You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: Yes, very compelling indeed. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
phishhead Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, very compelling indeed.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Why should we vote for someone that authorized Bush to get his War on? unfrigginreal  Sep-10-03 11:39 PM   #0 
  - to get rid of Bush  Cocoa   Sep-10-03 11:41 PM   #1 
  - Yes, very compelling indeed.  phishhead   Sep-10-03 11:47 PM   #3 
  - I would vote for a pro-UN candidate...  Dr Fate   Sep-10-03 11:45 PM   #2 
  - I would vote for a blemish on your ass before I'd do anything to get  nothingshocksmeanymore   Sep-10-03 11:47 PM   #4 
  - I sorta liked .....  Booberdawg   Sep-10-03 11:56 PM   #11 
  - must be hard-fought  Terwilliger   Sep-11-03 12:01 AM   #13 
  - Wow...Ms NSMA...how harsh, I'm shocked :o)  unfrigginreal   Sep-11-03 12:05 AM   #14 
     - No not necessarily. I have always loved Senator Graham  nothingshocksmeanymore   Sep-11-03 12:22 AM   #17 
  - I refuse to vote for anyone who backed Bush  niceypoo   Sep-10-03 11:49 PM   #5 
  - Yeah- the real Bush is a much better option...  Dr Fate   Sep-10-03 11:51 PM   #7 
  - i'm not trying to change anyone's mind  disgruntella   Sep-10-03 11:51 PM   #6 
  - It's foolish to consider only one issue  Booberdawg   Sep-10-03 11:52 PM   #8 
  - just stop thinking and vote dem, dammit!  KG   Sep-10-03 11:53 PM   #9 
  - If you've been reading DU  dmr   Sep-10-03 11:55 PM   #10 
  - I won't vote for them, I will hold them accountable  lcordero   Sep-10-03 11:58 PM   #12 
  - BTW...I refuse to exchange one crook for another crook  lcordero   Sep-11-03 12:09 AM   #15 
  - "draft-age block" has more at stake. They would insist on electability.  oasis   Sep-11-03 02:58 AM   #21 
     - The draft-age block have been shitted on by both parties at every turn  lcordero   Sep-11-03 03:51 AM   #23 
  - We shouldn't.  RichM   Sep-11-03 12:10 AM   #16 
  - I'm with you  cprise   Sep-11-03 02:14 AM   #18 
  - If Edwards is nominated, you won't vote for him in the general election?  PurityOfEssence   Sep-11-03 02:23 AM   #19 
     - They don't have to think that far ahead yet...  unfrigginreal   Sep-11-03 02:29 AM   #20 
  - To be fair  Rooktoven   Sep-11-03 03:03 AM   #22 
  - shrubbo* has a history of screwing things up  lcordero   Sep-11-03 04:02 AM   #24 
  - We shouldn't  leftyandproud   Sep-11-03 05:47 AM   #25 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC