You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #194: Really? you don't seem like you have good feelings [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #181
194. Really? you don't seem like you have good feelings
you seem kind of angry. Are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Wellstone assassination technology revealed Must_B_Free  Mar-01-05 12:18 PM   #0 
  - Sweet sufferin' Jesus on a pogo stick!  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 12:22 PM   #1 
  - Glad you said it...  no name no slogan   Mar-01-05 12:44 PM   #3 
  - Good God  Trailrider1951   Mar-01-05 12:44 PM   #2 
  - or their pacemaker, for example?  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 12:48 PM   #4 
  - Good questions! Let's ask someone with a pacemaker  No Exit   Mar-01-05 01:22 PM   #13 
     - All of the above...  KansDem   Mar-01-05 03:44 PM   #47 
     - Heh heh... you get an "A" for answering the question right!  No Exit   Mar-02-05 07:07 AM   #224 
     - Cheney?  liberalla   Mar-02-05 03:20 AM   #217 
        - *Gasp!*  No Exit   Mar-02-05 07:08 AM   #225 
  - You can already do that with, essentially,  Redstone   Mar-01-05 12:52 PM   #5 
  - As I said at the time - Wellstone died a year after the Pentagon demo'd  papau   Mar-01-05 12:58 PM   #6 
  - My sister (who is a teacher) and is a mathematical whiz . . .  frankly_fedup2   Mar-01-05 02:31 PM   #28 
  - you cannot control the weather with anything  FourStarDemocrat   Mar-01-05 03:25 PM   #36 
  - Weather as a Force Multiplier:Owning the Weather in 2025  seemslikeadream   Mar-01-05 03:33 PM   #41 
  - I'm just the messenger. My sister is not the conspiracy, government ...  frankly_fedup2   Mar-01-05 04:47 PM   #59 
  - The problem is that weather is a highly nonlinear system  AZCat   Mar-01-05 04:53 PM   #61 
     - Oh no, I didn't mean to imply worldwide. She never stated that. . .  frankly_fedup2   Mar-01-05 06:13 PM   #127 
  - Au contraire  bling bling   Mar-01-05 07:51 PM   #184 
  - Never say never... n/t  Starlight   Mar-01-05 11:47 PM   #214 
     - I didn't say never...I said not at this point..  FourStarDemocrat   Mar-02-05 05:02 AM   #219 
        - So you believe you are privy to all the latest government research?  Starlight   Mar-02-05 07:38 AM   #226 
           - I never said that I know everything..  FourStarDemocrat   Mar-02-05 06:22 PM   #247 
  - Doppler heart tests use sound waves  AngryAmish   Mar-01-05 04:20 PM   #55 
  - A Doppler test  Dave Reynolds   Mar-01-05 05:33 PM   #87 
  - "Scoff if you must".... why thanks, I will. She is full of it. n/t  Wrinkle_In_Time   Mar-01-05 08:50 PM   #196 
  - Love your avatar!  cat_girl25   Mar-01-05 10:46 PM   #205 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-02-05 06:27 AM   #223 
  - it's possible to retrofit engines with non-CPU ignition/fuel systems  ngant17   Mar-01-05 07:49 PM   #182 
  - Oh, puh-LEEZE!  Padraig18   Mar-01-05 01:01 PM   #7 
  - Oh I guess you're right...  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 01:07 PM   #9 
  - You bear the burden of proof here, Must_B_Free  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 01:19 PM   #11 
  - how was he  Dookus   Mar-01-05 01:20 PM   #12 
  - Wellstone carried the mantle for liberalism and populism -  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 03:02 PM   #33 
     - in some cases, yes  Dookus   Mar-01-05 04:52 PM   #60 
        - The loss of a Dem senator gave Repubs a majority-control of the Senate.  chelaque liberal   Mar-01-05 05:08 PM   #65 
           - It was not a foregone conclusion  Dookus   Mar-01-05 05:09 PM   #66 
           - The timing (10 days before the election?) made it virtually impossible  chelaque liberal   Mar-01-05 05:25 PM   #74 
              - I don't understand  Dookus   Mar-01-05 05:29 PM   #82 
                 - Virtually impossible to develop a campaign.  chelaque liberal   Mar-01-05 05:33 PM   #85 
                    - ok...  Dookus   Mar-01-05 05:35 PM   #88 
                    - The BS about the funeral hurt....  rinsd   Mar-01-05 06:14 PM   #129 
                    - and I think it's  Dookus   Mar-01-05 06:35 PM   #134 
                       - Okay, my computer is sprayed now!  Devlzown   Mar-01-05 09:46 PM   #202 
                    - Maybe it is just my gut feeling. Maybe that gut feeling comes  chelaque liberal   Mar-02-05 08:29 AM   #228 
                       - While capable of great evil, I don't think they're all-powerful.  Illinois_Dem   Mar-02-05 10:25 AM   #237 
                    - It was also impossible for a lot of the people who voted absentee  dflprincess   Mar-01-05 10:54 PM   #207 
           - As you said  fujiyama   Mar-02-05 04:20 AM   #218 
  - The plane crash was not 'unexplained'.  Padraig18   Mar-01-05 01:30 PM   #15 
  - padraig18- of all the "conspiracies" this one seems preety real  natrat   Mar-01-05 03:47 PM   #50 
  - Because you are mistaking an open mind for an uncritical mind. EOM  K-W   Mar-01-05 06:09 PM   #121 
  - That's what he said.  igil   Mar-01-05 04:56 PM   #62 
  - and after being personally threatened by Darth Cheney  burythehatchet   Mar-01-05 03:41 PM   #43 
  - It may not be a coincidence,  Goldmund   Mar-01-05 07:09 PM   #155 
  - Thank you, Sir Padraig,  Redstone   Mar-01-05 03:22 PM   #35 
  - Embrace The Tinfoil  dbt   Mar-01-05 01:02 PM   #8 
  - It's actually a conspiracy.  igil   Mar-01-05 04:58 PM   #63 
     - Aluminum is baaaaad. I thought too much "aluminum" exposure . . .  frankly_fedup2   Mar-01-05 08:35 PM   #189 
        - Ah, for the days when tinfoil was made of tin. n/t  igil   Mar-02-05 01:02 PM   #244 
  - The flip side of this story is  Sinistrous   Mar-01-05 01:16 PM   #10 
  - Let me lay a little more realistic theory on you  BillyDoc   Mar-01-05 01:27 PM   #14 
  - Amen to that  nolabels   Mar-01-05 02:32 PM   #29 
  - Not even tinfoil...just plain wrong  Jakey   Mar-01-05 03:11 PM   #34 
     - And history gets re-written again  BillyDoc   Mar-01-05 03:43 PM   #45 
        - I beg to differ sir...  Jakey   Mar-01-05 04:05 PM   #53 
           - So, OK, you're saying that  BillyDoc   Mar-01-05 04:47 PM   #58 
              - Almost there...  Jakey   Mar-01-05 05:46 PM   #100 
                 - No, no, no, no  Eloriel   Mar-01-05 06:58 PM   #148 
                    - Sorry but...  Jakey   Mar-01-05 07:33 PM   #175 
                       - Here's something that doesn't jive  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 10:23 PM   #203 
                          - "Special VFR"  Jakey   Mar-01-05 11:25 PM   #212 
  - 2 hypotheses are equally possible & reasonable  JackRiddler   Mar-01-05 01:44 PM   #16 
  - Except for one SMALL detail---- the NTSB investigation  Padraig18   Mar-01-05 01:46 PM   #17 
     - Yuck! The NTSB? Cover Up Central? Hee hee!  RBHam   Mar-01-05 01:53 PM   #18 
     - I've checked it out before.  Padraig18   Mar-01-05 01:55 PM   #19 
        - Professor James Fetzer  RBHam   Mar-01-05 01:58 PM   #20 
        - I used to be a member of his Yahoo group.  Padraig18   Mar-01-05 02:01 PM   #22 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-01-05 02:08 PM   #23 
              - You know what, RBHam? People died in plane crashes long before the BFEE  Padraig18   Mar-01-05 02:11 PM   #24 
                 - You don't get e-v-i-d-e-n-c-e  Eloriel   Mar-01-05 06:25 PM   #131 
        - You're right, but you forget:  T Town Jake   Mar-02-05 05:35 AM   #221 
           - Yea, and Iraq has WMD's  nolabels   Mar-02-05 09:37 AM   #232 
     - Did the NTSB investigation consider both hypotheses?  JackRiddler   Mar-01-05 02:14 PM   #25 
     - Have you read their report?  Padraig18   Mar-01-05 02:17 PM   #26 
        - If you look for the answer they feed you, you'll accept anything they say  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 03:32 PM   #40 
           - Once again, the better question is this:  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 03:49 PM   #51 
              - They failed to address any "unfriendly" circumstances  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 05:21 PM   #71 
                 - It's not a canard.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:29 PM   #81 
                    - Ok then by that logic,  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 05:44 PM   #98 
                       - Once again, Must_B_Free, YOU bear the burden of proof here.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:47 PM   #101 
                          - I am having difficulty understanding "Burden of Proof"  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 05:52 PM   #105 
                             - YOU are the one challenging their conclusions.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:58 PM   #108 
                                - As I said before, I am in agreement with all of their facts  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 06:04 PM   #114 
                                   - Point blank answer.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:06 PM   #117 
                                      - You are throwing some burden of proof on me, yet none on the NTSB  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 06:09 PM   #120 
                                         - No, wrong answer.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:11 PM   #124 
                                            - No it doesn't  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 06:48 PM   #143 
                                               - And your specualtion is more informed than the NTSB?  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:52 PM   #145 
                                                  - Thanks for playing, you just lost your case.  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 06:59 PM   #150 
                                                  - Thanks for playing, but I won.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 07:04 PM   #151 
                                                  - all you did was call names  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 07:08 PM   #154 
                                                  - Again, what about 'burden of proof' did I not make clear?  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 07:10 PM   #156 
                                                  - I think I successfully made the point that  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 07:15 PM   #159 
                                                  - I disagree with that statement.  AZCat   Mar-01-05 07:17 PM   #161 
                                                  - Indeed I do disgaree.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 07:19 PM   #164 
                                                  - challenging the physical evidence  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 07:30 PM   #172 
                                                  - This is really pointless, just like arguing with a stump would be.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 07:32 PM   #174 
                                                  - If you won then what did you win?  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 07:43 PM   #179 
                                                  - I won the good feeling I always get when I expose BS conspiracy theories  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 07:48 PM   #181 
                                                  - Really? you don't seem like you have good feelings  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 08:43 PM   #194 
     - Explained by the MSM! Wasn't it? Of course we must believe them!  Catamount   Mar-01-05 03:27 PM   #37 
     - The NTSB is not the MSM. n/t  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 03:29 PM   #39 
     - Padraig? What is the zealous attack against those looking at the case?  shance   Mar-01-05 05:42 PM   #96 
     - The NTSB said the Carnahan crash was "pilot error"  dflprincess   Mar-01-05 11:10 PM   #208 
  - AMERICAN ASSASSINATION: THE STRANGE DEATH OF PAUL WELLSTONE  seemslikeadream   Mar-01-05 02:01 PM   #21 
  - I highly recommend this book!  Starlight   Mar-02-05 02:50 AM   #216 
  - In a book describing the MiG25, I remember a passage  realpolitik   Mar-01-05 02:26 PM   #27 
  - But the NTSB would NEVER conceal the truth!  seemslikeadream   Mar-01-05 02:32 PM   #30 
  - I started this really lonely battle with good friend Senator Wellstone  seemslikeadream   Mar-01-05 02:50 PM   #31 
  - White House budget office thwarts EPA warning on asbestos-laced insulation  seemslikeadream   Mar-01-05 02:54 PM   #32 
  - There are no "chips" or electronics of any kind in the control surface  karlrschneider   Mar-01-05 03:29 PM   #38 
  - How dare you throw facts in the way of a perfectly good crank theory!  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 03:34 PM   #42 
  - You're now going to have to bring some facts  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 03:44 PM   #46 
     - Why should I have to?  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 03:45 PM   #48 
        - "Why should I have to?"  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 05:37 PM   #90 
           - Why don't you provide some evidence to back up your theory?  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:39 PM   #92 
              - All you've done is cite a report without citing an iota of its content.  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 05:48 PM   #102 
                 - Is there something about 'burden of proof' that I've failed to make clear?  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:51 PM   #104 
                    - I am asking you to show me where the Burden was Proven by NTSB  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 05:55 PM   #106 
                    - It's in their final report.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:59 PM   #109 
                       - So you can't articulate it then?  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 06:05 PM   #115 
                          - I don't play 'gotcha', Must_B_Free.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:08 PM   #119 
                             - No - the burden is on the NTSB to prove that their assertion is correct.  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 06:10 PM   #123 
                                - No.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:12 PM   #126 
                                   - No they didn't  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 06:33 PM   #133 
                                      - I'm not playing this bullshit game any more.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:35 PM   #135 
                                         - You never did play it  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 06:55 PM   #147 
                                            - And I'm supposed to accept your specualtion?  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:58 PM   #149 
                                               - you're only ridiculing yourself now...  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 07:04 PM   #152 
                                               - Sorry.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 07:06 PM   #153 
                                               - with name calling?  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 07:11 PM   #157 
                                               - No, by calling your posts rank speculation, which they are.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 07:14 PM   #158 
                                               - perhaps you need some context to better understand  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 07:23 PM   #167 
                                               - No, I dislike your theory because...  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 07:25 PM   #169 
                                               - But to do that would be to do you a disservice  AZCat   Mar-01-05 07:28 PM   #171 
                                               - I did read the report  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 07:50 PM   #183 
                                               - That's why they call it "probable cause"  AZCat   Mar-01-05 07:58 PM   #186 
                                               - Ok - Now it's "Probable" Cause?  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 08:52 PM   #197 
                                               - Please don't conflate posters  AZCat   Mar-01-05 09:00 PM   #199 
                    - Sorry, C_L  Eloriel   Mar-01-05 07:18 PM   #163 
                       - What's lacking in their report, Eloriel?  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 07:22 PM   #166 
                          - CL - their report speculates that the pilots caused the crash  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 08:08 PM   #188 
                             - I just want to say that I agree with your position  DemonFighterLives   Mar-01-05 10:53 PM   #206 
  - All it has to do is interfere with operation  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 03:43 PM   #44 
     - They suffered from a low-speed stall.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 03:46 PM   #49 
     - i dont think it has anything to do with "controll surfaces"  natrat   Mar-01-05 03:55 PM   #52 
     - It doesn't have electronic ignition  TrogL   Mar-01-05 05:02 PM   #64 
     - Have you ever been to northern Minnesota?  no name no slogan   Mar-01-05 04:12 PM   #54 
        - If you are blocking the truth because of your own denial, you should be  shance   Mar-01-05 05:15 PM   #67 
        - The assumption that 'the truth' has not been found is what's shameful.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:17 PM   #68 
        - Wow Cuban I SURE am glad you have the copyright on the truth here!!  shance   Mar-01-05 05:22 PM   #72 
           - Straw man.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:23 PM   #73 
              - Straw man??  shance   Mar-01-05 05:27 PM   #77 
              - If you'll look upthread, you'll find a link to the NTSB's report. n/t  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:30 PM   #83 
              - In what way is the NTSB's report  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 05:28 PM   #79 
                 - It doesn't work that way.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:31 PM   #84 
                    - What doesn't work that way?  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 05:39 PM   #91 
                       - The burden of proof.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:40 PM   #93 
                          - WHAT HARD EVIDENCE???? There IS no hard evidence.  shance   Mar-01-05 05:46 PM   #99 
                             - Oh yes there is.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:48 PM   #103 
                                - Go ahead and list one piece of all this HARD evidence  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 05:56 PM   #107 
                                   - Show us one piece of evidence that suports YOUR theory.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:00 PM   #112 
                                      - So how do I have a burden of proof when the NTSB dosn't?  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 06:07 PM   #118 
                                         - Yes, you do.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:09 PM   #122 
                                            - Here's my first piece of evidence:  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 06:12 PM   #125 
                                               - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-01-05 06:13 PM   #128 
        - Who's blocking the truth?  no name no slogan   Mar-01-05 06:38 PM   #139 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-01-05 07:17 PM   #162 
        - Thank you. I think that y'all that insist in conspiracy re: Wellstone's  latteromden   Mar-01-05 08:36 PM   #190 
        - I'm in MN  DemonFighterLives   Mar-01-05 10:43 PM   #204 
  - I think Bush and his pals are just....  chrisbur   Mar-01-05 04:20 PM   #56 
  - Yes, and their amazing luck  Eloriel   Mar-01-05 07:31 PM   #173 
     - That is my burden of proof.  Sterling   Mar-01-05 07:59 PM   #187 
        - I guess I'm just making trouble.  chrisbur   Mar-01-05 08:39 PM   #192 
  - Politicians who died in airplane crashes: link  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 04:27 PM   #57 
  - What is your point?  shance   Mar-01-05 05:20 PM   #69 
     - I'm saying that there's no proof that ANYONE was ever 'targeted'  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:26 PM   #75 
     - He doesn't have a point  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 05:26 PM   #76 
        - I have evidence, Must_B_Free  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:28 PM   #78 
           - Go ahead - we're still waiting for you to prove something, anything  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 05:29 PM   #80 
              - Sorry, but it doesn't work that way.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:33 PM   #86 
                 - How about I characterize my position and you character yours.  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 05:42 PM   #95 
                 - How about you provide something resembling proof.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:43 PM   #97 
                    - Where did I ever say I had proven anything?  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 05:59 PM   #110 
                       - The rules of logic dictate that you must.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:02 PM   #113 
                          - My evidence is that the NTSB didn't prove their assertion.  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 06:36 PM   #137 
                             - That's NOT evidence.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:38 PM   #138 
                                - law school?  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 06:51 PM   #144 
                                   - I anyone's made a fool of themselves, I can assure you it's not me.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:54 PM   #146 
                                      - more name calling  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 07:16 PM   #160 
                                         - It seems to be as much as you've posted.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 07:24 PM   #168 
                                            - A wink is as good as a nod to a blind horse  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 08:48 PM   #195 
                 - Wellstone was Definitely Targeted  chlamor   Mar-01-05 06:06 PM   #116 
                    - Politicians who died in air crashes  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:15 PM   #130 
                       - Not all plane crashes are alike  chlamor   Mar-01-05 06:33 PM   #132 
                          - "...it would be foolish for us to discount conspiracy ...."  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:36 PM   #136 
                             - Did the NTSB consider foul play?  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 08:42 PM   #193 
  - OK, until today I gave odds of 30% that Wellston was assassinated  IanDB1   Mar-01-05 05:20 PM   #70 
  - So, if the sight conditions forced an instrument landing  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 05:35 PM   #89 
  - 'woulda, coulda, shoulda'  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 05:41 PM   #94 
     - So, speculation is OK coming from the NTSB, but not from me?  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 06:39 PM   #140 
        - For the same reason...  AZCat   Mar-01-05 06:41 PM   #141 
        - How about speculation by a political doctor on a political issue?  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 07:34 PM   #176 
           - No, I wouldn't call it 'dubiously absent' at all.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 07:38 PM   #178 
           - I think the analogy falls apart there  AZCat   Mar-01-05 07:46 PM   #180 
        - No, I don't accept it from you.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 06:43 PM   #142 
           - logical flaw in your position  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 07:28 PM   #170 
              - Not a logical flaw.  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-01-05 07:35 PM   #177 
                 - I thought you were done talking to me  Must_B_Free   Mar-01-05 08:38 PM   #191 
                 - Cuban, you're exactly right (and have been throughout this thread), but...  T Town Jake   Mar-02-05 05:50 AM   #222 
                    - Sure glad you cleared it all up  DemonFighterLives   Mar-02-05 09:00 AM   #229 
                    - What an insightful quote!  Illinois_Dem   Mar-02-05 09:47 AM   #233 
  - Oops  ryan_cats   Mar-01-05 06:00 PM   #111 
  - There was one initial statement by the NTSB that has never been  DemocracyInaction   Mar-01-05 07:19 PM   #165 
  - Carmody's actual quote was...  Jakey   Mar-01-05 07:56 PM   #185 
     - I don't remember the exact details nor did I see the site  DemonFighterLives   Mar-01-05 11:17 PM   #209 
  - ...and the Inverse Square Law rolls its eyes.  Wrinkle_In_Time   Mar-01-05 08:58 PM   #198 
  - Folks, look at ways to fuck up an autolanding system  jmowreader   Mar-01-05 09:36 PM   #200 
  - DemoTex will know better than me, but...  AZCat   Mar-01-05 09:44 PM   #201 
     - OK, I'm more skeptical now than I was before. Count me at 31%  IanDB1   Mar-01-05 11:19 PM   #211 
     - There's nothing wrong with questioning an explanation  AZCat   Mar-01-05 11:38 PM   #213 
     - And a King Air uses mechanical flight-surface controls  jmowreader   Mar-02-05 08:19 AM   #227 
        - "What Would Wellstone Do" indeed  no name no slogan   Mar-02-05 09:15 AM   #230 
        - I don't understand why people NEED for this to be an assasination.  Illinois_Dem   Mar-02-05 10:02 AM   #234 
        - I know why  jmowreader   Mar-02-05 07:08 PM   #249 
        - Wellstone's change in travel plans was somewhat spur of the moment  dflprincess   Mar-02-05 08:13 PM   #251 
  - This has been around for decades. It's an EMP weapon.  porkrind   Mar-01-05 11:19 PM   #210 
  - EMP weapons are huge, clumsy messy things (even the non-nuclear ones)  IanDB1   Mar-01-05 11:52 PM   #215 
     - unless technology has advanced  rman   Mar-02-05 05:09 AM   #220 
  - Finally, a post I know a great deal about!  Illinois_Dem   Mar-02-05 09:26 AM   #231 
  - Thanks for your informative post  AZCat   Mar-02-05 10:09 AM   #235 
  - Thanks!  Illinois_Dem   Mar-02-05 10:13 AM   #236 
  - BEAUTIFUL post!  Padraig18   Mar-02-05 10:37 AM   #238 
  - Thank you!  Illinois_Dem   Mar-02-05 10:46 AM   #239 
     - PS  Padraig18   Mar-02-05 11:21 AM   #240 
        - That's very kind of you to say.  Illinois_Dem   Mar-02-05 02:57 PM   #245 
  - Hopping on the bandwagon...  no name no slogan   Mar-02-05 12:11 PM   #242 
  - I'm sorry for your loss.  Illinois_Dem   Mar-02-05 12:16 PM   #243 
  - Fantastic post!  Cuban_Liberal   Mar-02-05 05:39 PM   #246 
  - I'm gonna kick this for you.  Padraig18   Mar-02-05 06:53 PM   #248 
  - In the interest of accuracy...  Jakey   Mar-02-05 07:08 PM   #250 
  - Great post  fujiyama   Mar-03-05 02:44 AM   #252 
  - Fer Chrissakes, if you wanted to take down a single-engine plane,  Lone Pawn   Mar-02-05 11:27 AM   #241 
  - Odd it 'tis...  T Town Jake   Mar-03-05 09:22 AM   #253 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC