You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #11: you would have to have armed force to do what you suggest [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. you would have to have armed force to do what you suggest
in paragraph one...and it isn't about is about plotting insurrection online. That is why I posted my previous response. You say you aren't advocating firing shots and so forth??? Try seizing members of the administration (who are citizens whether we like it or not) without doing just that. How would you 'arrange' detainment of our officials??? I would like to see that...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Hypothetical.... what if??? firebee  Dec-16-04 11:53 AM   #0 
  - I don't know. Why not do it and see?  Vincardog   Dec-16-04 11:56 AM   #1 
  - um...while the hypothetical is interesting  ProdigalJunkMail   Dec-16-04 11:56 AM   #2 
  - Yep  bryant69   Dec-16-04 11:59 AM   #7 
     - Well, I wasn't talkin about taking arms up against citizens.  firebee   Dec-16-04 12:45 PM   #9 
        - you would have to have armed force to do what you suggest  ProdigalJunkMail   Dec-16-04 12:49 PM   #11 
           - Plotting????  firebee   Dec-16-04 01:15 PM   #14 
              - asking people 'what would you do?' can easily be seen as plotting  ProdigalJunkMail   Dec-16-04 01:22 PM   #15 
  - I Would Never Agree to Do Something by "Any Means Necessary"  ribofunk   Dec-16-04 11:57 AM   #3 
  - what do you mean by : "take it upon yourself "?.....I would be careful  ElsewheresDaughter   Dec-16-04 11:57 AM   #4 
  - RE: Hypothetical.... what if???"  BDG   Dec-16-04 11:57 AM   #5 
  - I've been saying this over and over.  Cleita   Dec-16-04 11:57 AM   #6 
  - US would veto Security Council resolution  Racenut20   Dec-16-04 12:01 PM   #8 
  - I believe the U.S. had it's "veto" authority taken away last year.  firebee   Dec-16-04 12:46 PM   #10 
     - a permanent member of the security council  ProdigalJunkMail   Dec-16-04 12:51 PM   #12 
     - No, they didn't.  420inTN   Dec-16-04 12:55 PM   #13 
  - This is dumb  I Miss Bubba   Dec-16-04 01:48 PM   #16 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC