has is better than money to the Repukes  Walt Starr   Mar-21-05 11:10 AM   #54 
           - Walt....  BronxBoy   Mar-21-05 12:00 PM   #61 
  - Stetson U. Law School grad - here's your answer!  Grins   Mar-21-05 10:42 AM   #41 
  - I think Stetson is a lower tiered law school too  ultraist   Mar-21-05 10:44 AM   #44 
  - Stetson Lawschool  RuleofLaw   Mar-21-05 11:47 AM   #59 
  - Oh my  ohio_liberal   Mar-21-05 10:49 AM   #46 
  - Don't be, Judge George W. Greer who was the last presiding judge  Walt Starr   Mar-21-05 10:52 AM   #49 
     - Just a couple of days ago?  ohio_liberal   Mar-21-05 10:54 AM   #50 
        - The only thing that makes me smile  ohio_liberal   Mar-21-05 10:55 AM   #51 
           - culture of life  nickfaldo7   Mar-21-05 10:58 AM   #53 
              - "culture of life" applies only to white "Christians"  ultraist   Mar-21-05 11:36 AM   #57 
  - My brother graduated from Stetson...  janx   Mar-21-05 12:01 PM   #62 
  - **Heads up! Watch for a data dump today***  underpants   Mar-21-05 11:38 AM   #58 
  - Hearing set for today at 3:00 pm  RuleofLaw   Mar-21-05 11:50 AM   #60 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC