You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #106: I think you need to read it again [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #93
106. I think you need to read it again
Edited on Wed Dec-15-04 05:28 PM by wyldwolf
the paranoid part is that there are "plants on DU," the rest of his post is predicated on that paranoia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Censorship on the left. KlatooBNikto  Dec-14-04 06:14 AM   #0 
  - how is this censorship?  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 06:18 AM   #1 
  - I would just remove them from the Democratic Party.Let them become the  KlatooBNikto   Dec-14-04 06:22 AM   #3 
  - that is your opinion and, by your definition, it is censorship  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 06:23 AM   #4 
  - Al From is in a position of "Leadership" within the Dem Party. I am not.  KlatooBNikto   Dec-14-04 06:28 AM   #9 
     - Not really  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 06:34 AM   #14 
        - Moron chairs an oxymoron  PATRICK   Dec-15-04 09:54 AM   #96 
  - Exactly ! I live among republicans and have a few friends and  ElectroPrincess   Dec-14-04 06:48 AM   #26 
  - the poster is merely not taking the attack sitting down  xchrom   Dec-14-04 06:27 AM   #8 
  - he should frame it as such, then  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 06:31 AM   #11 
  - "no one from our side should be allowed"  tsuki   Dec-14-04 06:35 AM   #15 
  - I believe you should be replying to the original poster and not me...  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 06:38 AM   #18 
  - Sorry, did not mean to offend. I just logged on this afternoon and saw  tsuki   Dec-14-04 05:25 PM   #64 
  - They are saying that any one expressing anti war sentiments is not  KlatooBNikto   Dec-14-04 08:05 AM   #35 
     - no, they're saying...  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 03:50 PM   #37 
     - So they have decided that the Party is in support of the war?  CoffeeAnnan   Dec-14-04 03:53 PM   #39 
        - do you still beat your wife?  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 04:24 PM   #58 
     - Then the Democrats are for the war?  tsuki   Dec-14-04 05:27 PM   #65 
        - More or less  theboss   Dec-15-04 03:59 PM   #98 
  - Can you be any more apologetic for the Bush* enablers?  Q   Dec-14-04 07:54 AM   #32 
  - can you be any more hypocritical?  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 03:52 PM   #38 
  - They're advocating censoreship ...  chicagiana   Dec-14-04 10:31 PM   #77 
     - but so is the initial poster  wyldwolf   Dec-15-04 06:09 AM   #86 
  - In fact, Moore is expressing opinions held by most Democrats  bluestateguy   Dec-14-04 06:22 AM   #2 
  - Suppress?  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 06:25 AM   #6 
  - You know, we do have a problem  UL_Approved   Dec-14-04 06:24 AM   #5 
  - Those who speak truth  JNelson6563   Dec-14-04 06:27 AM   #7 
  - Moore has a right to speak his mind  AliciaKeyedUp   Dec-14-04 06:29 AM   #10 
  - yes he does, thankfully, but so do those who disagree with him  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 06:31 AM   #12 
  - I want to see these supposed Democrats call the Republicans to  KlatooBNikto   Dec-14-04 06:38 AM   #17 
  - spare me your wounded bird act  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 06:39 AM   #20 
  - I agree  AliciaKeyedUp   Dec-14-04 06:38 AM   #19 
  - As far as I am concerned, there should be. I do not want anyone  KlatooBNikto   Dec-14-04 06:34 AM   #13 
     - we get the drift  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 06:35 AM   #16 
     - Amazing. Show me one reason why we should be spporting the PNAC doctine.  KlatooBNikto   Dec-14-04 06:40 AM   #22 
        - That's not what he's saying  AliciaKeyedUp   Dec-14-04 06:44 AM   #23 
           - I say that the Republicans enforce the fundamentals of their Party  KlatooBNikto   Dec-14-04 06:47 AM   #25 
           - That is different  AliciaKeyedUp   Dec-14-04 06:49 AM   #27 
              - Let me point out that many DLC members, including Joe Lieberman  KlatooBNikto   Dec-14-04 06:52 AM   #28 
              - Actually...the 2004 platform was written by the DLCers...  Q   Dec-14-04 08:04 AM   #34 
                 - Then vote them out  AliciaKeyedUp   Dec-14-04 06:21 PM   #69 
                 - The DLC is a self-appointed group just like DU.  Blue Wally   Dec-15-04 09:43 AM   #95 
           - Then there should be a 'test' to be a Democrat...  Q   Dec-14-04 08:02 AM   #33 
           - I think there is already a very good test handed to us by these DLC  KlatooBNikto   Dec-14-04 08:08 AM   #36 
           - Most of us aren't all that black and white  AliciaKeyedUp   Dec-14-04 06:22 PM   #70 
              - Then you are not very wise.  Sterling   Dec-15-04 06:34 PM   #117 
           - He is saying there needs to be a test.  Sterling   Dec-15-04 06:30 PM   #115 
              - Well, at least three of the people mentioned in the first post...  tx_dem41   Dec-15-04 06:32 PM   #116 
                 - M. Moore does.  Sterling   Dec-15-04 06:35 PM   #119 
                    - Ummm...there were more people mentioned in the OP.  tx_dem41   Dec-15-04 06:39 PM   #120 
     - Will you come down to Florida..........  Blue Wally   Dec-15-04 09:39 AM   #94 
  - Slamming Michael Moore I agree with  bryant69   Dec-14-04 06:40 AM   #21 
  - I wasn't aware Moore spoke for the Dem Party or ever pretended to.  Garbo 2004   Dec-14-04 06:47 AM   #24 
  - The attempts by the socalled Centrists of the DLC to purge the Party of  KlatooBNikto   Dec-14-04 07:34 AM   #29 
  - what attempts?  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 03:53 PM   #40 
     - Let us start with Michael Moore.The attempt to silence him would  CoffeeAnnan   Dec-14-04 03:59 PM   #42 
        - That isn't a purge nor an attempt to silence him  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 04:02 PM   #43 
           - They try to marginalize him  JNelson6563   Dec-15-04 07:14 AM   #89 
           - there is a difference  wyldwolf   Dec-15-04 04:09 PM   #101 
              - The effect is the same to those in the majority that agree with Moore  Sterling   Dec-15-04 06:39 PM   #121 
                 - "my a viewpoint"....  tx_dem41   Dec-15-04 06:43 PM   #122 
                 - sure it's offensive. Where have I said it wasn't? It is MORE offensive...  wyldwolf   Dec-15-04 06:44 PM   #123 
           - "Loony left", eh? WHAT ABOUT PNAC?  gulfcoastliberal   Dec-16-04 02:49 PM   #131 
  - "Purging" the Democratic Party is not possible.  Bridget Burke   Dec-14-04 07:47 AM   #30 
  - If our party wants to welcome people who subscribe to the PNAC doctrine,  KlatooBNikto   Dec-14-04 07:50 AM   #31 
     - don't let the door hit your ass on the way out  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 03:53 PM   #41 
        - So, you support the PNAC document? And more importantly, do you  CoffeeAnnan   Dec-14-04 04:03 PM   #44 
        - where have I said or implied that? Do you still beat your wife?  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 04:05 PM   #46 
           - Look at the post above.he clearly spells out that those who believe  CoffeeAnnan   Dec-14-04 04:09 PM   #48 
              - that is his opinion. He doesn't make that decision...  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 04:15 PM   #52 
                 - First of all, the poster's premise is that PNAC is against all principles  CoffeeAnnan   Dec-14-04 04:22 PM   #56 
                    - second of all...  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 04:31 PM   #60 
                       - Lieberman, FYI, is a cosigner of the PNAC document.  CoffeeAnnan   Dec-14-04 04:34 PM   #62 
                          - no, he co-signed the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 04:38 PM   #63 
                             - Go to the PNAC's website:  KlatooBNikto   Dec-14-04 05:38 PM   #66 
                             - can't seem to find it...  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 05:44 PM   #67 
                                - On that website if you look you will find a long list of signatories,  CoffeeAnnan   Dec-14-04 06:22 PM   #71 
                                   - where? Where is the link to this list of cosigners of the PNAC document?  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 06:23 PM   #72 
                             - He called for conflict with Iraq, in 2001  muriel_volestrangler   Dec-14-04 07:48 PM   #73 
                                - but that doesn't make him a PNAC cosigner  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 09:06 PM   #75 
        - You've made this very same response several times...  Q   Dec-14-04 04:19 PM   #55 
           - ... and will continue to do so...  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 04:23 PM   #57 
           - that is the contradiction  m berst   Dec-14-04 11:05 PM   #79 
           - on the contrary  wyldwolf   Dec-15-04 05:36 AM   #82 
           - drop the name calling and address the issues ...  welshTerrier2   Dec-14-04 11:15 PM   #80 
              - why is that people on the far left find it perfectly ok to "name call"  wyldwolf   Dec-15-04 05:48 AM   #83 
                 - generalizations and bullshit ...  welshTerrier2   Dec-15-04 09:12 AM   #93 
                    - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-15-04 04:06 PM   #100 
                    - I think you need to read it again  wyldwolf   Dec-15-04 05:08 PM   #106 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-14-04 05:47 PM   #68 
  - Michael Moore has never spoke for the Democratic Party  donheld   Dec-14-04 04:03 PM   #45 
  - Michael Moore speaks for a lot of Democrats, as the popularity of  CoffeeAnnan   Dec-14-04 04:06 PM   #47 
     - Correct he spoke for me in F911  donheld   Dec-14-04 04:14 PM   #51 
        - True.  CoffeeAnnan   Dec-14-04 04:15 PM   #53 
  - Moore is a Democrat?  MisterCompletly   Dec-14-04 04:11 PM   #49 
  - During the 2004 elections, he disavowed Nader and came out  CoffeeAnnan   Dec-14-04 04:14 PM   #50 
  - but he didn't join the Dem party  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 04:17 PM   #54 
     - Michael Moore did more with that movie for our Party's morale at a  CoffeeAnnan   Dec-14-04 04:26 PM   #59 
        - true, but it still does not alter the facts...  wyldwolf   Dec-14-04 04:33 PM   #61 
        - And Damn, you do have some hang up with Lieberman!  Forkboy   Dec-14-04 07:58 PM   #74 
        - please explain yourself  m berst   Dec-14-04 09:20 PM   #76 
           - what, are you a schoolmaster or something?  wyldwolf   Dec-15-04 05:59 AM   #84 
              - You still didn't explain yourself...  Q   Dec-15-04 06:08 AM   #85 
              - was I talking to you?  wyldwolf   Dec-15-04 06:18 AM   #87 
                 - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-15-04 06:49 AM   #88 
                    - can dish it out but can't take it?  wyldwolf   Dec-15-04 03:59 PM   #99 
                       - Coming soon - "I know you are but what am I?"  Forkboy   Dec-15-04 04:19 PM   #102 
                       - truer words were never spoken  wyldwolf   Dec-15-04 04:20 PM   #103 
                       - Well...I guess we won't be able to discern if they were 'absurd'...  Q   Dec-15-04 06:22 PM   #114 
                          - you're a bit confused  wyldwolf   Dec-16-04 04:23 PM   #133 
              - no, not a schoolmaster  m berst   Dec-15-04 02:05 PM   #97 
                 - you really don't understand, do you?  wyldwolf   Dec-15-04 05:07 PM   #105 
                    - it may be irreconcilable  m berst   Dec-15-04 07:56 PM   #124 
        - Deuont ruag uunn Liueebermun  chicagiana   Dec-14-04 10:37 PM   #78 
  - Yes, Michael Moore is a Democrat  Columbia   Dec-15-04 05:10 PM   #107 
     - Wow, he doesn't have time to vote?  ArkDem   Dec-16-04 12:40 PM   #127 
  - moore et al are populist threats to dnc power. of course moore's attacked  kodi   Dec-14-04 11:57 PM   #81 
  - i thought michael moore was not a democrat?  SheepyMcSheepster   Dec-15-04 07:28 AM   #90 
  - "(Opinions) About Michael Moore Should Not Be Tolerated"  GiovanniC   Dec-15-04 07:31 AM   #91 
  - It's my understanding that the NDN is working to marginalize the DLC  w4rma   Dec-15-04 08:13 AM   #92 
  - They are not "on the left"  UdoKier   Dec-15-04 04:21 PM   #104 
  - Do you really feel like people like....  tx_dem41   Dec-15-04 05:14 PM   #108 
     - If you can't tolerate reasoned dissent against administration policy...  UdoKier   Dec-15-04 05:20 PM   #110 
        - Okay....so you haven't read the three I asked about. n/t  tx_dem41   Dec-15-04 05:20 PM   #111 
           - Of course. I don't read every obscure blogger on the net.  UdoKier   Dec-15-04 05:29 PM   #112 
              - Yow....with all due respect...  tx_dem41   Dec-15-04 05:33 PM   #113 
                 - And I don't troll the liberal blogosphere.  UdoKier   Dec-15-04 08:02 PM   #125 
                    - Ummm...I think by my past posts, I have been quite clear....  tx_dem41   Dec-16-04 06:12 AM   #126 
                       - Nothing negative meant by "trolling."  UdoKier   Dec-16-04 02:29 PM   #128 
  - This pretty much is the position of the great Indian scholars  ArkDem   Dec-15-04 05:18 PM   #109 
  - the DLC is going to be our undoing....i just made another post about them  UpsideDownFlag   Dec-15-04 06:35 PM   #118 
  - No  IStriker   Dec-16-04 02:43 PM   #129 
  - I reject the premise.  robcon   Dec-16-04 02:48 PM   #130 
  - MM doesn't speak *FOR* the democratic party  Selwynn   Dec-16-04 02:49 PM   #132 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC