You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: Exactly, violent revolution rarely works [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Exactly, violent revolution rarely works
A few of the public jerks get eliminated, but the guys who wield the real power, the hidden power brokers, just change uniforms and become part of the new order. In the meantime, violent revolutions are messy, wasteful of resources, and horribly uncomfortable for the survivors.

Nonviolence is the only way to go. Civil disobedience is a large part of this, and occurs when the civil contract is cancelled by the power elite. It's not when civil disobedience happens that change occurs, but when the power structure overreacts to it and deals with it a violent matter. Every time they use violence or other heavy handed suppression techniques, they lose more support, until they are gone completely.

Expect to see a lot of civil disobedience if Bush cheats his way back into office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -You say you want a Revolu---wait....Civil Disobedience maybe mopaul  Jun-17-04 05:00 PM   #0 
  - I'm with ya, Mopaul.  Political_Junkie   Jun-17-04 05:02 PM   #1 
  - Here is an admonition  shraby   Jun-17-04 05:04 PM   #3 
     - Well we are in America  56kid   Jun-17-04 05:06 PM   #4 
     - Exactly, violent revolution rarely works  Warpy   Jun-17-04 05:18 PM   #6 
     - Read a history book.  DemsUnite   Jun-17-04 07:40 PM   #15 
  - I wonder how many people  bloom   Jun-17-04 05:04 PM   #2 
  - Instead of a hunger strike, how about a buy nothing for a week strike?  anarchy1999   Jun-17-04 05:08 PM   #5 
     - large scale national work strikes also come to mind.  Warpy   Jun-17-04 05:19 PM   #7 
     - Americans don't have the balls to stage a one day nationwide strike  Lefty48197   Jun-17-04 05:34 PM   #11 
     - One day is not enough, and that comes from a friend I have known for  anarchy1999   Jun-17-04 07:21 PM   #12 
     - that would hurt lots of small business owners  redwitch   Jun-17-04 05:20 PM   #8 
        - Are we not already all hurting now? How much more do you want to  anarchy1999   Jun-17-04 07:22 PM   #13 
  - A speech by Harry Belafonte was on Democracy Now yesterday  htuttle   Jun-17-04 05:27 PM   #9 
  - I vote revolution  Lefty48197   Jun-17-04 05:32 PM   #10 
  - Revolution, civil disobedience, whatever  name not needed   Jun-17-04 07:33 PM   #14 
  - The "revolution" is evolution: a peaceful solution.  DemsUnite   Jun-17-04 07:43 PM   #16 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC