You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #48: I think I hit an effing nerve. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-04 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
48. I think I hit an effing nerve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Who thinks that the phrase "girlie man" is sexist? MikeG  Jul-19-04 03:18 PM   #0 
  - I think it was stupid  bryant69   Jul-19-04 03:23 PM   #1 
  - I think it's just stupid  NoPasaran   Jul-19-04 03:24 PM   #2 
  - I said yes because I saw that Nostjam commics..oops did not bump..  patdem   Jul-19-04 03:24 PM   #3 
  - sexist and homophobic  sandnsea   Jul-19-04 03:24 PM   #4 
  - Sexist, yes. Homophobic, no.  aden_nak   Jul-19-04 03:30 PM   #6 
  - Really?  sandnsea   Jul-19-04 03:32 PM   #8 
     - No one has called them gay, just effeminate.  MikeG   Jul-19-04 03:36 PM   #11 
        - that is the stereotype that homophobes buy into  TeacherCreature   Jul-19-04 03:41 PM   #15 
        - Thank you. Exactly n/t  sandnsea   Jul-19-04 03:47 PM   #23 
        - If Arnie had said "Little girlie-gay-men!" I would agree 100%.  aden_nak   Jul-19-04 04:00 PM   #32 
           - not all of us need to be hit on the head with a hammer  TeacherCreature   Jul-19-04 06:08 PM   #65 
        - Good point  PeaceForever   Jul-19-04 04:37 PM   #55 
  - Amen, sandnsea.  Nay   Jul-19-04 03:36 PM   #10 
  - its actually more homophobic than sexist.  Selwynn   Jul-19-04 04:09 PM   #40 
  - only a no account panty waist would  Misinformed01   Jul-19-04 03:29 PM   #5 
  - Who thinks the sky is blue?  redqueen   Jul-19-04 03:32 PM   #7 
  - Stupid and immature.  UdoKier   Jul-19-04 03:34 PM   #9 
  - Stupid thing for a politician to say.  yella_dawg   Jul-19-04 03:36 PM   #12 
  - Tucker Carlson just ridiculed complaints that it was insensitive  Sparkly   Jul-19-04 03:37 PM   #13 
  - Oh now that's telling, isn't it?!  redqueen   Jul-19-04 03:44 PM   #17 
  - Fuck insensitive  sandnsea   Jul-19-04 03:49 PM   #24 
  - GIRLIE MAN????? they want to talk about a GIRLIE MAN!!!  underpants   Jul-19-04 03:40 PM   #14 
  - A problem of impugning on others to minimize ones own failures is obvious  nolabels   Jul-19-04 05:35 PM   #62 
  - SEXIST?  matcom   Jul-19-04 03:43 PM   #16 
  - Trying to insult a man by calling him "woman-like"  MikeG   Jul-19-04 03:47 PM   #22 
  - sure  matcom   Jul-19-04 03:51 PM   #28 
     - Are you telling me I can't wear my pink tutu anymore?  MikeG   Jul-19-04 03:53 PM   #29 
  - Why is this so hard to understand?  TeacherCreature   Jul-19-04 03:50 PM   #25 
     - i would say you were a Moran for using the wrong racial slur  matcom   Jul-19-04 04:00 PM   #31 
        - I wouldn't care  TeacherCreature   Jul-19-04 06:09 PM   #66 
  - It isn't sexist...it's homophobic.  GOPisEvil   Jul-19-04 03:45 PM   #18 
  - No David...it's also sexist...  VelmaD   Jul-19-04 03:46 PM   #21 
     - I don't see it that way...  GOPisEvil   Jul-19-04 04:00 PM   #33 
        - But why is it an insult to him?  VelmaD   Jul-19-04 04:02 PM   #34 
           - It's fine for women to be girly, but not men. (In Arnold's tiny mind)  GOPisEvil   Jul-19-04 04:05 PM   #37 
  - sexist against men and women.  rbnyc   Jul-19-04 03:45 PM   #19 
  - Well said  redqueen   Jul-19-04 03:50 PM   #26 
     - Thanks. (nt)  rbnyc   Jul-19-04 03:51 PM   #27 
  - In real life, Ahhnold uses the F-git word....  readmylips   Jul-19-04 03:45 PM   #20 
  - Immature yes, sexist no  mjf3   Jul-19-04 03:55 PM   #30 
  - I do.  put out   Jul-19-04 04:10 PM   #43 
  - Oh pish posh! Why get HYSTERICAL* about it?  redqueen   Jul-19-04 04:02 PM   #35 
  - I know what you mean.  VelmaD   Jul-19-04 04:04 PM   #36 
  - When I first saw the word hysterical...  rbnyc   Jul-19-04 04:07 PM   #38 
     - I don't see what's so hard to understand about it either  redqueen   Jul-19-04 04:09 PM   #41 
        - No worries. I just read the subject line...  rbnyc   Jul-19-04 04:15 PM   #46 
  - I don't care - it was surreal-ly hilarious (clarification inside)  Selwynn   Jul-19-04 04:08 PM   #39 
  - It's homophobic, because of context.  Meldread   Jul-19-04 04:09 PM   #42 
  - Oh goodie, let's play divide and conquer...  VelmaD   Jul-19-04 04:12 PM   #44 
  - I agree, that he likely has a sexist mindset...  Meldread   Jul-19-04 04:40 PM   #56 
  - thank you! n/t  G_j   Jul-19-04 04:47 PM   #57 
  - That's exactly right.  Selwynn   Jul-19-04 04:13 PM   #45 
  - Sexist..... hmmmm, No.  Amaya   Jul-19-04 04:18 PM   #47 
  - I think I hit an effing nerve.  MikeG   Jul-19-04 04:21 PM   #48 
  - He was making a stupid little joke...  damkira   Jul-19-04 04:23 PM   #49 
  - I agree. Football camp is only a week away.  MikeG   Jul-19-04 04:27 PM   #50 
  - You know I really love these threads.  VelmaD   Jul-19-04 04:28 PM   #51 
  - Notice the percentage of those who don't 'get it' is increasing?  redqueen   Jul-19-04 04:30 PM   #52 
  - That is it in a nutshell.  bunnyj   Jul-19-04 04:51 PM   #59 
  - A put-down, based on sex. How could that NOT be sexist?  Feanorcurufinwe   Jul-19-04 04:35 PM   #53 
  - Stunning...  VelmaD   Jul-19-04 04:36 PM   #54 
  - Sexist? Probably,  CHestonsucks   Jul-19-04 04:48 PM   #58 
  - Well, I'll never let an insult to douchebags go unchallenged!!  bunnyj   Jul-19-04 04:52 PM   #60 
  - It is absolutely sexist. "Enron Arnie" obviously thinks women are inferior  Zorra   Jul-19-04 04:58 PM   #61 
  - Arnold's actions aren't worthy of someone in a prestigious position,  HypnoToad   Jul-19-04 06:02 PM   #63 
  - It's beyond sexist. It's MISOGYNISTIC!  dralston   Jul-19-04 06:06 PM   #64 
  - Yep! n/t  rucky   Jul-19-04 06:14 PM   #68 
  - Yes, the inference that  Piperay   Jul-19-04 06:10 PM   #67 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC