You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: response [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
BevHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. response
She may have very grounded legal reasons to not divulge all her info so quickly.

yup.

Maybe let's just be mindful of who is speaking the truth and dismiss what is really no more than a silly misunderstanding.

Not silly when you've worked for two years to establish credibility and the type of allegations made in the Olbermann editorial are very serious for anyone doing any type of journalism. He said we have repeatedly refused to show the tapes and that our behavior indicates we may be making up news.

That's pretty overt. The standard way to deal with this, in journalism, is to simply issue a correction.

Bev
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC