Cheswick2.0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-17-04 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 20. he didn't lie under oath |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 07:57 PM by Cheswick
The court said he didn't. In addition he could not be accused of perjury even if he did lie under oath which he did not. Only perjury is illegal, lying under oath is not.
They didn't have anything on him but they didn't need anything on him because they controlled the congress. That is why the impeachment failed...didn't get through the senate.
|
| -Does anyone here HONESTLY believe that if Bill Clinton fessed up |
CatWoman |
Jun-17-04 07:39 PM |
#0 |
 -
No. If it wasn't Monica, they would have focused harder on something else. |
boxster |
Jun-17-04 07:41 PM |
#1 |
| -
Agree with you completely. It's amazing the GOP found |
FloridaPat |
Jun-17-04 07:41 PM |
#2 |
  -
or find 70 mill for schools |
WLKjr |
Jun-17-04 09:58 PM |
#54 |
| -
Nah - they were gunning for him from the start |
theivoryqueen |
Jun-17-04 07:41 PM |
#3 |
| -
Even When They Have Nothing On Him |
AndyTiedye |
Jun-17-04 07:45 PM |
#5 |
| -
They had to - |
tx.lib |
Jun-17-04 07:46 PM |
#8 |
| -
Zactly.. |
DenverDem |
Jun-17-04 08:14 PM |
#24 |
| -
They just would have pounced on it and bitched and bitched and bitched |
bluestateguy |
Jun-17-04 07:44 PM |
#4 |
| -
They were gunning for him and he handed them some bullets. |
Kimber Scott |
Jun-17-04 07:45 PM |
#6 |
| -
One difference - |
tx.lib |
Jun-17-04 07:50 PM |
#12 |
| -
Oh, I agree with you 1000%. It was personal. |
Kimber Scott |
Jun-17-04 08:07 PM |
#23 |
| -
I just hope that |
tx.lib |
Jun-17-04 08:22 PM |
#28 |
| -
If they want to see him so bad, they should go fight in Iraq! |
Kimber Scott |
Jun-17-04 08:26 PM |
#30 |
| -
Not me. |
bushwentawol |
Jun-17-04 07:46 PM |
#7 |
| -
well technically |
I_like_chicken |
Jun-17-04 07:46 PM |
#9 |
| -
again |
CatWoman |
Jun-17-04 07:48 PM |
#10 |
| -
Hell no |
TheWizardOfMudd |
Jun-17-04 07:49 PM |
#11 |
| -
I remember Orin Hatch coming out |
kskiska |
Jun-17-04 07:51 PM |
#13 |
| -
Hi, Kathy |
CatWoman |
Jun-17-04 07:53 PM |
#16 |
| -
Thanks, Cat |
kskiska |
Jun-17-04 08:54 PM |
#41 |
| -
Orin hatch |
jerryvov |
Jun-17-04 09:19 PM |
#48 |
| -
Poppy Bush screwed around... |
Nlighten1 |
Jun-17-04 07:51 PM |
#14 |
| -
moreover |
WoodrowFan |
Jun-17-04 08:47 PM |
#38 |
| -
He did indeed... |
Nlighten1 |
Jun-17-04 08:55 PM |
#43 |
| -
what happened to her? n/t |
merh |
Jun-17-04 09:30 PM |
#50 |
| -
She is dead... |
Nlighten1 |
Jun-17-04 10:51 PM |
#63 |
| -
with this bunch, you never know do ya! n/t |
merh |
Jun-17-04 10:54 PM |
#65 |
| -
But the Dems- |
tx.lib |
Jun-18-04 01:11 AM |
#75 |
| -
He still would have been badly damaged but........ |
sgr2 |
Jun-17-04 07:52 PM |
#15 |
| -
you truly believe that, don't you? |
CatWoman |
Jun-17-04 07:54 PM |
#18 |
| -
Actually, I do believe it, and I am not young |
sgr2 |
Jun-17-04 08:15 PM |
#25 |
| -
the only problem with your theory |
CatWoman |
Jun-17-04 08:16 PM |
#26 |
| -
Sorry.... |
sgr2 |
Jun-17-04 08:25 PM |
#29 |
| -
He was impeached for perjury |
CatWoman |
Jun-17-04 08:31 PM |
#32 |
| -
Uh, yeah |
sgr2 |
Jun-17-04 08:35 PM |
#33 |
| -
.... |
CatWoman |
Jun-17-04 08:38 PM |
#35 |
| -
one more time!!!! |
CatWoman |
Jun-17-04 08:39 PM |
#36 |
| -
Ok... one more time for you! hehe |
sgr2 |
Jun-17-04 08:58 PM |
#44 |
| -
reading is fundamental |
CatWoman |
Jun-17-04 09:01 PM |
#45 |
| -
Yeah, uh, your point? |
sgr2 |
Jun-17-04 09:04 PM |
#46 |
| -
Point |
CatWoman |
Jun-17-04 09:06 PM |
#47 |
| -
Hey |
sgr2 |
Jun-17-04 11:29 PM |
#69 |
| -
Thanks for the link Cat Woman |
U4ikLefty |
Jun-17-04 11:33 PM |
#71 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-17-04 11:44 PM |
#73 |
| -
You have had your ass handed to you by Catwoman |
Cheswick |
Jun-18-04 06:58 AM |
#82 |
| -
Well... |
sgr2 |
Jun-18-04 07:06 AM |
#85 |
| -
no she didn't |
GreenArrow |
Jun-18-04 07:29 AM |
#89 |
| -
no they didn't have him |
Cheswick |
Jun-18-04 06:52 AM |
#81 |
| -
Actually he did but not what he was impeached for |
leftynyc |
Jun-18-04 06:59 AM |
#83 |
| -
I, like many others, read the Starr report too.... |
cat_girl25 |
Jun-17-04 10:12 PM |
#58 |
| -
I read the juicy parts back then, too |
Politicub |
Jun-17-04 10:29 PM |
#60 |
| -
there was no perjury |
Cheswick |
Jun-18-04 06:47 AM |
#79 |
| -
he didn't lie under oath |
Cheswick |
Jun-17-04 07:56 PM |
#20 |
| -
This is why no Bush investigations |
CatWoman |
Jun-17-04 07:57 PM |
#22 |
| -
that's right |
Cheswick |
Jun-17-04 10:23 PM |
# |
| -
Not quite sure where you're coming from... |
sgr2 |
Jun-17-04 08:17 PM |
#27 |
| -
WRONG.... NO, NOT THE CASE AT ALL |
Cheswick |
Jun-17-04 10:31 PM |
#61 |
| -
Sorry... |
sgr2 |
Jun-18-04 06:38 AM |
#77 |
| -
wrong |
Cheswick |
Jun-18-04 06:46 AM |
#78 |
| -
I think I remember it's only perjury if it is |
leftynyc |
Jun-18-04 07:04 AM |
#84 |
| -
He handled it perfectly |
Cheswick |
Jun-17-04 07:53 PM |
#17 |
| -
snowball. lol. |
Liberal_Guerilla |
Jun-17-04 07:54 PM |
#19 |
| -
Main Ingredient song keeps coming to mind |
CatWoman |
Jun-17-04 07:56 PM |
#21 |
| -
The repukes were out to get him and Hilary |
kippm99 |
Jun-17-04 08:26 PM |
#31 |
| -
"their evil" |
tx.lib |
Jun-17-04 08:37 PM |
#34 |
| -
Nope. |
cmf |
Jun-17-04 08:45 PM |
#37 |
| -
What I want to see is - |
tx.lib |
Jun-17-04 08:48 PM |
#39 |
| -
the only downside to his book |
tigereye |
Jun-17-04 08:54 PM |
#42 |
| -
this time, we agree |
ZombyWoof |
Jun-17-04 08:49 PM |
#40 |
| -
They went on a hunting expedition from the get go..... |
spanone |
Jun-17-04 09:23 PM |
#49 |
| -
I wonder how much of that |
tx.lib |
Jun-17-04 10:03 PM |
#56 |
| -
Agreed |
EstimatedProphet |
Jun-17-04 09:37 PM |
#51 |
| -
Couldn't agree with you more. |
brook |
Jun-17-04 09:38 PM |
#52 |
| -
Buwaaaahaaaahaaa! |
Cleita |
Jun-17-04 10:01 PM |
#55 |
| -
I'm a hundred percent with you CW. |
Cleita |
Jun-17-04 09:56 PM |
#53 |
| -
Cat_girl agrees with Cat Woman.... |
cat_girl25 |
Jun-17-04 10:07 PM |
#57 |
| -
It wouldn't have mattered |
Politicub |
Jun-17-04 10:23 PM |
#59 |
| -
Y'all are hung up on the starr rept.. |
Tellurian |
Jun-17-04 10:40 PM |
#62 |
| -
I think he should have said (a) MYOB and (b) I take the fifth. |
spooky3 |
Jun-17-04 10:52 PM |
#64 |
| -
Thats the thing about Democrats.. |
Tellurian |
Jun-17-04 10:59 PM |
#66 |
| -
I am so over Bill Clinton |
missedherniceguy |
Jun-17-04 11:22 PM |
#67 |
| -
whats to get over? |
Tellurian |
Jun-17-04 11:28 PM |
#68 |
| -
You think Bill Clinton is doing it? |
neebob |
Jun-17-04 11:42 PM |
#72 |
| -
safer to say, Bush enemys are doing it... |
Tellurian |
Jun-17-04 11:51 PM |
#74 |
| -
Well I'm not over Bill Clinton. |
cat_girl25 |
Jun-17-04 11:32 PM |
#70 |
| -
"our" party? |
Bridget Burke |
Jun-18-04 01:21 AM |
#76 |
| -
The people that need to put Clinton behind them are republicans |
Cheswick |
Jun-18-04 07:06 AM |
#86 |
| -
I think Clinton will have the last laugh. |
July |
Jun-18-04 07:57 AM |
#90 |
| -
very well said! |
devrc243 |
Jun-18-04 06:52 AM |
#80 |
| -
Nope.. They wanted a public flogging..and they kept sniffing |
SoCalDem |
Jun-18-04 07:22 AM |
#87 |
| -
Not For Second. |
uptown ruler |
Jun-18-04 07:26 AM |
#88 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread