You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: post #23 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. post #23
Edited on Mon Sep-06-04 12:01 PM by seemslikeadream
They could well afford it. In the final days of the Bush (Senior) administration, the Interior Department made an extraordinary but little noticed change in procedures under the 1872 Mining Law, the gold rush–era act that permitted those whiskered small-time prospectors with their tin pans and mules to stake claims on their tiny plots. The department initiated an expedited procedure for mining companies that allowed Barrick to swiftly lay claim to the largest gold find in America. In the terminology of the law, Barrick could "perfect its patent" on the estimated $10 billion in ore—for which Barrick paid the U.S. Treasury a little under $10,000. Eureka!

Barrick, of course, had to put up cash for the initial property rights and the cost of digging out the booty (and the cost of donations, in smaller amounts, to support Nevada's Democratic senator, Harry Reid). Still, the shift in rules paid off big time: According to experts at the Mineral Policy Center of Washington, DC, Barrick saved—and the U.S. taxpayer lost—a cool billion or so. Upon taking office, Bill Clinton's new interior secretary, Bruce Babbitt, called Barrick's claim the "biggest gold heist since the days of Butch Cassidy." Nevertheless, because the company followed the fast-track process laid out for them under Bush, this corporate Goldfinger had Babbitt by the legal nuggets. Clinton had no choice but to give them the gold mine while the public got the shaft.

Barrick says it had no contact whatsoever with the president at the time of the rules change.<1> There was always a place in Barrick's heart for the older Bush—and a place on its payroll. In 1995, Barrick hired the former president as Honorary Senior Advisor to the Toronto company's International Advisory Board. Bush joined at the suggestion of former Canadian prime minister Brian Mulroney, who, like Bush, had been ignominiously booted from office. I was a bit surprised that the president had signed on. When Bush was voted out of the White House, he vowed never to lobby or join a corporate board. The chairman of Barrick openly boasts that granting the title "Senior Advisor" was a sly maneuver to help Bush tiptoe around this promise.

I was curious: What does one do with a used president? Barrick vehemently denies that it appointed Bush "in order to procure him to make contact with other world leaders whom he knows, or who could be of considerable assistance" to the company. Yet, in September 1996, Bush wrote a letter to help convince Indonesian dictator Suharto to give Barrick a new, hot gold-mining concession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -How many here know who Adnan Khashoggi is? tinanator  Sep-06-04 10:38 AM   #0 
  - No. Waiting for more info. n/t  democratreformed   Sep-06-04 10:39 AM   #1 
  - google.com  tinanator   Sep-06-04 10:40 AM   #3 
     - okay, you have awakened my curiosity  democratreformed   Sep-06-04 10:46 AM   #9 
  - Arms Dealer...  desi   Sep-06-04 10:39 AM   #2 
  - wasn't he also suspected to have played a role in the October Surprise?  salin   Sep-06-04 12:32 PM   #30 
  - Saudi arms dealer? The guy who got guns for the Contras?  gtrump   Sep-06-04 10:40 AM   #4 
  - no surprise, really  tinanator   Sep-06-04 10:42 AM   #5 
  - i knew that name was familar  AZDemDist6   Sep-06-04 10:42 AM   #6 
  - Ms. Butterfly Ballot was a stewardess on his private plane  realFedUp   Sep-06-04 10:43 AM   #7 
  - that blows me away  tinanator   Sep-06-04 10:43 AM   #8 
  - Yep.  bobthedrummer   Sep-06-04 10:46 AM   #10 
  - I do  wryter2000   Sep-06-04 10:47 AM   #11 
  - Dirtbag Saudi arms dealer  mitchum   Sep-06-04 10:47 AM   #12 
  - Pardoned by George Bush Sr.  seemslikeadream   Sep-06-04 10:49 AM   #13 
  - He's got a mighty  dogtag   Sep-06-04 10:57 AM   #16 
     - Bush the Elder’s Scheme to Sell Pardons and Get a Payoff  seemslikeadream   Sep-06-04 11:05 AM   #23 
     - I've seen it while out in a boat  Nashyra   Sep-06-04 11:30 AM   #27 
  - Adnan Khashoggi, Saudi businessman/billionaire/arms dealer  democratreformed   Sep-06-04 10:54 AM   #14 
  - More info:  democratreformed   Sep-06-04 10:58 AM   #18 
     - Tied to the Al-Fayed's also:  democratreformed   Sep-06-04 11:21 AM   #25 
  - Not only do I know who  tmfun   Sep-06-04 10:55 AM   #15 
  - Arms dealer glamourized by the Reagan press for the ostentatious spending  bo44   Sep-06-04 10:57 AM   #17 
  - he's tight with manucher ghorbanifar..  frylock   Sep-06-04 10:58 AM   #19 
  - funny how that name comes up in the TREASON story of today  seemslikeadream   Sep-06-04 11:06 AM   #24 
  - Some interesting reading here  seemslikeadream   Sep-06-04 10:59 AM   #20 
  - The important question:  democratreformed   Sep-06-04 11:00 AM   #21 
  - 1992  democratreformed   Sep-06-04 11:05 AM   #22 
     - yeah and GHWB's net worth is about $2 million...  tinanator   Sep-06-04 11:57 AM   #28 
        - post #23  seemslikeadream   Sep-06-04 12:00 PM   #29 
  - BCCI?  kestrel91316   Sep-06-04 11:24 AM   #26 
  - Adnan's dirty, even by BFEE standards.  Octafish   Sep-06-04 01:03 PM   #31 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC