quaker bill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-10-04 07:54 PM
Response to Original message |
| 19. I think if we are going to start regulating female reprodictive organs |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-10-04 08:02 PM by quaker bill
Then a sense of equity should prevail. How about a pole tax? (Levied by the centimeter - it would help cut down on the exaggeration bit)
Perhaps an phalic operators permit? Pregnancy resulting from the unlicensed operation of your unit resulting in fines and imprisonment?
I am good with the divorce ammendment. Perhaps with forfeiture of all property and assets in the case of infidelity resulting in divorce. Prison on the second offense.
|
| -Suppose we could get anti-divorce amendments on the ballots |
elperromagico |
Nov-10-04 01:46 PM |
#0 |
-
Interesting. Would that Mobilize our base? Could that be our wedge |
Shoeempress |
Nov-10-04 01:48 PM |
#1 |
 -
that's excatly |
chelsea32491 |
Nov-10-04 01:50 PM |
#3 |
-
Our Bible Belt friends could take a cue from liberal Massachusetts, |
elperromagico |
Nov-10-04 01:52 PM |
#5 |
-
Excellent Idea |
BOSSHOG |
Nov-10-04 01:49 PM |
#2 |
 -
To honor the holy institution of marriage by rendering divorce illegal. |
elperromagico |
Nov-10-04 01:51 PM |
#4 |
  -
matthew 19:6 |
onenote |
Nov-10-04 01:56 PM |
#8 |
 -
You should be able to get every devout Catholic to go for it, since |
Shoeempress |
Nov-10-04 01:54 PM |
#6 |
-
Divorce is one of the things... |
Davis_X_Machina |
Nov-10-04 01:55 PM |
#7 |
 -
Yet both Protestants and Catholics read the same basic Bible, |
elperromagico |
Nov-10-04 02:00 PM |
#9 |
-
Attack it from a different angle. Try to get "Covenant Marriages" on |
GumboYaYa |
Nov-10-04 02:41 PM |
#10 |
 -
Then we can get even more fundies to the polls, No thanks, they |
Shoeempress |
Nov-10-04 06:54 PM |
#14 |
-
Actually, when I think about it, those "covenant marriages" are |
GumboYaYa |
Nov-10-04 08:11 PM |
#22 |
-
Dear God, please no... |
SouthALdem |
Nov-10-04 02:45 PM |
#11 |
-
and make adultery and pre-marital sex a crime, too |
tandot |
Nov-10-04 02:56 PM |
#12 |
-
I'll support it |
Qanisqineq |
Nov-10-04 03:02 PM |
#13 |
-
Do some tongue in cheek amendments |
69KV |
Nov-10-04 07:42 PM |
#15 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-10-04 07:43 PM |
#16 |
 -
You sign up today and spam this shit all over the board!? STOP NOW! |
jefferson_dem |
Nov-10-04 07:44 PM |
#17 |
-
Anti-Divorce and Adultery |
killbotfactory |
Nov-10-04 07:45 PM |
#18 |
-
I think if we are going to start regulating female reprodictive organs |
quaker bill |
Nov-10-04 07:54 PM |
#19 |
-
And better yet... GET REPUBLICANS TO TAKE POSITIONS ON IT |
killbotfactory |
Nov-10-04 07:57 PM |
#20 |
-
My sentiments exactly |
floridadem30 |
Nov-10-04 08:04 PM |
#21 |
-
I remember reading that in Russia, divorce was illegal |
Digit |
Nov-10-04 08:44 PM |
#23 |
 -
We wouldn't push these amendments thinking they'd pass. |
elperromagico |
Nov-10-04 09:49 PM |
#24 |
-
As I said in an earlier reply, you don't put these amendments up |
elperromagico |
Nov-10-04 09:59 PM |
#25 |