You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #108: I fail to see how 'years of legal experience' would cause lawyers to [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
BevHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #99
108. I fail to see how 'years of legal experience' would cause lawyers to
concede Ohio without even knowing whether there are 150,000 or 500,000 provisional ballots. A fairly high-up person reported to me that the decision was made to concede in Ohio based on an assurance by Ken Blackwell that there weren't more than 150k of provisionals -- and Ohio STILL has not provided source documents to account for how many provisionals were cast. The concession was made based on an assurance from a Republican partisan?

Good lawyers get the source documents. They do at least a cursory audit. No auditing whatsoever was done, and to this day we don't know who really won.

Now, as to when the case was filed -- Black Box Voting can't file the case. It was a citizen who filed it, and there is evidence that the certification date may have been the 13th, since that is the date the certification meeting was publicly noticed, and that is the date the certification was faxed to the secretary of state. That is also the date that party officials believe certification was done. If so, that makes the filing timely. Volusia's contention is that they shifted the publicly noticed meeting forward by a day, made a decision on the 12th, then faxed it to the secretary of state on the 13th, on the day of the publicly scheduled meeting. Whether that holds water is in question. At any rate, I did not control the filing of the lawsuit, but I think the lawyer has a good case to set aside the filing date even if it is deemed late.

At issue re: the garbage and the authentication -- fortunately, a video crew was inside when the garbage was taken out -- that's on video -- and then they went outside when it was pulled out of the trash. The authentication is actually easier than that, though, since the page is a screen shot that contains unique identifiers to the GEMS system and the machine it's running on.

Bev
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC