You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: Sure [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
RivetJoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Sure
Right now it is in effect "indefinitely." I'm sure the UN could always propose relooking it. Nothing wrong with debating the issue again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Do nations have the right to bear nuclear arms? BurtWorm  Sep-21-04 09:06 AM   #0 
  - I totally agree  theexpat   Sep-21-04 09:18 AM   #1 
  - This was occurring to me as I read an article about What to Do about Iran  BurtWorm   Sep-21-04 09:24 AM   #3 
  - Yes, as long as businesses are allowed to post "We prohibit nuclear  ftbc   Sep-21-04 09:23 AM   #2 
  - No but I think they should arm nuclear bears so terrorists don't use them  yellowcanine   Sep-21-04 09:25 AM   #4 
  - Nuclear bears, huh?  theexpat   Sep-21-04 09:26 AM   #5 
  - Kind of puts the Hypocrisy onto those wanting Assault Weapons  Bandit   Sep-21-04 09:47 AM   #6 
  - Exactly.  BurtWorm   Sep-21-04 10:26 AM   #7 
  - Isn't that sort of like saying, "Why make it illegal to murder someone?  TexasSissy   Sep-21-04 10:57 AM   #8 
  - Having a weapon is not the same as killing someone.  BurtWorm   Sep-21-04 11:30 AM   #9 
     - Yes, having any sort of weapon implies future use of it. Ask  TexasSissy   Sep-21-04 11:35 AM   #11 
        - The point is, a few countries are dictating who can and can't have them  BurtWorm   Sep-21-04 11:42 AM   #15 
           - There's some sort of accord or agreement about  TexasSissy   Sep-21-04 03:01 PM   #24 
  - In a word, YES, imo...  Spazito   Sep-21-04 11:33 AM   #10 
  - YES  ilovenicepeople   Sep-21-04 11:40 AM   #13 
  - If they signd the Treaty on Non-proliferation  RivetJoint   Sep-21-04 11:42 AM   #14 
     - I seem to recall the US signed a few Treaties that Bush*  Bandit   Sep-21-04 12:27 PM   #16 
     - We didn't walk away from START  RivetJoint   Sep-21-04 12:51 PM   #19 
        - Bush walked away from the ABM  BurtWorm   Sep-21-04 12:55 PM   #22 
           - Yep  RivetJoint   Sep-21-04 01:11 PM   #23 
     - I think the whole concept of nonproliferation needs to be rethought.  BurtWorm   Sep-21-04 12:42 PM   #17 
        - Sure  RivetJoint   Sep-21-04 12:54 PM   #20 
  - No nukes for anyone  MacDo   Sep-21-04 11:36 AM   #12 
     - I agree there is no need for such horrific weapons  951   Sep-21-04 12:43 PM   #18 
     - Should individual Americans be allowed to own nuclear weapons?  skjpm   Sep-21-04 12:55 PM   #21 
     - I'm with you  GreenPartyVoter   Sep-21-04 03:03 PM   #25 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC