You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: Like the cops knew she was Mrs. Jon Stewart? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
31. Like the cops knew she was Mrs. Jon Stewart?
They were following SOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Jon Stewart's wife was arrested Rose Siding  Mar-11-05 10:06 AM   #0 
  - The harassment begins  dpbrown   Mar-11-05 10:07 AM   #1 
  - why is necessary to handcuff people for these offenses?? I think it is  rodeodance   Mar-11-05 10:09 AM   #2 
  - While I agree about the indignity...  skids   Mar-11-05 10:18 AM   #6 
  - I would understand that kind of treatment for someone that has a record...  Media_Lies_Daily   Mar-11-05 10:32 AM   #15 
  - I was once arrested - the single cop put me in the front seat,  donsu   Mar-11-05 10:42 AM   #28 
     - same here  amazona   Mar-11-05 11:37 AM   #71 
  - its for your own safety  Yuugal   Mar-11-05 10:37 AM   #20 
     - It's for your own safety. Did you get that from the Bush Homeland manual?  shance   Mar-11-05 12:06 PM   #91 
  - It certainly looks that way.  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 10:22 AM   #9 
  - It is that way  dpbrown   Mar-11-05 10:39 AM   #24 
     - So if it was a large man....he should have been cuffed?  rinsd   Mar-11-05 11:37 AM   #72 
     - LOL  FreedomAngel82   Mar-11-05 11:58 AM   #87 
     - Oh, man! Those poopy diapers can KILL you!!  Media_Lies_Daily   Mar-11-05 01:41 PM   #143 
     - The point is,  forgethell   Mar-11-05 03:32 PM   #201 
  - Like the cops knew she was Mrs. Jon Stewart?  Roland99   Mar-11-05 10:45 AM   #31 
  - Like the cops dont track individuals for the Administration?  shance   Mar-11-05 12:10 PM   #95 
  - Dude, a cigar is never just a cigar.  Telly Savalas   Mar-11-05 01:39 PM   #140 
     - LOL  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 02:00 PM   #164 
  - Yes. Harassment by the Bush Administration. Could have at least  shance   Mar-11-05 12:08 PM   #93 
     - Yeah Bush made the call himself!  rinsd   Mar-11-05 12:28 PM   #99 
        - You're right. Im sure this was just ONE more of those coinky dinks.  shance   Mar-11-05 12:43 PM   #105 
           - Or....  rinsd   Mar-11-05 01:12 PM   #115 
              - Let me see if I understand your take on this...  Media_Lies_Daily   Mar-11-05 01:31 PM   #131 
              - "Why was it not processed on the day that they received it? "  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 01:36 PM   #138 
              - Do you have a television show, or are you a well-known television....  Media_Lies_Daily   Mar-11-05 01:46 PM   #149 
                 - Nope just regular old me...  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 01:48 PM   #153 
                    - Yep.  Swamp Rat   Mar-11-05 01:58 PM   #160 
                       - And a howdy back to you, Swamp Rat.  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 02:02 PM   #166 
              - Yes, let's reach an understanding  rinsd   Mar-11-05 01:42 PM   # 
                 - Oh, boy...here we go...  Media_Lies_Daily   Mar-11-05 02:18 PM   #181 
                    - This will be fiun  rinsd   Mar-11-05 02:33 PM   #191 
              - "Keep crying wolf over crap"  Swamp Rat   Mar-11-05 01:42 PM   #148 
              - I have been ARRESTED for a suspended license.  rinsd   Mar-11-05 01:47 PM   #152 
              - Sorry to hear you were treated like a criminal  Swamp Rat   Mar-11-05 01:56 PM   #159 
                 - I would tend to agree....  rinsd   Mar-11-05 02:04 PM   #167 
              - Crap like suspended drivers who kill other drivers?  Snivi Yllom   Mar-11-05 03:50 PM   #204 
                 - Never ceases to amaze me.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 04:22 PM   #209 
                 - Pfffffffffft!  Swamp Rat   Mar-11-05 04:35 PM   #210 
              - LOL! You are so transparent.  shance   Mar-11-05 02:27 PM   #190 
                 - Tasers are for wimps!  rinsd   Mar-11-05 02:40 PM   #194 
  - Isn't that rather aggressive for a suspended license?  peekaloo   Mar-11-05 10:10 AM   #3 
  - No  WilliamPitt   Mar-11-05 10:11 AM   #4 
  - just curious. I was with a friend who was once handcuffed  peekaloo   Mar-11-05 10:21 AM   #8 
  - So you got off on a warning? right?  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 10:23 AM   #10 
  - A warning and a big fat fine  WilliamPitt   Mar-11-05 10:23 AM   #11 
     - I don't have a problem with the fine.  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 10:27 AM   #13 
        - My guess would be  WilliamPitt   Mar-11-05 10:38 AM   #22 
           - Yes, that is the issue.  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 10:53 AM   #37 
              - Anything less than 100%?  rinsd   Mar-11-05 11:15 AM   #52 
              - In the city next door, just within the month or so, the ex-police chief  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 11:25 AM   #58 
                 - Sorry for the dramatic effect....  rinsd   Mar-11-05 11:39 AM   #76 
                    - I'm sorry, your questions answer themselves.  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 11:52 AM   #82 
                       - "Sorry for the dramatic effect" wasn't enough of an acknowledgement?  rinsd   Mar-11-05 12:03 PM   #89 
                       - The only conclusion I jumped to was,  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 12:33 PM   #100 
                          - Agenda?  rinsd   Mar-11-05 01:08 PM   #112 
                             - "so why continue to flog it?"  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 01:23 PM   #123 
                                - Now that's harrassment!  rinsd   Mar-11-05 01:29 PM   #129 
                                   - Okay, you win that one.  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 01:34 PM   #135 
                       - OR  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 12:03 PM   #90 
                          - That's not what the article said. It said the following:  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 12:36 PM   #103 
                          - She was pulled over for a moving violation.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 01:08 PM   #113 
                          - Please go back to the article and quote exactly what the  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 01:24 PM   #124 
                             - What part of moving violation do you not understand.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 01:38 PM   #139 
                             - What part of your post did you not understand?  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 01:41 PM   #145 
                                - Nowhere in my response did i say what it was.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 01:47 PM   #150 
                                - So now we're down to one violation. Good, there's progress.  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 01:53 PM   #156 
                                - A moving violation could mean a number of things.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 02:09 PM   #170 
                                - Okay, in that light, your suppositions are understood.  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 02:16 PM   #177 
                                - This calls for a group hug!  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 02:24 PM   #189 
                                - THAT is the point of the poster's post that you are arguing about?!?..  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 01:47 PM   # 
                                - To justify his position, he wrote a post which was full of conjecture.  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 01:55 PM   #157 
                                - If you re-read his post #90...  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 02:07 PM   #169 
                                - Very weak. There is no conjecture in this statement:  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 02:13 PM   #173 
                                - He was responding to your conjecture in Post #82...  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 02:16 PM   #178 
                                - Self-deleted ...double post  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 01:47 PM   #151 
                             - she brought it on herself  Snivi Yllom   Mar-11-05 04:53 PM   #212 
                          - So...your excerpt only eliminates speeding from the list of 5 offenses...  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 01:10 PM   #114 
                             - ONE unpaid ticket for which the check had "not been processed"....  Media_Lies_Daily   Mar-11-05 01:19 PM   #121 
                             - One unpaind ticket?  rinsd   Mar-11-05 01:26 PM   #126 
                             - I've been shaking my head for two hours.  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 01:33 PM   #133 
                             - "Aren't checks deposited on the same day they arrive? Why the delay?"  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 01:30 PM   #130 
                             - ...why had the check not been processed?  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 01:33 PM   #134 
                             - it's the frigging DMV  northzax   Mar-11-05 02:13 PM   #172 
                             - Please go back to the article and quote  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 01:25 PM   #125 
                                - You already did in post #90. That's what I was responding to.  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 01:32 PM   #132 
                                   - Scenario provided?  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 01:50 PM   #155 
                                      - I've read the article about 10 times. You aren't even following who ..  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 01:56 PM   #158 
                                         - Sorry, Tx.  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 02:00 PM   #163 
                          - Too bad your explanation is complete and utter fiction. Read the article.  Media_Lies_Daily   Mar-11-05 01:12 PM   #116 
                             - Okay, I read the article (again)....  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 01:14 PM   #117 
                             - Exactly read the article  rinsd   Mar-11-05 01:16 PM   #118 
                             - Nobody said speeding.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 01:58 PM   #161 
                                - Yes....unfortunately semantics have taken over (NT)  rinsd   Mar-11-05 02:18 PM   #184 
                             - Point out the fiction before declaring me a liar.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 01:16 PM   #119 
                                - Go back to the article and read the details before posting:  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 01:26 PM   #127 
                                   - Speaking of which...you may have noticed this nugget  rinsd   Mar-11-05 01:29 PM   #128 
                                   - You do realize that now they have to back that up, don't you?  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 01:36 PM   #137 
                                   - And they may do just that, whats your point?  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 01:40 PM   #142 
                                   - LOL! Read my posts from the beginning. That HAS been my  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 02:01 PM   #165 
                                   - I guess you missed my post on selective enforcement.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 02:11 PM   #171 
                                   - TX-RAT, no offense, but I'll probably make a point of missing  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 02:15 PM   #176 
                                   - Self deleted  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 02:18 PM   #182 
                                   - They do it all the time in Dallas....  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 01:41 PM   #144 
                                   - You're arguing two different issues. But since you opened that  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 02:05 PM   #168 
                                   - LOL....when one line of argument fails...  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 02:18 PM   #183 
                                   - Definitely....  rinsd   Mar-11-05 01:49 PM   #154 
                                   - "Following procedure" to a fault. Period. They knew who she was...  Media_Lies_Daily   Mar-11-05 01:40 PM   #141 
                                      - I guess I should feel "flattered" then.  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 01:42 PM   #147 
                                   - You seem to be the one not reading the article.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 01:42 PM   #146 
              - Selective enforcement is a double edged sword.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 11:28 AM   #61 
                 - Wouldn't that be his train of thought every time he encounters it?  The Backlash Cometh   Mar-11-05 11:36 AM   #70 
                    - Is that what you really want?  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 02:14 PM   #174 
  - Same experience with a twist....  rinsd   Mar-11-05 10:29 AM   #14 
  - the only correct solution, I guess  northzax   Mar-11-05 02:19 PM   #185 
     - Happened to my buddy on the 8 here in San Diego....  rinsd   Mar-11-05 02:36 PM   #192 
        - right, but imagine what the tin foilers would be saying  northzax   Mar-11-05 02:39 PM   #193 
  - But, the bottom line is that you weren't arrested, taken to the station,..  Media_Lies_Daily   Mar-11-05 10:35 AM   #17 
  - happened to my brother too  Skittles   Mar-11-05 10:37 AM   #21 
  - Your analogy fails  dpbrown   Mar-11-05 10:40 AM   #25 
  - Jesus  WilliamPitt   Mar-11-05 10:42 AM   #29 
     - And doing so would have been harassment had it happened to you  dpbrown   Mar-11-05 10:48 AM   #33 
     - Not to be an apologist for the guy  WilliamPitt   Mar-11-05 10:54 AM   #38 
     - Not to be a bubble-burster ;-)  dpbrown   Mar-11-05 11:10 AM   #48 
        - You mean the one said to shy away from publicity?  rinsd   Mar-11-05 11:20 AM   #55 
        - To point out a SEXIST error -- that is her BIRTH name.  DELUSIONAL   Mar-11-05 11:24 AM   #57 
        - My apologies (nt)  rinsd   Mar-11-05 11:33 AM   #66 
        - aren't they the same thing? really?  northzax   Mar-11-05 02:22 PM   #186 
        - *lol* this was what i was thinking  MsTryska   Mar-11-05 01:03 PM   #110 
        - I'm a big fan of the Daily Show  yvr girl   Mar-11-05 11:23 AM   #56 
     - Harrassment is arresting someone for breaking the law?  rinsd   Mar-11-05 11:11 AM   #49 
     - so what should you do with someone  northzax   Mar-11-05 02:17 PM   #179 
     - Some departments don't allow their officers that option.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 11:05 AM   #44 
  - me too.  MsTryska   Mar-11-05 12:57 PM   #109 
  - Will, a couple of quick questions....  rinsd   Mar-11-05 01:36 PM   #136 
  - Something similar happened to me...  NewJeffCT   Mar-11-05 02:15 PM   #175 
  - I don't like it either, but it's a just-in-case thing.  NCevilDUer   Mar-11-05 10:18 AM   #7 
  - Actually I think it is.  MessiahRp   Mar-11-05 11:49 AM   #78 
     - Actually it was not paying a previous ticket that led to this.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 11:54 AM   #83 
  - Why would they handcuff someone who has an expired license?  Sparkle   Mar-11-05 10:17 AM   #5 
  - I assume they've got a standard protocol for arresting people,  Stirk   Mar-11-05 10:24 AM   #12 
  - Officially, the cop has no choice.  IMModerate   Mar-11-05 10:47 AM   #32 
  - Makes it easier for cops to Taser or shoot someone who is cuffed.  DELUSIONAL   Mar-11-05 12:08 PM   #92 
  - With some departments it's mandatory.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 10:51 AM   #34 
     - I Just Called My Friend  ProfessorGAC   Mar-11-05 10:59 AM   #42 
        - Oh, I am sure there are exceptions.  Sparkle   Mar-11-05 11:01 AM   #43 
        - I Can Only Report What He Told Me  ProfessorGAC   Mar-11-05 11:15 AM   #50 
        - because they say it doesnt make it true  seabeyond   Mar-11-05 11:19 AM   #54 
           - I'm Not Supporting It  ProfessorGAC   Mar-11-05 11:25 AM   #59 
              - i dont think it was anything personal either  seabeyond   Mar-11-05 11:32 AM   #64 
                 - Bad Girl! Bad!  ProfessorGAC   Mar-11-05 11:34 AM   #67 
  - The license  Dittoz   Mar-11-05 10:36 AM   #18 
  - Perhaps she's large, muscular & tough looking!  Bridget Burke   Mar-11-05 10:36 AM   #19 
  - they handcuffed a 92 YEAR OLD TEXAS woman  seabeyond   Mar-11-05 10:41 AM   #27 
  - of course there is now call for it, but long ago  seabeyond   Mar-11-05 10:40 AM   #26 
  - In TX driving on a expired license is and arrest -able offense.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 11:18 AM   #53 
  - ya ya ya 7 year old ticket, paid on twice i owe $46 but.......  seabeyond   Mar-11-05 10:33 AM   #16 
  - Why  Dittoz   Mar-11-05 10:44 AM   #30 
     - i see it more of an inditement on our society  seabeyond   Mar-11-05 10:55 AM   #39 
        - Great points.  Dittoz   Mar-11-05 11:05 AM   #45 
           - Not the police........................i cant do that  seabeyond   Mar-11-05 11:15 AM   #51 
  - Not a good time to be married to a comedian...  GloriaSmith   Mar-11-05 10:39 AM   #23 
  - This is not an example of a conspiracy or harrassment based on politics...  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 10:51 AM   #35 
  - Just curious  stanwyck   Mar-11-05 10:52 AM   #36 
  - Don't forget the other 2 times bush was arrested. (one theft and one DP)  LynnTheDem   Mar-11-05 10:57 AM   #40 
  - I don't know. Can you provide me a link that says he was or wasn't?  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 10:59 AM   #41 
  - the records were scrubbed  stanwyck   Mar-11-05 11:50 AM   #80 
  - What cop automatically knows who Tracey McShane is?  GloriaSmith   Mar-11-05 11:08 AM   #46 
  - that's right. it's procedure here  ThirdWheelDC   Mar-11-05 11:59 AM   #88 
  - At least they didn't tazer here  alarimer   Mar-11-05 11:10 AM   #47 
  - Unfreaking believeable!  kerry-is-my-prez   Mar-11-05 11:28 AM   #60 
  - i just think it's ridiculous that you can be arrested for this  qanda   Mar-11-05 11:29 AM   #62 
  - If you already driving on a suspended.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 11:35 AM   #68 
  - Well...  rinsd   Mar-11-05 11:35 AM   #69 
  - I'll bet that tickets paid now.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 11:38 AM   #75 
  - Yes...  rinsd   Mar-11-05 11:40 AM   #77 
  - The ticket was paid  bloom   Mar-11-05 11:56 AM   #85 
  - It seems the suspension was related to failure to pay a ticket.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 11:49 AM   #79 
     - Yup....  rinsd   Mar-11-05 12:11 PM   #96 
  - I agree  Radical Activist   Mar-11-05 11:37 AM   #73 
  - i can't help but be a little amused  Blue_Tires   Mar-11-05 11:29 AM   #63 
  - I was thinking the same thing  tinonedown   Mar-11-05 11:55 AM   #84 
     - Would Limbaugh's wife or Hannity's wife get the same treatment?  classicfilmfan   Mar-11-05 12:16 PM   #97 
        - Excellent question  tinonedown   Mar-11-05 12:36 PM   #102 
        - Um, yes, they would.  SeveneightyWhoa   Mar-11-05 12:38 PM   #104 
           - I was responding to the "good the rich are getting screwed"  classicfilmfan   Mar-11-05 01:18 PM   #120 
              - I read Will Pitt's posts...  tx_dem41   Mar-11-05 01:21 PM   #122 
  - Curious to see  concord   Mar-11-05 11:33 AM   #65 
  - The decision to arrest....  bvar22   Mar-11-05 11:38 AM   #74 
  - Not all departments have computers.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 11:51 AM   #81 
     - Only a matter of time.  bvar22   Mar-11-05 12:08 PM   #94 
  - That's the exact same thing that happens in Florida  ThirdWheelDC   Mar-11-05 11:58 AM   #86 
  - NY police  LibertyLover   Mar-11-05 12:21 PM   #98 
  - Lucky she wasn't in Calif. They may have tried to take her DNA...  Sugarbleus   Mar-11-05 12:33 PM   #101 
  - My gawd, she's a criminal mastermind!!!!  devilgrrl   Mar-11-05 12:46 PM   #106 
  - John Stewart.  palme   Mar-11-05 12:50 PM   #107 
  - for clarity sake, she wasnt speeding, implied didnt break law  seabeyond   Mar-11-05 12:53 PM   #108 
  - Read again.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 01:06 PM   #111 
     - Yes, it could be any number of things. Why couldn't the police state...  Media_Lies_Daily   Mar-11-05 02:22 PM   #187 
     - You would need to pull the incident report to find out.  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 02:42 PM   #196 
     - she wasnt speeding though  seabeyond   Mar-11-05 03:39 PM   #202 
        - "she wasn't speeding though"  TX-RAT   Mar-11-05 04:11 PM   #205 
           - oh i got it rat  seabeyond   Mar-11-05 04:16 PM   #206 
  - Could be harrasment by *.  PROGRESSIVE1   Mar-11-05 01:58 PM   #162 
  - I know one thing, this better not shut up Jon Stewart.  cat_girl25   Mar-11-05 02:17 PM   #180 
  - Unfortunately, it will cause him to think twi...and that's what they want.  Media_Lies_Daily   Mar-11-05 02:23 PM   #188 
     - That's the goal to intimidate. But it could be Stewart's trump card.  shance   Mar-11-05 02:44 PM   #197 
     - Good grief  Mz Pip   Mar-11-05 02:50 PM   #198 
        - I just love how people try and denigrate and gloss over abuse of authority  shance   Mar-11-05 03:26 PM   #200 
  - Handcuffed for traffic offenses where there was no injury or damage?  Cleita   Mar-11-05 02:41 PM   #195 
  - Great point. Without any provocation, its abuse.  shance   Mar-11-05 03:10 PM   #199 
  - She and my 9th grader have something in common now.  Blue in Portland   Mar-11-05 03:47 PM   #203 
  - That is a little odd. You handcuff people for driving with an expired  applegrove   Mar-11-05 04:17 PM   #207 
  - As has been pointed out, the license was suspended.  rinsd   Mar-11-05 04:42 PM   #211 
  - This is disgusting.  Generic Guy   Mar-11-05 04:21 PM   #208 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC