You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #42: No kidding sherlock [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Spacejet Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. No kidding sherlock
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 08:24 PM by Spacejet
So WHY wasn't the original post "why was a non-credited 'reporter' using a false name working for...".

INSTEAD of "why was a gay man allowed near the president".

Got an answer?

What if the OP read

"For all those who are blowing this story off as no biggie, ask yourself this.... How did a black prostitute end up asking the President of the United States questions in the White House?..... Most importantly, how did a black Prostitute end up with top secret classified documents? "

Or would it still be ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC