You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #119: Hmm - that is interesting. But it would mean he put party over country [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #107
119. Hmm - that is interesting. But it would mean he put party over country
Do you think he's capable of that? Even if Congress and the Executive Branch washed each other for four years, wouldn't that be better than a total one-party state? Including the Supreme Court? For perhaps generations?
The repukes don't have a problem with failure, or rock bottom. They profit no matter what. And if they own the media and the vote count, and they do, they don't need to worry about public opinion. Any more than they had to this time.
But it's an interesting thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC