You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Republican Rhetoric Works [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
GRocky Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 12:37 AM
Original message
Why Republican Rhetoric Works
Advertisements [?]
I've been thinking about this one for a long time, and I think I've at least come up with a plausible explanation.

Republicans, as we know it, spew gallons of meaningless rhetoric and hurl double-sided promises at voters; the majority of whom will realize no (or possibly negative) gain from their politicking. At first, I thought that it was the Republican party's focus on the quick gain of a few dollars via tax cuts that won over the easily-swayed, under-informed voter. I also thought that their focus on "hot" religious issues had a magnetic effect, since so many Christians in this country are the Sunday-worship types that drop their polished, Godly ways the second they leave their shiny, fluorescent lit sanctuaries. But this, also, seems to be a bit far-reaching.

The answer was a lot more simple than that. Remember cavorting about on the playground as a kid? Remember how much fun it was to start rumors about your fellow students, and to join in on rumor spreading, teasing, and the general destruction of the unfortunate child's reputation? Now think, how often did you decide to extol the virtues of your friends? How much time was spent talking about why your friends were important to you and building this type of camraderie? Clearly the answer is not much, if any at all. The fast friendships of the playground were forged through crowding the stinking trough of trash talk and rumors. And that's why Republicans win over voters. Because they aren't afraid to talk trash, create harmful rumors and generally launch smear campaigns against their competition.

Allow me to generalize for a moment in saying that Republicans are much more guilty of stooping to these tactics than their liberal counterparts; one need only look to the guidance of Karl Rove to see the truth in this. The smear tactics of the neo-conservative faction make it easy for me to write them off as the worthless scum that I perceive them to be.

With this in mind, I like to practice the "keep you friends close, keep your enemies closer" philosophy. I try to read/listen/watch extreme neo-conservative news to keep my finger on the pulse. After weeks of doing that, it was easy for me to observe this pattern. Peruse, if you will, the web site of that fine conservative hero, Rush Limbaugh. At the moment, he's got no less than 15 "points of interest" that make vicious, far-reaching claims about liberals. Today, I can't see a single link that praises Bush's performance or offers a clear reason as to why he would be a finer choice. Rush instead employs the technique of bludgeoning liberals so far into the "evil" category that Lucifer himself would garner the vote as the "lesser of two evils" by an uninformed Dittohead.

You'll find much of the same garbage on Sean Hannity's web site. Or Ann Coulter's, or anybody elses.

So, the question remains. What is this all about? Is this just an ugly trait of human nature? A dog-eat-dog instinct that we're born with? Do we try to pick out the weak among us and do away with them in an attempt to make ourselves look stronger? If this is the case, do we need a liberal "champion" like Limbaugh to lunge for the jugular of conservatives? Al Franken certainly doesn't pull anything near Limbaugh's antics on Air America. But that's a difficult question, because I see a lot of Limbaugh's schtick as the distortion of reality and the tarting up of many unsensational leads. It lacks class to say the least. But if the Democrats can't find a way to counter the trash talk of the right, the trough will be crowded by even more hungry voters.

I like to think that people enjoy peace more than conflict, but in this day and age, it's hard to tell. What does everybody else think about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC