You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: NOT THE 10-06-03 ARTICLE - A LATER GANNON RECOLLECTION [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. NOT THE 10-06-03 ARTICLE - A LATER GANNON RECOLLECTION
How does one say this - I don't think there's evidence here to refute Gannon's alibi. Was never able to find Gannon's 10/06/03 article. Looked again at the DailyKos Timelime (several postings above) which contains an extract that does not make reference to any classified materials. The account immediately above is not the 10/06 article, but is instead a later (undated) recollection by Gannon. The Blogger's commentary is very misleading.

Gannon could very well have learned what he knew from 10/17/03 WSJ article prior to his inverview with Wilson.

This doesn't mean that someone didn't share classified materials with Gannon, but there just isnt sufficient evidence to support that charge based on the above materials. My apologies to Kurtz on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -WP Kurtz: Gannon told FBI never had secret memo - read it in WSJ leveymg  Feb-20-05 07:25 AM   #0 
  - Well, that settles it. Could anyone not believe all this dude says?  Racenut20   Feb-20-05 07:29 AM   #1 
  - I know, how can we question his honesty now?  NewJeffCT   Feb-20-05 09:41 AM   #9 
  - Which still leaves the question...  prodigal_green   Feb-20-05 07:31 AM   #2 
  - but they did know about his tax lien  cap   Feb-20-05 07:32 AM   #3 
  - This is what Digby has to say about that...  trumad   Feb-20-05 07:53 AM   #4 
  - You've done a very nice job of isolating the suspect language.  BuyingThyme   Feb-20-05 08:33 AM   #5 
  - Speaking of suspect language  kgfnally   Feb-20-05 09:44 AM   #10 
  - Gannon's retelling seems to be a lawyer's account  leveymg   Feb-20-05 08:41 AM   #6 
  - two great timelines of gannon and the valerie plame leak  flyarm   Feb-20-05 11:37 AM   #19 
  - some good gannon links!!!  flyarm   Feb-20-05 11:42 AM   #20 
  - Cached articles by jeff gannon. about joe wilson..from talon  flyarm   Feb-20-05 12:01 PM   #21 
  - He saw the memo...it's clear by his nondenial and "journalistic privilege"  dpbrown   Feb-20-05 11:13 AM   #17 
  - Contrast This Transcript With Cooper's From Friday  KharmaTrain   Feb-20-05 11:28 AM   #18 
  - Does anyone have the WSJ story and Gannon's report?  leveymg   Feb-20-05 09:04 AM   #7 
  - Dec. 2003 WP story touches on Talon (Gannon?), referenced INR doc,  leveymg   Feb-20-05 10:11 AM   #11 
  - Here's the Oct 17 2003 WSJ Article - thanks Cryptome  leveymg   Feb-20-05 10:27 AM   #12 
  - sounds like someone has been reading DU  bpilgrim   Feb-20-05 09:39 AM   #8 
  - Billy, the point is that Gannon may have seen or cited a leaked NRI doc  leveymg   Feb-20-05 05:13 PM   #23 
  - Gannon's Oct 6. 03 report link below - Kurtz conveyed Gannon lie?!  leveymg   Feb-20-05 10:38 AM   #13 
  - GOPUSA link scrubbed - ANYONE HAVE GANNON 10-06 REPORT?  leveymg   Feb-20-05 11:08 AM   #15 
  - Kurtz is really trying to bury this story, what is he so afraid of?  Spazito   Feb-20-05 10:44 AM   #14 
  - WE HAVE KURTZ NAILED - STILL NEED GANNON'S 10-06-03 REPORT, ANYONE?  leveymg   Feb-20-05 11:11 AM   #16 
     - Found this that seems to quote Gannon's 10-06-03  leveymg   Feb-20-05 05:05 PM   #22 
        - NOT THE 10-06-03 ARTICLE - A LATER GANNON RECOLLECTION  leveymg   Feb-21-05 09:54 AM   #24 
           - That is the crux of the matter.  BurtWorm   Feb-22-05 11:14 AM   #25 
  - Kurtz dives headlong into the Gannon story,investigative journalism lives.  oasis   Feb-22-05 11:19 AM   #26 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC