You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: Keep'en at it. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Code_Name_D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Keep'en at it.
Did I say not talk about the issue? No, I emphatically did not. I said, in essence, it's pointless to make charges for which there is no proof. That gains nothing.

No. You do worse, by choosing to dictate how the issue is framed, then attacking any one with a different interpretation, even as they may be using your OWN FACTS as conspiracy theorists. I will thus ask this of you again. How can you possibly NOT CONCLUDE that they are not attempting to "rig the election." A critical question given that it is YOUR task to provide evidence to culpability. The GOP is presumed innocent, and SHALL BE innocent, until the mater is raised with the public.

My friend, I've spent hundreds of hours researching this issue, and writing about it in the last several months. If I find that there is evidence of collusion, supportable in court, or by reasonable journalistic standards of proof, you can bet I'll be saying something about it.

But you are not saying this. You instead insist on giving the GOP the benefit of the doubt. Especially in light of past behavior in 2000 and 2002. 2002 also saw Diebold machines at work in Texas, whey the machine, not the voter, would select the candidate. What level of proof are you waiting for to call it rigging the election? Such conclusive evidence only exists in mathematics.

As for 10,000 people in the streets, that stopped the war, didn't it?

At least they tried.

The only way is to let people know that the law now is insufficient to the task of finding election fraud, and have them insist that their legislators change that. Without that, you don't have the tools to determine fraud, and it's your word against the word of someone else. That won't stand up--in the papers or in a court of law.

And pray tell, how do you think such public opinion is brought about? First, they must be informed. And informing the people means more than throwing facts and figures at them. As an investigator, you must present to them your findings AND your conclusions. You refuse to draw conclusions at all until any and all risk of failure is taken away by a level of proof and evidence that dose not exist. I am not talking about preparing a case for trial, but a case for the people.

Now, how have you helped to inform your legislators, your neighbors and yourself of the real issues in this matter?

And pray tell how can I do this, with no reinforcement from Democrats. Until and Democrat stand up and cries foul, none of us shall have credibility, despite having all of the fact in the world. Which is entirely my point. Until YOU stand up and say the election is being rigged, I don't have a brick to stand on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC