TruthIsAll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-30-03 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
|
I used 666 as an example. But the true question is what is the probability that ANY result occurs exactly 3 (or more) times in the set of N lotteries or elections? Here it is more complicated, because we do not know precisely the number of Repub voters, the underlying distribution around the mean, the range, etc.
I think that perhaps the uniform distribution, where ALL vote counts are equally likely within a range, may be a good, first-cut model, due to its simplicity. In fact, this is what I used intially, until I meandered into the Poisson Distribution - which may or may not be appropriate.
|
| -Next time, you TIA-bashers, bring YOUR own model into my thread, OK? |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-30-03 02:05 AM |
#0 |
-
TIA, you do a shitload of work |
Terwilliger |
Aug-30-03 02:10 AM |
#1 |
-
What posts on the JFK assassination? |
JustJoe |
Aug-30-03 02:10 AM |
#2 |
 -
Here it is... |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-30-03 02:45 AM |
#4 |
-
Here are the JFK mystery deaths referenced above. The link is broken . |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-30-03 07:24 PM |
#24 |
-
I appreciate the work you do, and that of Bev and DemActivist also. |
oasis |
Aug-30-03 02:24 AM |
#3 |
-
No criticism from me. |
Old and In the Way |
Aug-30-03 05:47 AM |
#5 |
-
TIA, I barely got a B- in a 100 level stats class |
Cheswick |
Aug-30-03 05:56 AM |
#6 |
-
i think the basic problem is a fundamental misapplication of statistics |
treepig |
Aug-30-03 08:48 AM |
#7 |
 -
Its amazing how those truly statistically challenged, like yourself... |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-30-03 11:39 AM |
#9 |
  -
hey, have fun! |
treepig |
Aug-30-03 11:59 AM |
#11 |
 -
I have just refuted YOUR twisted logic, but like a Repuke, |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-30-03 12:03 PM |
#12 |
  -
ok, thank you for the clarification! |
treepig |
Aug-30-03 12:19 PM |
#14 |
 -
My motive? You want a motive? Um.... ok |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-30-03 12:27 PM |
#15 |
  -
i've taken statistic classes |
treepig |
Aug-30-03 03:56 PM |
#18 |
 -
You miss the point. We are not trying to "prove" anything.. |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-30-03 05:22 PM |
#19 |
 -
the statistical analysis is not necessary |
Cocoa |
Aug-30-03 06:15 PM |
#21 |
 -
you seem to be preaching to the choir here |
treepig |
Aug-30-03 08:30 PM |
#27 |
  -
You'd be surprised who is attending here: many non-believers |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-30-03 08:50 PM |
#28 |
  -
i didn't have time to finish the post yesterday |
treepig |
Aug-31-03 08:33 AM |
#42 |
 -
Actually...the poisson distributions... |
Nazgul35 |
Aug-30-03 09:15 PM |
#31 |
 -
Nazgul35, yours is an incisive, intelligent post.. |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-30-03 10:27 PM |
#37 |
 -
The correct question is |
dsc |
Aug-30-03 10:47 PM |
#38 |
 -
dsc, precisely... |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-30-03 11:04 PM |
#39 |
 -
I would probably start |
dsc |
Aug-30-03 11:54 PM |
#40 |
 -
to naysay the naysayers... |
Nazgul35 |
Aug-31-03 12:14 AM |
#41 |
 -
Here is what many of us have a problem with |
dsc |
Aug-31-03 09:00 AM |
#43 |
 -
Nuts. |
Jackpine Radical |
Aug-30-03 12:48 PM |
#16 |
 -
predictability can only be achieved through a cause and effect relationshi |
treepig |
Aug-30-03 03:32 PM |
#17 |
 -
you know what I like? |
JNelson6563 |
Aug-30-03 11:48 AM |
#10 |
-
If they can't appreciate what you do |
blm |
Aug-30-03 09:34 AM |
#8 |
-
Having been called a McCarthyite Klansman this morning on DU myself |
Generic Other |
Aug-30-03 12:05 PM |
#13 |
-
I don't like math |
Eloriel |
Aug-30-03 06:03 PM |
#20 |
-
a priori vs a posteriori |
TomNickell |
Aug-30-03 06:30 PM |
#22 |
 -
Tom, your argument ain't worth a plumb Nickel |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-30-03 08:06 PM |
#26 |
-
Don't think we'll get anywhere but I'll try.... |
TomNickell |
Aug-30-03 09:04 PM |
#29 |
 -
I said I wouldn't be drawn in, but I can't resist.. |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-30-03 09:47 PM |
#32 |
-
Off the Wall? |
TomNickell |
Aug-30-03 10:23 PM |
#35 |
-
cops and nightclub owners |
dsc |
Aug-30-03 09:06 PM |
#30 |
-
Shady? A nice 1964 kind of word. |
TomNickell |
Aug-30-03 10:27 PM |
#36 |
-
WHO IS BASHING MY BELOVED TIA |
Skittles |
Aug-30-03 07:24 PM |
#23 |
 -
Thanks, Skittles, but this GUY can take care of himself... |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-30-03 07:46 PM |
#25 |
-
Naw, I don't discriminate based on gender |
Skittles |
Aug-31-03 05:35 PM |
#44 |
-
This is intriguing and is worthy of research |
MODemocrat |
Aug-30-03 09:57 PM |
#33 |
-
I love junk science! |
nwstrn |
Aug-30-03 10:16 PM |
#34 |