You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #67: Wrong [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #60
67. Wrong
Several nations have already said they won't send troops unless the US surrenders military authority to the UN. The UN resolution that Bush* has submitted for consideration places the intl troops under US authority, not their own authority.

Bush is going to have to make the concessions he should have made in the first place.

There is only one concession needed, as demonstrated by the concessions requested by those nations (India, Turkey, Australia, etc) who might be willing to send troops - Hand military authority to the UN.

Like Bush*, Dean is unwilling to do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Is Dean waffling on Iraq???????? tedthebear  Sep-12-03 03:23 PM   #0 
  - Yawn  AWD   Sep-12-03 03:23 PM   #1 
  - hey, it actually looks like strongbad is yawning there  ryharrin   Sep-12-03 03:25 PM   #2 
  - ryharrin - is that jeb or george picking their nose? n/t  janekat   Sep-12-03 04:59 PM   #92 
  - People are getting desperate to discredit Dean.  janx   Sep-12-03 03:26 PM   #4 
  - Ah,ah, ah....  RUMMYisFROSTED   Sep-12-03 03:57 PM   #42 
  - Dean  kwolf68   Sep-12-03 03:26 PM   #3 
  - Those endorements are already given to Kerry.  liberalnurse   Sep-12-03 04:05 PM   #55 
  - A lot of people say: stop trying to turn Dean into a Kucinich  E_Zapata   Sep-12-03 03:26 PM   #5 
  - Completely different, and hardly interchangeable.  blm   Sep-12-03 03:28 PM   #7 
     - Still looking for Dean posts?  madfloridian   Sep-12-03 03:31 PM   #10 
        - only half of them.  blm   Sep-12-03 03:40 PM   #22 
  - This is the same message  Langis   Sep-12-03 03:26 PM   #6 
  - SHAME on you for posting that.  madfloridian   Sep-12-03 03:30 PM   #8 
  - The truth comes out  no name no slogan   Sep-12-03 03:34 PM   #14 
  - I am not anti-war either. Just anti-Iraq war.  madfloridian   Sep-12-03 03:35 PM   #16 
  - Ghandi and Jesus had their heads in the clouds then, too  no name no slogan   Sep-12-03 03:41 PM   #24 
     - AMEN  kwolf68   Sep-12-03 04:24 PM   #76 
  - Media's the one  Malikshah   Sep-12-03 03:42 PM   #26 
  - If that's what he means, he better make it perfectly clear...  tedthebear   Sep-13-03 12:13 AM   #94 
  - BS Dean  kwolf68   Sep-12-03 03:31 PM   #9 
  - too many "ifs" and ...  twilight   Sep-12-03 03:33 PM   #12 
  - How simplistic can you get?  clar   Sep-12-03 03:40 PM   #23 
  - Am I missing something?  deutsey   Sep-12-03 03:43 PM   #27 
  - Who knows? Maybe Iraq WOULD be better off if all the foreigners split...  tedthebear   Sep-13-03 12:23 AM   #95 
  - That is what he's saying: Bring in U.N. peacekeepers to replace U.S.  w4rma   Sep-12-03 03:45 PM   #28 
  - So  kwolf68   Sep-12-03 03:52 PM   #37 
  - Yes. Dean strongly opposed the invasion of Iraq. Dean: October 6, 2002.  w4rma   Sep-12-03 04:01 PM   #49 
  - Dean is insane if he believes that  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:02 PM   #51 
     - U.N. troops will likely be led by U.N. leadership or their respective  w4rma   Sep-12-03 04:09 PM   #60 
        - Wrong  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:14 PM   #67 
           - See post #72  w4rma   Sep-12-03 04:30 PM   #81 
              - Post #72 is in a foreign language  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:34 PM   #83 
  - The Bottom Line  MGKrebs   Sep-12-03 06:06 PM   #93 
  - As much as I wish we had not gone into Iraq  deutsey   Sep-12-03 03:31 PM   #11 
  - The only way to get int'l troops in  sangh0   Sep-12-03 03:35 PM   #15 
  - He has.  madfloridian   Sep-12-03 03:42 PM   #25 
  - Wrong. Please tell the truth  sangh0   Sep-12-03 03:47 PM   #30 
     - Here is some more info.  madfloridian   Sep-12-03 03:59 PM   #46 
        - Your ignoring the issue, and Dean is being disingenous  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:06 PM   #58 
           - I found this paragraph, but you are so angry, you won't care.  madfloridian   Sep-12-03 04:14 PM   #66 
              - Read it again  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:16 PM   # 
  - Let me speak really slowly  clar   Sep-12-03 04:06 PM   #57 
     - NO DEAN HAS NOT SAID THAT  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:08 PM   #59 
        - U.N. troops will likely be led by U.N. leadership or their respective  w4rma   Sep-12-03 04:13 PM   #63 
           - Wrong  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:15 PM   #68 
              - Here.  madfloridian   Sep-12-03 04:17 PM   #70 
              - Other nations want the UN to have military authority over Iraq  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:19 PM   #73 
              - See post #72  w4rma   Sep-12-03 04:29 PM   #80 
                 - post #72 is in a foreign language  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:35 PM   #85 
  - LOL  kwolf68   Sep-12-03 03:38 PM   #19 
     - Well put  sangh0   Sep-12-03 03:49 PM   #33 
     - Gosh, thanks for taking the scales from my eyes  deutsey   Sep-12-03 03:53 PM   #38 
        - And  kwolf68   Sep-12-03 03:55 PM   #39 
           - Yep. Didn't did NOT "oppose the war"  sangh0   Sep-12-03 03:58 PM   #44 
           - So  kwolf68   Sep-12-03 04:03 PM   #53 
              - I want to see every single post of the zillions you say exist  deutsey   Sep-12-03 04:04 PM   #54 
                 - There is no ax to grind  kwolf68   Sep-12-03 04:20 PM   #74 
           - Well, let's crucify him!!!!  deutsey   Sep-12-03 04:00 PM   #47 
              - And those same people in the anti-war movement  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:10 PM   #62 
  - It's no waffle. It's the same thing he's always been saying.  w4rma   Sep-12-03 03:33 PM   #13 
  - But now, the facts have changed  sangh0   Sep-12-03 03:36 PM   #17 
  - Yes. That is exactly Dean's position. (no change) (n/t)  w4rma   Sep-12-03 03:48 PM   #32 
     - Not true.  sangh0   Sep-12-03 03:50 PM   #34 
        - Dean does not support U.N. leadership over U.S. soldiers. No.  w4rma   Sep-12-03 03:56 PM   #40 
           - Then Dean doesn't want to "win the peace"  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:00 PM   #48 
              - U.N. troops will likely be led by U.N. leadership or their respective  w4rma   Sep-12-03 04:05 PM   #56 
                 - Wrong  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:13 PM   #65 
                    - I have never read that anywhere. Please provide a source.  w4rma   Sep-12-03 04:19 PM   #72 
                       - A source for what?  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:21 PM   #75 
                          - Bush is the guy who won't let the UN lead their own troops, not Dean  w4rma   Sep-12-03 04:33 PM   #82 
                             - Once again  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:36 PM   #86 
  - However, Dean suckered in a lot of people  no name no slogan   Sep-12-03 03:39 PM   #21 
     - Dean's position is to get the U.N. peacekeepers in to replace U.S. troops.  w4rma   Sep-12-03 03:51 PM   #35 
     - But Dean doesn't say how he'd get that done  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:17 PM   #71 
        - Bush is the guy who won't let the UN lead their own troops, not Dean  w4rma   Sep-12-03 04:34 PM   #84 
           - The UN has no troops  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:48 PM   #89 
     - I do  ieoeja   Sep-12-03 03:58 PM   #43 
  - god,  newsguyatl   Sep-12-03 03:37 PM   #18 
  - Yes, a Deanie makes a REASONED ARGUMENT®  no name no slogan   Sep-12-03 03:52 PM   #36 
  - Oh, wait! This is about those who think we should just get out now.  madfloridian   Sep-12-03 03:38 PM   #20 
  - It's called "debate" and "a free exchange of ideas"  no name no slogan   Sep-12-03 03:46 PM   #29 
  - No one has jumped on Dean  kwolf68   Sep-12-03 03:47 PM   #31 
  - I am a Dean Supporter  montanacowboy   Sep-12-03 03:56 PM   #41 
  - Is it worth it? Do you care? OK, here goes:  MGKrebs   Sep-12-03 03:59 PM   #45 
  - You're wasting your time...  deutsey   Sep-12-03 04:03 PM   #52 
  - LMAO  kwolf68   Sep-12-03 04:16 PM   #69 
  - Fair enough  kwolf68   Sep-12-03 04:09 PM   #61 
  - Another thing about the grand man  kwolf68   Sep-12-03 04:13 PM   #64 
  - There is one problem with that  sangh0   Sep-12-03 04:26 PM   #78 
  - Here is some info from his site.  madfloridian   Sep-12-03 04:02 PM   #50 
  - No, but he definately has been waffling on Belguim..  SonofMass   Sep-12-03 04:24 PM   #77 
  - SERIOUSLY...I do want to apologize to the Dean supporters  kwolf68   Sep-12-03 04:26 PM   #79 
  - More of the same shit,  haymaker   Sep-12-03 04:38 PM   #87 
  - More tripe  Uzybone   Sep-12-03 04:44 PM   #88 
  - of course he is - he HAS to  janekat   Sep-12-03 04:57 PM   #90 
  - Running to the center  kwolf68   Sep-12-03 04:59 PM   #91 
     - The NRA rating  WaterDog   Sep-13-03 04:33 AM   #97 
  - Dean is Not Waffling on Iraq  Evanstondem   Sep-13-03 12:23 AM   #96 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC