You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: We ain't seen nothing yet.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. We ain't seen nothing yet....
Edited on Sun Aug-22-04 10:19 AM by teryang
If dipshit gets backs in office, all checks will be off the abuse of the armed forces. The downsized, outsourced, part time, low benefits forces, will be entirely dominated by corporate agendas and political expediency (defense contractors, energy lobbies, various Israeli lobbies, and Karl Rove).

Tooth to tail and armed forces lite are a fraud on the U.S. Armed Forces meant to line war profiteer pockets at the expense of patriotic volunteer manpower. What the armed forces and their dedicated personnel are used for now has little to do with national defense. While talking about "armed forces lite" Herr Rumsfeldt and the defense contractors are running a huge "cold war" outsized operation emptying the treasury of future generations.

If you did a cost benefit analysis on American defense expenditures which equal that of the rest of entire world combined, you'd find that it only collaterally serves its purpose while being entirely at the service of the "have more" crust of GOP support. Is it any suprise the guy running the GOP convention is a Raytheon lobbyist?

See this Asis Times article about this years $500 billion tab:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/FH19Dj01.ht...

Military spending nears $1 trillion
By Thalif Deen

<"Despite President Bush's rhetoric about realigning military forces, the new military budget still funds Cold War weapons designed to counter expected Soviet developments. But the Soviet Union hasn't existed for more than a decade," she said.<snip>

<Under the Bush administration, Pentagon spending has increased more than 23% (in adjusted dollars). But while many Americans think that money is for the "war on terrorism", that is not the case, Berrigan said. The defense allocation does not include the costs of ongoing fighting - about $5 billion each month - in Afghanistan and Iraq.

"These costs are paid through emergency supplementals. So far, the US Congress has signed off on $190 billion in supplemental spending for war and occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan," she said.

The Congressional Budget Office projects that between fiscal year 2005 and the end of the decade, the US will spend $2.2 trillion on the military, feeding the already spiraling global defense spending, Berrigan said. >



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC