Reply #142: Bev dodges the question

[Kelvin Mace]

On Point #1, David Allen responds by changing the subject to point two. It is an easily resolvable issue (just post the monthly sales reports and canceled checks, if they actually exist). The best place to resolve it will be in a more formal setting.

Oh, please. Even when you pretend to be taking the high road, you can't avoid a smear. "if they actually exist"?? You know damn well they exist. I am not getting drawn into this argument though until you deal with the proof already provided.

You, meaning Bev Harris, demanded proof you made the accusations in questions. Proof was provided. You now come up with all sorts of reasons to avoid admitting this simple truth:

You lied when you claimed to have never smeared anyone over 'qui tam' You said you NEVER accused anyone and demanded proof you did.

PROOF WAS PROVIDED. IRREFUTABLE, IRON-CLAD PROOF.

You options are:

1) Admit you lied and apologize.

2) Pretend the proof wasn't offered.

Honorable people take option #1. Diebold routinely takes option #2.

The time and place is here and now. I am quite prepared to rebut every charge you have made, here or in court. But I am not going to move on to the next charge until this one disposed with.

Answer ONE question: WHY DID YOU LIE ABOUT ACCUSING PEOPLE OF FILING 'QUI TAM' LAWSUITS?

Nothing is getting buried in the conflict, I, you and everyone else is still pursuing the fight

This is a cop out. You've been caught, just like we caught Diebold. Take responsibility for your actions!

Point #2 is NOT complex. You made your false allegation PUBLICLY, we have proven the allegations untrue publicly. You then denied making the allegations PUBLICLY and we have proven you did PUBLICLY. It is a little late to seek to solve the problem privately when it is you who made the issue public.

The problem you have is that you have now been red-handed in a lie. You are now refusing to own up to the lie. It only gets worse from here, Bev.

You are fleeing DU because you know you are losing credibility. Do you think the issue will stay here? It will follow you.

Jeez, you are now adopting the BushCo playbook:

If you criticize Bush (Bev), you are helping the terrorists (Diebold).